Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents --skill avoid-ai-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents/avoid-ai-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents/avoid-ai-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents/avoid-ai-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents/avoid-ai-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents/avoid-ai-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.00913 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00365 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
avoid-ai-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Avoid AI Writing — Audit & Rewrite
You are editing content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms") that make text sound machine-generated.
When to Use
- When asked to "humanize" or "clean up" AI-generated text.
- Before publishing agent-generated READMEs, changelogs, or documentation.
- When auditing content for statistical AI tells.
Core Modes
rewrite(default): Flag AI-isms and rewrite text to fix them. Returns Issues, Rewritten text, What changed, and a Second-pass audit.detect: Flag AI-isms only. No rewriting. Useful for CI/CD gates or audits.edit: Edit a file in-place with minimal, targeted changes using the Edit tool.
Voice Profiles (Optional)
Personas are canonical in voice-profiles — see that skill for definitions.
Pass the chosen profile name (casual, professional, technical, warm,
blunt) with the rewrite request instead of redefining personas here.
Context Profiles
Adjusts rule strictness for specific audiences.
linkedin: Social-first; relaxed on formatting, strict on P0 credibility killers.blog: Default; all rules full strength.technical-blog: Technical terms (robust, leverage, etc.) exempt; strict prose rules.investor-email: Extra strict on promotional language and significance inflation.docs: Clarity over voice; relaxed on hedging and copula avoidance.casual: Slack/DM style; P0 credibility killers only.
Instructions
- Audit: Identify AI-isms using the
references/patterns.mdcatalog. - Apply Profile: Adjust strictness based on context and tone based on voice.
- Execute Mode:
rewrite: Return audit, full rewrite, change summary, and second-pass audit.detect: Return severity-grouped issues (P0/P1/P2) and assessment.edit: Apply minimal Edit tool changes to target file; return edit report.
- Convergence: If
--iterate 2is passed, repeat until no patterns remain (max 2 passes).
Severity Tiers
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago Changed · -4 lines 96113ace76c5
- 1mo ago First seen · 89 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 852cc958e27a
avoid-ai-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 913 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
verification-quality
Truth scoring, code-quality verification, and automatic rollback with a high accuracy threshold. Use when validating agent output before it ships, gating changes on quality, or adding a verify-and-rollback safety loop.
code-review
Orchestrates code review by detecting the project language and architecture, then routing to the appropriate specialized review skill (code-review-go, code-review-typescript, code-review-python, code-review-php, code-review-architecture). Falls back to the generic checklist when no specific skill applies. Invoked when…
static-code-analysis
Selects, configures, and integrates a static analysis tool for the project's language. Covers tool selection, rule configuration, CI integration, fixing existing violations, and pre-commit hook setup. Invoked when the user asks to add linting, set up static analysis, or configure a code quality tool.
code-review-architecture
Architecture-focused code review covering hexagonal boundary violations, DDD anti-patterns, CQRS misuse, and microservices coupling issues. Applied in addition to the language-specific review skill when architecture markers are detected. Invoked when reviewing hexagonal architectures, DDD patterns, or microservices…
code-review-go
Deep Go-specific code review covering goroutine lifecycle, data races, error wrapping, domain modeling, and interface design. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when Go code is detected. Invoked when reviewing Go PRs, Go code changes, or performing Go-specific quality checks.
code-review-php
Deep PHP-specific code review covering strict types, PHPStan compliance, PSR standards, domain modeling, and ORM boundary violations. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when PHP code is detected. Invoked when reviewing PHP PRs, Symfony/Laravel changes, or performing PHP-specific quality checks.