Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyanheads/mcp-reporter --skill code-simplifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/mcp-reporterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/mcp-reporter/code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/mcp-reporter/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/mcp-reporter/code-simplifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/mcp-reporter/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/mcp-reporter/code-simplifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00281 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00140 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code simplifier
Read CLAUDE.md, the full diff, every changed source file, and relevant tests. Trace behavior before editing. Focus on the changed collection, transport, config and rendering paths.
Prefer explicit types, small functions, native Node APIs and direct SDK calls. Remove dead code, redundant state, unnecessary wrappers and fallbacks that hide invalid data. A shared abstraction earns its place only when it makes actual repeated behavior easier to understand.
Preserve public signatures and compatibility fields, legacy negotiation defaults, ordered bounded pagination, separate collection statuses, descriptor fidelity, credential boundaries and unconditional cleanup. Do not replace explicit page collection with SDK aggregation or filtered list helpers without proving equivalent report semantics.
Avoid cosmetic renames, speculative flexibility and aggressive test deduplication. If a helper makes control flow or typing harder, inline it. A review with no change is a valid result.
Apply one behavior-preserving simplification at a time, then run bun run devcheck and the affected transport/package tests. Report what changed and why, or confirm the changed code was already appropriately scoped. No commits, tags or publishing in this workflow.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 21 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A a67f9a61bb1e
code-simplifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/mcp-reporter (12 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 281 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-09.
Other skills, from other repositories
cn-check
Install and run the Continue CLI (cn) to execute AI agent checks on local code changes. Use when asked to "run checks", "lint with AI", "review my changes with cn", or set up Continue CI locally.
printing-press-output-review
Internal sub-skill: agentic review of a printed CLI's sampled command output for plausibility issues that rule-based checks can't encode (substring-match relevance, format bugs, silent source drops, ranking failures). Invoked via the Skill tool by the main printing-press skill at Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish…
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
issue-root-resolution
Trigger: root audit, atacar la raíz, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, resolver issues de raíz, close outdated issues. Audit and resolve issue clusters by verified root cause.
mindos
MindOS: local knowledge assistant & shared KB. Keeps decisions, notes, SOPs, debugging lessons, research findings, preferences across sessions/agents. Core: save notes, search KB, organize files, run workflows, review, append CSV, hand off context, distill lessons. NOT for app source or paths outside KB. Triggers…
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…