Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyberflax2020/project-contract-harness --skill project-contract-harness-kitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyberflax2020/project-contract-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyberflax2020/project-contract-harness/project-contract-harness-kit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyberflax2020/project-contract-harness/project-contract-harness-kit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyberflax2020/project-contract-harness/project-contract-harness-kit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyberflax2020/project-contract-harness/project-contract-harness-kit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyberflax2020/project-contract-harness/project-contract-harness-kit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00119 | $0.02598 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01299 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00520 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00260 |
Grade A, and why
project-contract-harness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- project-contract-harness — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project Contract Harness
Overview
Use this skill to turn a broad engineering objective into a local, enforceable delivery contract. The contract persists the plan, tasks, decisions, risks, secret-access contract, resource guard, evaluation matrix, gaps, evidence, autonomy boundary, and handoff state on disk so a fresh agent can resume without relying on chat history.
This skill is intentionally product-agnostic. Do not copy customer names, private paths, internal service names, credentials, host details, or reference-project specifics into generated artifacts.
First Actions
- Identify
SKILL_ROOTas the directory containing thisSKILL.md. - Identify
REPO_ROOTas the target project root. If the user did not specify it, use the current working directory. - Probe for an existing
REPO_ROOT/.project-contract-harness/. If it exists, recover from it first: read status, tasks, gaps, gates, evidence, tooling, secret access, artifact index, and handoff before proposing or editing. - Analyze the project before editing, even for a single module or small request: repo shape, existing docs, test framework, package/build commands, runtime constraints, active concurrent work, and user-visible success criteria.
- If
REPO_ROOT/.project-contract-harness/does not exist, run:
python3 "$SKILL_ROOT/scripts/init_contract.py" --project-root "$REPO_ROOT"
- If the directory exists but lacks current required files, run the initializer
without
--forceto add missing files while preserving existing state. - Convert that analysis into the project harness: update
STARTUP.md,CONTRACT.md,PLAN.md,TASKS.md,TOOLING.md,SECRET_ACCESS.md,ARTIFACTS.md,RESOURCE_GUARD.md,EVAL_MATRIX.md, andgates.jsonbefore broad code changes. - Read the existing contract files in this order:
STARTUP.md,CONTRACT.md,PLAN.md,TASKS.md,STATUS.md,DECISIONS.md,RISKS.md,AUTONOMY.md,TOOLING.md,SECRET_ACCESS.md,ARTIFACTS.md,RESOURCE_GUARD.md,EVAL_MATRIX.md,GAPS.md,EVIDENCE.md,HANDOFF.md. - Check whether another active writer is working in the same repo. If there is a reasonable signal of active concurrent development, stay read-only or restrict edits to explicitly owned files.
- Run the contract checker before major edits:
What ships with it
17 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 266 B
- references/artifact-management.md 2.5 KB
- references/autonomy-and-blockers.md 4.7 KB
- references/contract-protocol.md 13 KB
- references/documentation-and-comments.md 2.9 KB
- references/evaluation-matrix.md 8.1 KB
- references/harness-evolution.md 2.8 KB
- references/persistent-tasks-and-watchdog.md 4.2 KB
- references/platform-adapters.md 5.1 KB
- references/project-specific-tooling.md 3.7 KB
- references/secret-access.md 3.8 KB
- references/templates.md 17 KB
- references/validation-gates.md 9.3 KB
- scripts/check_contract.py 19 KB runs code
- scripts/init_contract.py 24 KB runs code
- scripts/privacy_scan.py 4.4 KB runs code
- scripts/watchdog.py 3.9 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 163 lines · 119 tokens per session scan A a4da334b3e2f
project-contract-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyberflax2020/project-contract-harness (2 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 119 tokens to every session and 2,598 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm-plan
Full execution protocol for MODE: PLAN -- plan creation, external plan ingestion, QA gate persistence, task granularity, and traceability checks.
loop
Full execution protocol for MODE: LOOP — the compound-engineering loop: brainstorm → plan → build → review → improve, iterating under defense-in-depth stop conditions with generator/critic separation, durable resumable state, and mandatory compounding learning capture. Loaded on demand by the architect when the loop…
parallel-work-check
Apply before starting work on an existing branch. Checks for parallel work by other agents or developers that may supersede or conflict with your planned changes. Prevents wasted effort on stale branches.
issue-ingest
Full execution protocol for MODE: ISSUEINGEST -- GitHub issue intake, localization, spec generation, and transition to the full fix workflow.
orchestrator-lanes
A file-based project-management playbook for a specific Claude Code development orchestrator. It organizes work into lanes, plans, dependency steps, validation phases, and shipping stages.
project-life
A system for keeping project ideas, tasks, plans, progress, decisions, and lessons in one place. A monorepo-style project workflow is implied, but the input does not define the storage format in full.