Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add d-oit/rust-2026-template --skill lint-rustgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/d-oit/rust-2026-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-oit/rust-2026-template/lint-rust)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-oit/rust-2026-template/lint-rust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d-oit/rust-2026-template/lint-rust/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-oit/rust-2026-template/lint-rust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d-oit/rust-2026-template/lint-rust.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00614 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00246 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
lint-rust scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill: lint-rust
Purpose
Run comprehensive linting and static analysis on Rust code.
Trigger Conditions
- Before committing code
- During CI/CD pipeline
- When reviewing code quality
- After adding new dependencies
Prerequisites
cargo clippy(bundled with Rust)cargo audit(cargo install cargo-audit)cargo deny(cargo install cargo-deny)cargo machete(cargo install cargo-machete)
Steps
1. Clippy strict mode
cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings
2. Format check
cargo fmt --all -- --check
3. Security audit
cargo audit
4. Supply chain check
cargo deny check
5. Unused dependencies
cargo machete
Success Criteria
- All clippy lints pass with
-D warnings - Format is consistent
- No known security vulnerabilities
- All licenses are allowed
- No unused dependencies
Related Skills
build-rust- Building the projecttest-rust- Running testsrelease-rust- Release preparation
Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Clippy passes, so the code is clean." | Clippy alone doesn't check licenses, security, or unused deps. Run the full suite. |
| "cargo audit shows no advisories, we're safe." | Audit only checks known advisories. Also run cargo-deny for license compliance. |
| "I'll skip machete — unused deps aren't a big deal." | Unused deps increase compile time and attack surface. Remove them. |
Red Flags
- Running only
cargo clippywithoutcargo fmt --check - Skipping
cargo auditorcargo denyin CI - Ignoring
-D warningsflag (allows warnings to accumulate)
References
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -3 lines e247e308f5ab
- 1mo ago Changed 16d35c5c8e23
- 2mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A a328cd6df015
lint-rust is a skill published in the GitHub repository d-oit/rust-2026-template (14 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 614 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-backend
Performs a strict code review of Rust backend code (files, diffs, or snippets). Trigger whenever the user shares backend code (Rust, SQL) and asks for a review, feedback, or says "review this" — including partial snippets.
review-frontend
Performs a strict code review of the Svelte 5 frontend code (files, diffs, or snippets). Trigger whenever the user shares frontend code (Svelte, TypeScript, CSS) and asks for a review, feedback, or says "review this" — including partial snippets.
triage-review-finding
Verifies and triages a code review finding (from an AI review, audit doc, or human reviewer) against the actual codebase. Trigger when the user pastes a review comment/finding and asks to check, analyze, or evaluate whether it makes sense.
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
review
Diff-scoped correctness review that reads the codebase around the change — callers, contracts, and invariants — and returns line-anchored findings ranked by severity with confidence, then a merge-risk verdict. Use for reviewing a PR, diff, or named change set. Not for style review, approvals-as-rubber-stamp, or…
architecture-audit
Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…