Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyborg-garden/hermes-agent-mt --skill requesting-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyborg-garden/hermes-agent-mtWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyborg-garden/hermes-agent-mt/requesting-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyborg-garden/hermes-agent-mt/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyborg-garden/hermes-agent-mt/requesting-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyborg-garden/hermes-agent-mt/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyborg-garden/hermes-agent-mt/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.02128 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00851 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00426 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00213 |
Grade A, and why
requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
os.system(f"ls {user_input}") This is a copy
94% identical to requesting-code-review — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 281 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pre-Commit Code Verification
Automated verification pipeline before code lands. Static scans, baseline-aware quality gates, an independent reviewer subagent, and an auto-fix loop.
Core principle: No agent should verify its own work. Fresh context finds what you miss.
When to Use
- After implementing a feature or bug fix, before
git commitorgit push - When user says "commit", "push", "ship", "done", "verify", or "review before merge"
- After completing a task with 2+ file edits in a git repo
- After each task in subagent-driven-development (the two-stage review)
Skip for: documentation-only changes, pure config tweaks, or when user says "skip verification".
This skill vs github-code-review: This skill verifies YOUR changes before committing.
github-code-review reviews OTHER people's PRs on GitHub with inline comments.
Step 1 — Get the diff
git diff --cached
If empty, try git diff then git diff HEAD~1 HEAD.
If git diff --cached is empty but git diff shows changes, tell the user to
git add <files> first. If still empty, run git status — nothing to verify.
If the diff exceeds 15,000 characters, split by file:
git diff --name-only
git diff HEAD -- specific_file.py
Step 2 — Static security scan
Scan added lines only. Any match is a security concern fed into Step 5.
# Hardcoded secrets
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -iE "(api_key|secret|password|token|passwd)\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]{6,}['\"]"
# Shell injection
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "os\.system\(|subprocess.*shell=True"
# Dangerous eval/exec
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "\beval\(|\bexec\("
# Unsafe deserialization
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "pickle\.loads?\("
# SQL injection (string formatting in queries)
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "execute\(f\"|\.format\(.*SELECT|\.format\(.*INSERT"
Step 3 — Baseline tests and linting
Detect the project language and run the appropriate tools. Capture the failure count BEFORE your changes as baseline_failures (stash changes, run, pop). Only NEW failures introduced by your changes block the commit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 281 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 1126afb626b3
requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyborg-garden/hermes-agent-mt (14 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,128 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 94% identical to requesting-code-review, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
hermes-memory-providers
Install and configure Mnemosyne as a Hermes Agent memory provider — local SQLite with vector search, episodic consolidation, and temporal knowledge graphs.
mnemosyne
Persistent cross-session memory via Mnemosyne — store, recall, and consolidate facts, preferences, and context.
mnemosyne-memory-override
Hard rule override that forces Mnemosyne for all durable memory storage. The legacy memory tool is DEPRECATED for user preferences, credentials, and project conventions. Use memory ONLY for ephemeral session state.
review-workflow
A review workflow for GitHub pull requests and issues, including judging whether changes can be merged or an issue can be closed. It requires read-only review, REST API access, and testing changes in practice.
code-review
When the user wants a thorough code review of changes, a PR, a file, or a feature branch. Use when the user says "review this," "code review," "check my code," "what's wrong with this," "review my PR," "look over this," "critique this," "review before merge," or when submitting code for quality assessment. Performs…
with-eval
Reviews code diffs against a structured checklist covering security (sql-injection, hardcoded-secret, unvalidated-input), reliability (missing-error-handling, resource-leak), and correctness (off-by-one, wrong-comparison). Use when reviewing PRs, audit diffs, or any code change where you want a categorised…