update-tools-coverage

A maintenance guide for comparing this project's tool support with Claude Code's documented tools and the Codex app-server schema.

In plain words
What is it for?
Refreshing the coverage document, checking typed input and output support, reviewing Codex tool schemas, and recording generic, legacy, renamed, or unsupported tools.
Why use it?
It keeps the tool-coverage documentation aligned after upstream changes or changes to local renderers and adapters.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/daaain/claude-code-log/update-tools-coverage
Any agent
npx skills add daaain/claude-code-log --skill update-tools-coverage
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/daaain/claude-code-log

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 59 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,333 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00059 $0.01333
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00666
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00267
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00133

Measured 2d ago against content hash 05cf29db482b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

update-tools-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 2 executable files (check_codex_coverage.py, check_coverage.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/update-tools-coverage/SKILL.md · 115 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Update Tool Coverage

Keeps dev-docs/tools-coverage.md in sync with the upstream contracts and our implementation:

  1. Upstream — the documented tool list at https://code.claude.com/docs/en/tools-reference.
  2. UsTOOL_INPUT_MODELS / TOOL_OUTPUT_PARSERS in claude_code_log/factories/tool_factory.py.
  3. Codex — the installed version's generated app-server ThreadItem schema, plus the rollout adapters in providers/codex.py, providers/codex_tools.py, and providers/codex_javascript.py.

The doc grades each documented tool Full (typed input + typed output), Input only (typed input, generic output), or Generic (no registry entry → params-table + raw-<pre> fallback), and separately lists tools we support that upstream no longer documents (renames like TaskAgent, supersessions like MultiEdit, legacy aliases, undocumented features).

Claude Code procedure

  1. Fetch the upstream tool names. WebFetch the reference and ask only for the tool-table names (the page is ~80 KB; a targeted prompt keeps it manageable):

    WebFetch https://code.claude.com/docs/en/tools-reference — "List the exact tool names in the main tools table, one per line. Names only, no descriptions."

    Note any tool the page marks deprecated/renamed — that's a candidate for the second table.

  2. Compute the truth mechanically. Feed those names to the bundled helper (run from the repo root; uv run is required so pydantic resolves — bare python3 fails with ModuleNotFoundError: pydantic):

    printf 'Agent Artifact AskUserQuestion ... Write' \
      | uv run python .claude/skills/update-tools-coverage/check_coverage.py
    

    It prints each tool's support level, the totals, the "we register but upstream doesn't document" set, and — if the doc exists — a drift report (missing / mismatched / stale rows). If it says in sync [OK] and the upstream name set is unchanged, there is nothing to do.

Read the full file on GitHub · 115 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 115 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 05cf29db482b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

update-tools-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository daaain/claude-code-log (1,201 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,333 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.