Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyanheads/reliefweb-mcp-server --skill report-issue-frameworkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/reliefweb-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/reliefweb-mcp-server/report-issue-framework)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/reliefweb-mcp-server/report-issue-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/reliefweb-mcp-server/report-issue-framework/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/reliefweb-mcp-server/report-issue-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/reliefweb-mcp-server/report-issue-framework.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.03115 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.01246 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00623 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00312 |
Grade A, and why
report-issue-framework scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to report-issue-framework — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 275 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to Use
You've isolated a problem to @cyanheads/mcp-ts-core itself — not your server code, not a misconfiguration, not a missing peer dependency. Typical triggers:
- Framework builder (
tool(),resource(),prompt()) rejects valid input or produces incorrect output createApp()orcreateWorkerHandler()fails on a valid configContextproperties (ctx.log,ctx.state,ctx.inputs, etc.) behave contrary to docs- A utility from
/utils,/errors,/auth,/storage,/servicesreturns wrong results or throws unexpectedly - Type exports are incorrect or missing (compile error on documented usage)
- The definition linter (
bun run lint:mcp) produces false positives or misses real violations
For general gh CLI workflows outside issue filing (PRs, workflows, API access), see the github-cli skill.
Before Filing
- Confirm framework version —
bun pm ls @cyanheads/mcp-ts-coreor checknode_modules/@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/package.json - Check you're on latest —
bun outdated @cyanheads/mcp-ts-core. If behind, update and retest before filing. - Isolate the issue — reproduce with a minimal handler or standalone script. Strip server-specific services, config, and dependencies. If the bug disappears when isolated, it's likely in your server code.
- Search existing issues — don't file duplicates:
gh issue list -R cyanheads/mcp-ts-core --search "your error message or keyword" --state all
# Assess a close match before commenting — is it already linked to a fix or referenced elsewhere?
gh issue view <number> -R cyanheads/mcp-ts-core # body
gh issue view <number> -R cyanheads/mcp-ts-core --comments # thread only — without a TTY it prints no body
gh api 'repos/cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/issues/<number>/timeline' --paginate \
--jq '.[] | select(.event=="cross-referenced") | .source.issue | "\(.repository.full_name)#\(.number) — \(.title)"'
- For documentation- or contract-shaped requests, audit all three doc layers first — proposals to add reference docs, public-API conventions, attribute/event catalogs, or stability commitments often duplicate surface that already exists. Check
src/for behavior,docs/for human-facing reference, andframework-skills/for agent-facing reference. Skill files markedaudience: externalare the framework's public contract — treat them as authoritative when evaluating whether a documentation gap exists. Also verify the constants or types you'd reference aren't already exported from@cyanheads/mcp-ts-coreor one of its subpaths.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +2 lines e117f3333d07
- 1mo ago Changed · -28 lines 01825e7c3144
- 1mo ago First seen · 301 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 257a59da6a7e
report-issue-framework is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/reliefweb-mcp-server (1 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 3,115 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to report-issue-framework, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
smiles-validation
Strict SMILES validation, structural comparison, and modification verification. Catches invalid LLM-generated molecules.
confirm-failures-are-causally-linked-to-the-task-before-reportin
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
isolate-the-specific-failure-mode-before-proposing-a-fix
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
ci-fix-monitor
Codex adapter for monitoring and fixing CI failures on opencode-swarm PRs. Use when diagnosing failed checks, fixing package-check (npm tarball) failures, resolving quality/lint/format errors, fixing macOS cross-platform file I/O failures, or watching a PR until all checks are green.
swarm-ci-monitor
Codex adapter for end-to-end CI monitoring of an already-reviewed PR in opencode-swarm. Use when the user wants the swarm to monitor a reviewed-and-approved PR's CI, research every failure exhaustively, fix end-to-end, iterate until green (max 5 cycles), then merge. Composes ci-fix-monitor for fix recipes.
issue-tracer
Use when asked to trace, investigate, root-cause, reproduce, plan, fix, resolve, close, or prepare a PR for an issue, bug report, defect, regression, failing test, or confusing runtime behavior. This Codex adapter delegates to the canonical protocol at .opencode, which owns the Full-Resolution Contract, reproduction…