Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add d0hx4n2503/Agent-Skills --skill researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/d0hx4n2503/Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/d0hx4n2503/agent-skills/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d0hx4n2503/agent-skills/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d0hx4n2503/agent-skills/research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d0hx4n2503/agent-skills/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d0hx4n2503/agent-skills/research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00169 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to research — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Spin up a background agent to do the research, so you keep working while it reads.
Its job:
- Investigate the question against primary sources — official docs, source code, specs, first-party APIs — not a secondary write-up of them. Follow every claim back to the source that owns it.
- Write the findings to a single Markdown file, citing each claim's source.
- Save it where the repo already keeps such notes; match the existing convention, and if there is none, put it somewhere sensible and say where.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 12 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A e6fcb338825d
research is a skill published in the GitHub repository d0hx4n2503/Agent-Skills (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 169 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to research, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
casely
Virtual QA Lead that turns requirement documents into review-ready, TestRail-importable test cases in one conversation — no commands to memorize. Use this skill whenever the user has requirements, a spec, a user story, or acceptance criteria (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, TXT, MD, or pasted text) and wants test cases, a test plan…
story-repo-scout
Inspect a repository for story-specific implementation evidence, applicable decisions, validation prior art, and bounded planning-critical external primary sources, then produce compact Repo Context. Use for pre-implementation file discovery and greenfield path grounding; use tester-mindset for test strategy and avoid…
context-engineering
Workflow for context packets, context audits, compaction, handoffs, session memory, and deciding what AI-agent context to load, retrieve, trim, summarize, refresh, or omit. Use for context rot, context flooding, stale or missing context, task switching, and long-running agent sessions. Do not use when prompt wording…
story-implementation-planner
Create a constraint-aware implementation plan from a Ready Story Card and sufficiently evidenced Repo Context. Use when the requested artifact is the plan itself; use story-to-plan-orchestrator for multi-stage preparation, packet completion, resumption, or validation. Avoid story drafting, repo scouting, and direct…
story-to-plan-orchestrator
Coordinate multi-stage story-to-plan preparation across story-clarifier, story-repo-scout, and story-implementation-planner. Use for complete implementation-ready handoffs, two or more missing stages, split-slice selection, partial-packet resumption, consistency validation, or stale-stage recovery before coding; use a…
setup-playwright
Use when adding, extending, or repairing a repo-owned Playwright test harness across Node Playwright Test, Playwright Pytest, or .NET/Java test frameworks. Also use when explicitly persisting @playwright/cli developer tooling, or adding or regenerating Playwright Test Agent definitions for a compatible Node Playwright…