Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyanheads/shift-mcp-server --skill polish-docs-metagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/shift-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/shift-mcp-server/polish-docs-meta)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/shift-mcp-server/polish-docs-meta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/shift-mcp-server/polish-docs-meta/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/shift-mcp-server/polish-docs-meta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/shift-mcp-server/polish-docs-meta.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.05394 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.02158 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00539 |
Grade A, and why
polish-docs-meta scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to polish-docs-meta — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 287 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to Use
- Server implementation is functionally complete (tools, resources, prompts, services all working)
bun run devcheckpasses, tests pass- You're preparing for first commit, first release, or making the repo public
- User says "polish", "polish docs", "finalize", "make it ship-ready", "clean up docs", or similar
- Re-running after adding/removing tools, resources, or other surface area changes
Prefer running after implementation is complete, but safe to re-run at any point — steps are idempotent.
Companion: pair with security-pass for a full pre-ship review — this skill polishes docs and metadata; security-pass audits handlers for MCP-specific security gaps.
Prerequisites
- All tools/resources/prompts implemented and registered
-
bun run devcheckpasses - Tests pass (
bun run test)
If these aren't met, address them first.
Steps
1. Audit the Surface Area
Read all tool, resource, and prompt definitions. Build a mental model of what the server actually does — names, descriptions, input/output shapes, auth scopes. This inventory drives every document below.
Read:
src/index.ts(what's registered increateApp())- All files in
src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/ - All files in
src/mcp-server/resources/definitions/ - All files in
src/mcp-server/prompts/definitions/ - All files in
src/services/(if any) src/config/server-config.ts(if any)
Capture: tool count, resource count, prompt count, service count, required env vars.
2. README.md
Read the gold standard first: the pubmed-mcp-server README — https://github.com/cyanheads/pubmed-mcp-server/blob/main/README.md (or ../pubmed-mcp-server/README.md when that repo is checked out beside this one). Mirror its structure, section order, heading forms, and density. Reuse its non-server-specific content as-is — the framework line under Features, and the Getting started / Configuration / Running the server / Development guide / Contributing boilerplate — and tune only what is server-specific: the header, the Overview description, the primitives and their Capability reference entries, the domain-specific and agent-friendly bullets, env vars, project structure. Then read references/readme.md for the conventions spelled out; where it and the pubmed README disagree, the README wins — note the discrepancy in your report rather than editing the reference.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +1 lines 4a671f3c402d
- 26d ago Changed · +9 lines a35cfa92eff5
- 1mo ago First seen · 277 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 50926cd53e50
polish-docs-meta is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/shift-mcp-server (1 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 5,394 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to polish-docs-meta, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
agents
Coordinate with other AI agents on this machine via the Dibs board. Use when you need to see what other agents are doing, avoid stepping on their work (directory claims), or send/receive messages (questions, requests to approve/deny, FYIs, handoffs). Also use whenever a Dibs new-message notification appears.
superagenticmcp
SuperAgenticMCP — the switchboard for your agent swarm. MCP-native router and multi-agent control plane that plans tasks, routes tool calls to racked MCP servers by capability and latency, streams execution, and files results into a memory-scope graph. Use when the user needs multi-agent orchestration over MCP, a…
memory-scope
Memory-scope constellation: persist run artifacts as a linked graph for later retrieval and board visualization.
multi-agent-workflow
Planner → workers → critic loop for SuperAgenticMCP missions. Use when coordinating multi-step agent work across racked MCP servers.
routing-capability
Capability-first routing with latency tie-break for racked MCP servers. Use when selecting which server handles a tool call.
multi-agent-workflow
Orchestrate sequential multi-agent workflows under a shared budget on OpenMesha. Use when a goal needs planner/researcher/worker roles or council-style decomposition.