Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/d0gesec/pownie/offsec-intel-graphnpx skills add d0gesec/pownie --skill offsec-intel-graphgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/d0gesec/pownieWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/d0gesec/pownie/offsec-intel-graph)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d0gesec/pownie/offsec-intel-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d0gesec/pownie/offsec-intel-graph.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.03893 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01946 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00779 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00389 |
Grade A, and why
offsec-intel-graph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 309 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Intel Graph — Neo4j Attack Knowledge Graph
The model writes Cypher directly to Neo4j using the mcp__neo4j__write_cypher and mcp__neo4j__read_cypher MCP tools. The model determines what entities and relationships exist in the data — this is LLM judgment, not scripted extraction.
When to Activate
- Any offensive security engagement (CTF, pentest, lab, red team)
- At the start of every attack session
- After context compaction (recovery read)
Before Any Attack Action (MANDATORY)
Before calling ANY kali MCP tool that targets a service, endpoint, or vulnerability:
- Query disproven attack classes — entire categories ruled out:
MATCH (ac:attack_class)-[:ON_TARGET]->(tgt:target {name: $targetName})
WHERE ac.status = 'disproven'
RETURN ac.key, ac.reason, ac.blocked_techniques
If your planned technique falls within a disproven class, STOP. Choose a different class entirely.
- Query prior attempts on the target:
MATCH (a:attempt)-[:TRIED_ON]->(target)
WHERE target.addr = $targetIp OR target.key CONTAINS $targetIp
RETURN a.technique, a.tool, a.outcome, a.output_summary, a.error_signature
ORDER BY a.created_at DESC
- Query untested edges — credentials or services not yet tried:
MATCH (c:credential)-[r:AUTHENTICATES_TO {status: 'untested'}]->(s:service)
WHERE s.key STARTS WITH $targetIp
RETURN c.key, s.service
-
Decide: If the attack class is disproven, do NOT try any variant — the entire class is dead. If the same technique already failed and nothing has materially changed, do NOT retry. Choose a different technique or gather new intel first.
-
After execution, immediately RECORD:
MERGE (a:attempt {key: 'att:<technique>:<tool>@<target_component>'})
SET a.technique = '<technique>', a.tool = '<tool>',
a.outcome = '<failed|succeeded|partial>',
a.output_summary = '<1-2 sentence summary>',
a.error_signature = '<access_denied|timeout|waf_blocked|...>',
a.created_at = datetime()
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 309 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A d848ffc2c4e9
offsec-intel-graph is a skill published in the GitHub repository d0gesec/pownie (24 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 3,893 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
retrospective
Post-engagement lessons-learned retrospective. Reads the engagement directory, analyzes skill routing decisions, identifies knowledge gaps and missing skills, and produces an actionable improvement report.
<skill-name>
You are helping a penetration tester with . All testing is under explicit written authorization.
Active Directory Attacks
This skill should be used when the user asks about "Active Directory", "Kerberoasting", "AS-REP roasting", "LDAP enumeration", "BloodHound", "DCSync", "Pass-the-Hash", "Golden Ticket", or needs guidance on attacking Windows domain environments.
cacti-exploitation
This skill covers Cacti network monitoring tool exploitation including authenticated RCE via graph templates (CVE-2025-24367), unauthenticated command injection (CVE-2022-46169), and authentication bypass techniques.
Common Exploits
This skill should be used when the user asks about "searchsploit", "CVE exploits", "exploit database", "common vulnerabilities", "reverse shells", "webshells", or needs guidance on exploiting common vulnerabilities and services.
Erlang/OTP Exploitation
This skill should be used when Erlang/OTP services are detected: Port 4369 (EPMD - Erlang Port Mapper Daemon) Erlang SSH (usually port 2222) RabbitMQ, CouchDB, or other Erlang-based services Covers CVE-2025-32433 pre-auth RCE and other Erlang attack vectors.