Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cyanheads/workflows-mcp-server/add-resourcenpx skills add cyanheads/workflows-mcp-server --skill add-resourcegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/workflows-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/workflows-mcp-server/add-resource)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/workflows-mcp-server/add-resource"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/workflows-mcp-server/add-resource.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.02644 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01322 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00529 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00264 |
Grade A, and why
add-resource scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to add-resource — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
Resources use the resource() builder from @cyanheads/mcp-ts-core. Each resource lives in src/mcp-server/resources/definitions/ with a .resource.ts suffix. The standard registration pattern uses a definitions/index.ts barrel that collects all resources into an allResourceDefinitions array for createApp(). Fresh scaffolds start with direct imports in src/index.ts — the barrel is introduced as definitions grow. Match the pattern already used by the project you're editing.
Tool coverage. Not all MCP clients expose resources — many are tool-only (Claude Code, Cursor, most chat UIs). Before adding a resource, verify the same data is reachable via the tool surface — either through a dedicated tool, included in another tool's output, or bundled into a broader tool. A resource whose data has no tool path is invisible to a large share of agents.
Steps
- Gather the resource's URI template, purpose, and data shape from the user's request — ask only if genuinely absent
- Design the URI — use
{paramName}for path parameters (e.g.,myscheme://{itemId}/data) - Create the file at
src/mcp-server/resources/definitions/{{resource-name}}.resource.ts - Register the resource in the project's existing
createApp()resource list (directly insrc/index.tsfor fresh scaffolds, or via a barrel if the repo already has one) - Run
bun run devcheckto verify - Smoke-test with
bun run rebuild && bun run start:stdio(orstart:http)
Template
/**
* @fileoverview {{RESOURCE_DESCRIPTION}}
* @module mcp-server/resources/definitions/{{RESOURCE_NAME}}
*/
import { resource, z } from '@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core';
export const {{RESOURCE_EXPORT}} = resource('{{scheme}}://{{{paramName}}}/data', {
description: '{{RESOURCE_DESCRIPTION}}',
mimeType: 'application/json',
// size: 1024, // optional: content size in bytes, if known
params: z.object({
{{paramName}}: z.string().describe('{{PARAM_DESCRIPTION}}'),
}),
// auth: ['resource:{{resource_name}}:read'],
async handler(params, ctx) {
ctx.log.debug('Fetching resource', { {{paramName}}: params.{{paramName}} });
// Pure logic — throw on failure, no try/catch
return { /* resource data */ };
},
list: async (extra) => ({
resources: [
{
uri: '{{scheme}}://all',
name: '{{RESOURCE_LIST_NAME}}',
mimeType: 'application/json',
},
],
}),
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 226 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A bd2b36cc23dc
add-resource is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/workflows-mcp-server (31 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 2,644 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to add-resource, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-and-interface-design
Design APIs and module boundaries with contracts, Hyrum's Law, validation, and stable error semantics.
test-workflow
Universal n8n workflow testing via webhook or sub-workflow pattern.
n8n-patterns
Common n8n workflow patterns. Use when designing workflows to apply proven patterns for error handling, data processing, integrations, and flow control.
create-credentials
Create n8n credentials using type-safe factory methods. Supports Google, Postgres, MySQL, Slack, Telegram, OpenAI, GitHub, and more.
n8n-code-tool
Write JavaScript or Python for the n8n Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode) — the AI-agent-callable tool, NOT the workflow Code node. Use when building a Code Tool attached to an AI Agent, writing code that an LLM will invoke, parsing the query input, returning a string result, defining an input schema…
flow-next-impl-review
Carmack-level implementation review of changes via the configured backend. Use when asked to review code or a diff in a flow-next repo.