Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cyb213/Lab-Zero. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cyb213/Lab-Zero/main/.agents/skills/lab-plan/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyb213/Lab-ZeroWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyb213/lab-zero/lab-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyb213/lab-zero/lab-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyb213/lab-zero/lab-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyb213/lab-zero/lab-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyb213/lab-zero/lab-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.01477 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00591 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00295 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00148 |
Grade A, and why
lab-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines · +3 tokens per session c673d9709f3a
- 1mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 3c05b266612e
lab-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyb213/Lab-Zero (11 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 1,477 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
reflect
Use Recall Reflect to review AI coding workflow history as a conversation-first timeline and discuss observed patterns before changing behavior. Trigger when the user asks to reflect on a project, review AI coding workflow, inspect workflow friction, discuss repeated corrections, review handoffs, or explore possible…
evolve
Use when many related hardened instincts (high-confidence feedback/discovery memories) have piled up in one domain, when the user runs /evolve or asks to promote, cluster, graduate, or consolidate accumulated instincts into a Command, Skill, or Agent, or when files in Instinct Proposals need review. Part of the…
chief-of-staff
The CEO's right hand — maintains validated project context, prepares task contracts, logs cross-department decisions, and runs the weekly review. Use when the user says "what's in flight", "resume the project", "log this decision", "weekly review", "turn this idea into a brief", or when multi-department work needs…
self-improving-agent
Curate Claude Code's auto-memory into durable project knowledge. Analyze MEMORY.md for patterns, promote proven learnings to CLAUDE.md and .claude/rules/, extract recurring solutions into reusable skills. Use when: (1) reviewing what Claude has learned about your project, (2) graduating a pattern from notes to…
Himalaya Email
Work with IMAP email from the terminal using Himalaya for inbox reads, draft review, and carefully confirmed outbound sends.
GitHub PR Workflow
Move cleanly through branch, diff, review, validation, and PR update steps without losing scope or repository-native workflow.