n8n-skills is a collection of Claude Code skills and hooks that guide AI assistants in creating, validating, and deploying n8n workflows through the n8n-mcp server. Developers use it to automate workflow construction, configure nodes and expressions, resolve validation errors, and operate self-hosted n8n. The catalogue entries are its skills, hooks, plugins, and instruction.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add czlonkowski/n8n-skills --skill n8n-subworkflowsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/czlonkowski/n8n-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/czlonkowski/n8n-skills/n8n-subworkflows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/czlonkowski/n8n-skills/n8n-subworkflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/czlonkowski/n8n-skills/n8n-subworkflows/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/czlonkowski/n8n-skills/n8n-subworkflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/czlonkowski/n8n-skills/n8n-subworkflows.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.04730 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.02365 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00946 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00473 |
Grade A, and why
n8n-subworkflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to n8n-subworkflows — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
n8n Sub-workflows
A sub-workflow is a reusable function. An Execute Workflow Trigger declares typed inputs, the body does the work, and the last node returns the output. A caller invokes it through an Execute Workflow node like any other step.
That framing buys you the things functions buy you everywhere: encapsulation, reuse, testability, replaceability. It's the primary reuse mechanism in n8n, and it's badly underused. Without it, the same logic gets copy-pasted across workflows — then a bug gets fixed in two places, the third copy gets missed, and your "identical" copies quietly drift apart.
This skill is about when to reach for a sub-workflow, how to define its input/output contract so callers (and agents) can actually use it, how to call it correctly (all vs each, blocking vs fire-and-forget), and how to name it so it gets found instead of rebuilt.
The two non-negotiables
Everything else is judgement. These two are not.
1. Search before you build
Before you write logic for a generic problem, check whether a sub-workflow already does it. The community MCP can't filter workflows by tag, so the name is the discovery surface:
n8n_list_workflows() # scan the library
n8n_get_workflow({ id: "<candidate>" }) # read its inputs/outputs + body
If something fits, use it and tell the user ("I found Subworkflow: Parse RFC2822 date — using that"). If nothing fits, build it with a discoverable name so the next search finds it. The discovery convention (verb-first prefixes) lives in NAMING_AND_DISCOVERY.md.
2. The Execute Workflow Trigger uses "Define Below" with typed fields — not passthrough
The trigger has two input modes. Default to "Define Below" with explicit typed fields. Define Below is the only mode that gives callers a schema to fill — it's what lets an AI agent pass values via $fromAI and what lets structured callers map fields cleanly. Passthrough has no schema, so the trigger can't be wired as a clean agent tool and structured callers have nothing to bind to.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 252 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 00eeee94733f
n8n-subworkflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository czlonkowski/n8n-skills (6,210 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 4,730 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to n8n-subworkflows, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
build-workflow
Full 3-phase pipeline (Research → Write+Validate → Deploy+Test) for shipping an n8n workflow end-to-end. Wraps Etienne's n8n-as-code:n8n-architect skill for schema research + authoring, adds repo-scoped orchestration — community-template lookup, validate-push-test loop, mcpTrigger publish gate, execution inspection…
build-stack-v2
EXPERIMENTAL deterministic builder for a whole n8n workflow STACK (multiple sub-workflows wired via Execute Workflow), JS-orchestrated. Takes a PRP-style end-to-end use case, decomposes it into sub-workflows along known rules, fixes the handover contracts between them, documents the architecture (mermaid) in one…
build-workflow-v2
EXPERIMENTAL deterministic variant of build-workflow + deploy, JS-orchestrated. Two modes: GREENFIELD (new workflow) and EDIT (change an existing one). Phase ordering, gate-checks (validate / drift-safe push --verify), and fix-loop limits are enforced by a Claude Code JS Workflow script instead of prose — gates become…
deploy
Push a local .workflow.ts to n8n, verify remote state, and live-test (test URL by default; --activate --prod runs production test). Side-effecting — only invoked explicitly via /deploy.
session-env
Explain and verify how a Claude session pins itself (and all its n8nac workflow/instance commands) to exactly ONE n8n environment without clobbering other sessions' global active env. Use when the user asks "which env am I on", "how does session env pinning work", "pin this session to env X", "why was my env command…
stack-intake
Guided interview that turns a rough idea into a PRP-style use-case description ready for /n8n-autopilot:build-stack-v2. Classic question-by-question format aimed at people NOT yet experienced with n8n — it asks about overall inputs, outputs, a concrete worked example, expected behavior, external systems, volume, and…