Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Czarnak/totally-integrated-claude --skill tia-testsuitegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Czarnak/totally-integrated-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/czarnak/totally-integrated-claude/tia-testsuite)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/czarnak/totally-integrated-claude/tia-testsuite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/czarnak/totally-integrated-claude/tia-testsuite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/czarnak/totally-integrated-claude/tia-testsuite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/czarnak/totally-integrated-claude/tia-testsuite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00703 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00351 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
tia-testsuite scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TIA Portal Test Suite — Automated Testing
Scope
The installed Siemens.Engineering.TestSuite API covers Application Test,
Style Guide, and System Test. These are different execution environments and
must not share safety assumptions.
Reference files
Load ONLY the reference file(s) relevant to the task. Do not load all files at once.
| Reference file | Load when the task involves |
|---|---|
references/application-test.md |
Application Test sets/cases, PLCSIM execution modes, import, scope, and execution. |
references/style-guide.md |
Style Guide rule sets, import, scope update, and execution. |
references/system-test.md |
System Test cases, OPC UA endpoints/interfaces, import, scope, and execution. |
references/test-results.md |
Recursive result/message interpretation and pass/fail gates. |
Installed V21 root
TestSuiteService service = project.GetService<TestSuiteService>();
ApplicationTestSystemGroup application = service.ApplicationTestGroup;
StyleGuideSystemGroup styleGuide = service.StyleGuideGroup;
SystemTestSystemGroup system = service.SystemTestGroup;
The groups are singular properties. Resolve test sets, cases, and rule sets by
exact name and expected scope; never select .First() or [0].
Executor ownership
Executors are group services:
TestCaseExecutor applicationExecutor =
service.ApplicationTestGroup.GetService<TestCaseExecutor>();
RuleSetExecutor styleExecutor =
service.StyleGuideGroup.GetService<RuleSetExecutor>();
SystemTestCaseExecutor systemExecutor =
service.SystemTestGroup.GetService<SystemTestCaseExecutor>();
Every Run(...) returns TestResults. Apply the recursive result gate from
references/test-results.md; a returned object alone is not a passing test.
Permission and safety enforcement
- V21 introduces the
Edit Test Suite datauser right. Require it before importing, deleting, or changing test sets, cases, rule sets, or scope. - Treat imported test/rule files as untrusted input. Validate the exact file, provenance, intended objects, load options, and resulting identities before saving the project.
ImportOptions.Overrideand scope replacement are destructive. Require explicit project-write authorization and an inventory of affected objects.- Application Tests execute through PLCSIM. Require explicit simulator-execution authorization and distinguish system-managed from externally managed instances.
- System Tests use OPC UA and may target a live controller or other production endpoint. Require explicit live-operation authorization, the exact OPC UA endpoint/interface, credential/security expectations, and an approved test case. Never assume simulation.
- Style Guide execution is static, but imports and scope changes still mutate the project.
- Do not save the project unless requested. Do not claim success until top-level and nested result states, counts, and messages all pass the result gate.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 73 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A ac511c3b347d
tia-testsuite is a skill published in the GitHub repository Czarnak/totally-integrated-claude (57 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 703 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
phx-work
Execute Elixir/Phoenix plan tasks with progress tracking. Use after phx-plan to implement features with mix compile and mix test verification after each step, or --continue to resume interrupted work.
lab:autoresearch
Self-improving loop for plugin skills. Reads program.md, proposes one mutation per iteration, evaluates against deterministic scorer, keeps improvements via git, reverts failures. Targets weakest skill+dimension. Use with /loop for overnight runs.
review-testing
Review test code for quality, design, and completeness after implementing a feature or fixing a bug. Use when the user asks to "review my tests", "check my test quality", "are these tests good enough", "review testing", or after completing a feature implementation that includes tests. Also use when tests feel brittle…
testing-r-packages
Best practices for writing R package tests using testthat version 3+. Use when writing, organizing, or improving tests for R packages. Covers test structure, expectations, fixtures, snapshots, mocking, and modern testthat 3 patterns including self-sufficient tests, proper cleanup with withr, and snapshot testing.
codex-loop
Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.
verify
Verify Elixir/Phoenix changes — compile, format, and test in one loop. Use after implementation, before PRs, or after fixing bugs.