Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyanheads/mcp-ts-core --skill report-issue-frameworkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/mcp-ts-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/report-issue-framework)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/report-issue-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/report-issue-framework/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/report-issue-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/report-issue-framework.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.03115 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.01246 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00623 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00312 |
Grade A, and why
report-issue-framework scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to report-issue-framework — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 275 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to Use
You've isolated a problem to @cyanheads/mcp-ts-core itself — not your server code, not a misconfiguration, not a missing peer dependency. Typical triggers:
- Framework builder (
tool(),resource(),prompt()) rejects valid input or produces incorrect output createApp()orcreateWorkerHandler()fails on a valid configContextproperties (ctx.log,ctx.state,ctx.inputs, etc.) behave contrary to docs- A utility from
/utils,/errors,/auth,/storage,/servicesreturns wrong results or throws unexpectedly - Type exports are incorrect or missing (compile error on documented usage)
- The definition linter (
bun run lint:mcp) produces false positives or misses real violations
For general gh CLI workflows outside issue filing (PRs, workflows, API access), see the github-cli skill.
Before Filing
- Confirm framework version —
bun pm ls @cyanheads/mcp-ts-coreor checknode_modules/@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/package.json - Check you're on latest —
bun outdated @cyanheads/mcp-ts-core. If behind, update and retest before filing. - Isolate the issue — reproduce with a minimal handler or standalone script. Strip server-specific services, config, and dependencies. If the bug disappears when isolated, it's likely in your server code.
- Search existing issues — don't file duplicates:
gh issue list -R cyanheads/mcp-ts-core --search "your error message or keyword" --state all
# Assess a close match before commenting — is it already linked to a fix or referenced elsewhere?
gh issue view <number> -R cyanheads/mcp-ts-core # body
gh issue view <number> -R cyanheads/mcp-ts-core --comments # thread only — without a TTY it prints no body
gh api 'repos/cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/issues/<number>/timeline' --paginate \
--jq '.[] | select(.event=="cross-referenced") | .source.issue | "\(.repository.full_name)#\(.number) — \(.title)"'
- For documentation- or contract-shaped requests, audit all three doc layers first — proposals to add reference docs, public-API conventions, attribute/event catalogs, or stability commitments often duplicate surface that already exists. Check
src/for behavior,docs/for human-facing reference, andframework-skills/for agent-facing reference. Skill files markedaudience: externalare the framework's public contract — treat them as authoritative when evaluating whether a documentation gap exists. Also verify the constants or types you'd reference aren't already exported from@cyanheads/mcp-ts-coreor one of its subpaths.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago Changed · +2 lines e117f3333d07
- 27d ago Changed 1c279193b7ea
- 1mo ago Changed · -29 lines 01825e7c3144
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines d0b77ea08db3
- 1mo ago First seen · 301 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 257a59da6a7e
report-issue-framework is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/mcp-ts-core (152 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 3,115 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to report-issue-framework, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
orgx-initiative-ops
Use OrgX context and explicit workflow tools to plan, organize, and execute authorized initiative work while preserving human review gates.
openclaw-task-queue
Persistent task queue MCP server with 5 tools for AI agents. Use when: (1) 'create a task for later' or 'add to queue', (2) 'what tasks are pending' or 'show task list', (3) 'assign this task to agent X', (4) 'mark task as complete' or 'finish this task', (5) 'how many tasks are done' or 'queue statistics'. TaskFlow…
orgx-deviation-reporting
Preserve meaningful changes of plan, failed checks, and corrections in authorized OrgX work receipts without turning producer reports into verified facts.
report-issue
File a bug or feature request against this repository (cyanheads/git-mcp-server) using the gh CLI. Use for tool logic bugs, git provider misbehavior, transport issues, auth/config problems, or new feature proposals.
build-flow
Create or change a Keboola flow that runs extractors, transformations and writers in order, optionally on a schedule. Use when the user wants to orchestrate, chain or schedule existing Keboola configurations.
reviewing-sla-definitions
Reviewing ServiceNow SLA, OLA and underpinning-contract definitions and how they perform: breach rates per definition, overlapping or duplicated definitions on the same table and target, and definitions that never attach. Use when the user asks about SLA breaches by definition, too many SLAs, duplicate or conflicting…