Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cwinvestments/memstack/roadmap-buildernpx skills add cwinvestments/memstack --skill roadmap-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cwinvestments/memstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/roadmap-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/roadmap-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cwinvestments/memstack/roadmap-builder.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.02706 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01353 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00541 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00271 |
Grade A, and why
memstack-product-roadmap-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 319 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Roadmap Builder: Building product roadmap...
Creates a strategic product roadmap in Now/Next/Later format with quarterly themes, milestones, dependency mapping, resource allocation, and stakeholder communication templates.
Activation
When this skill activates, output:
Roadmap Builder: Building product roadmap...
Then execute the protocol below.
Context Guard
| Context | Status |
|---|---|
| User says "roadmap", "product roadmap", "quarterly plan" | ACTIVE |
| User says "now/next/later" or "OKRs" | ACTIVE |
| User wants to plan product direction for 3-12 months | ACTIVE |
| User wants to scope an MVP | DORMANT: use MVP Scoper |
| User wants sprint-level stories | DORMANT: use User Story Generator |
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It's Wrong |
|---|---|
| "Roadmap with exact delivery dates" | Dates become promises. Use time horizons (Now/Next/Later) to preserve flexibility. |
| "Feature list disguised as a roadmap" | Roadmaps communicate outcomes and themes, not feature checklists. |
| "One roadmap for everyone" | Engineering, sales, and executives need different views of the same plan. |
| "Plan 12 months in detail" | Detailed plans beyond 3 months are fiction. Be specific for Now, directional for Later. |
| "Set it and forget it" | Roadmaps are living documents. Review and adjust monthly or quarterly. |
Protocol
Step 1: Gather Strategic Context
If the user hasn't provided details, ask:
- Product: what product are you roadmapping?
- Current state: what's been built? What's the current version?
- Company goals: what's the business trying to achieve this year?
- User feedback: what are the top 5 user requests or complaints?
- Competitive pressure: what are competitors shipping that matters?
- Resources: team size, key constraints, upcoming changes?
Step 2: Define Strategic Themes
Themes are the "why" behind your roadmap: outcomes, not features.
Theme template:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed 78989a11fc22
- yesterday First seen · 319 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 908af9b0eb97
memstack-product-roadmap-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository cwinvestments/memstack (419 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 2,706 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ship
Ship workflow: detect + merge base branch, run tests, review diff, bump VERSION, update CHANGELOG, commit, push, and create a PR. Use for an explicit /ship invocation or when the user requests the full ship, release, or deploy workflow. For an ordinary commit, push, or pull-request publishing request, use the built-in…
plan-ceo-review
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when…
plan-eng-review
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when…
autoplan
Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when…
design-review
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use…
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by BitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…