Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/code-simplifiernpx skills add cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server --skill code-simplifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server/code-simplifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00124 | $0.02827 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.01413 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00565 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00283 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- code-simplifier — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplifier — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplifier — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplifier — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplifier — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplifier — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplifier — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-simplifier — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Simplifier
Post-session cleanup pass. Reviews what changed, understands how it fits the existing codebase, and makes targeted improvements — modernizing syntax, removing unnecessary complexity, consolidating duplicated logic, catching efficiency issues. Prioritizes codebase cohesion over local perfection.
Core philosophy
Every change must earn its keep. A simplification that doesn't meaningfully improve clarity, correctness, or cohesion is noise. Don't refactor for refactoring's sake. Don't create new files, abstractions, or utilities unless they solve a demonstrated problem. If the existing code works and is readable, leave it alone. The goal is a cohesive codebase, not a pristine one.
Procedure
Phase 1: Identify changes
Run git status to see the shape of the working tree, then git diff HEAD for all uncommitted changes (staged and unstaged). Untracked files never appear in the diff — read new files directly. If the tree is clean, review the most recently modified files from the current session.
Phase 2: Understand the surrounding codebase
Don't review changes in isolation. Before any modifications:
- Read the full files containing changes — not just the diff hunks. Understand imports, surrounding logic, module structure.
- Identify the project language(s) and select the relevant transformation rules. Discard inapplicable rules.
- Survey adjacent code — shared utilities, sibling modules, common patterns. You need to know what already exists before deciding something is missing. For mcp-ts-core projects, check
src/utils/for project utilities,src/errors/for error handling, andnode_modules/@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/for framework exports.
Phase 3: Review
Evaluate the changes across these dimensions. Not every dimension applies to every diff — skip what's irrelevant.
Codebase cohesion
- Reuse — Search for existing utilities, helpers, and patterns that could replace newly-written code. For mcp-ts-core projects, prefer
import from '@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/utils'over hand-rolled equivalents — pagination helpers, schema builders, retry primitives, and OTel attribute constants are framework-provided. - Consolidation — Flag copy-paste-with-variation: near-duplicate code blocks that should be unified. Only unify if the shared abstraction is genuinely simpler than the duplicated code.
- Consistency — Check that new code follows the same patterns as the rest of the codebase: naming conventions, error handling style, import patterns, type annotation style. Normalize toward the better variant when the project is inconsistent.
- Stringly-typed code — Flag raw strings where constants, string-union types, branded types, or framework attribute constants already exist. For mcp-ts-core projects, the
ATTR_*constants in@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/utilsshould replace raw OTel attribute keys.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 131 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A b61d1bb9bf8f
code-simplifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server (674 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 2,827 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
knowledge-base-management
Obsidian 知识库全生命周期管理:三层架构、素材入库(ABC分级)、健康检查、GBrain/GraphRAG/LLM Wiki 三件套集成、目录整理.
ingest
Turn messy source notes into structured wiki pages (frontmatter, wikilinks, one folder per type) and update the vault's index, log and hot cache. Use when the user drops files into inbox/ and asks to process them, points at a note or URL to ingest, or pastes raw content to file. Triggers on: "ingest", "ingesta"…
lint
Health check for the vault: runs the deterministic linter (frontmatter, dead links, orphans, duplicates, index drift) plus editorial checks (stale claims, unlinked mentions, missing pages), then fixes what the user approves. Triggers on: "lint", "revisa el vault", "health check", "chequea el wiki", "limpia el vault"…
save
File the current conversation's valuable content (analysis, decision, session summary) as a structured wiki note so it isn't lost in chat history. Triggers on: "save this", "guarda esto", "guárdalo en el wiki", "/save", "$save", "file this", "apunta esto", "guarda esta conversación", "save this session".
pkm-session-end
Use when wrapping up a work session — creates devlog entry, captures undocumented decisions/research/debugging, audits link health of session work, and updates project index. Primarily used via the pkm-capture agent.
pkm-write
Use when writing to the vault — creating new notes (vaultwrite), editing existing notes (vaultedit, vaultappend, vaultupdatefrontmatter). Handles duplicate checking, link discovery, annotations, and index updates for new notes. Provides guidelines for modifications.