Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add daddia/claude-for-strategy --skill synergy-stress-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/daddia/claude-for-strategyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/daddia/claude-for-strategy/synergy-stress-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/daddia/claude-for-strategy/synergy-stress-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/daddia/claude-for-strategy/synergy-stress-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/daddia/claude-for-strategy/synergy-stress-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/daddia/claude-for-strategy/synergy-stress-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00845 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
synergy-stress-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Synergy Stress Test
When to use
Stress-test deal synergies — separate cost vs revenue, grade evidence, apply haircuts, bar-test deal economics. Revenue synergies must not borrow credibility from cost lines.
What this skill does not do
- Does not blend cost and revenue lines.
- Does not invent deal economics — INPUT NEEDED for price/hurdle.
- Does not approve deal — recommendation on adjusted case.
- Does not skip mechanism check on revenue.
Preconditions
| Input | If missing |
|---|---|
| Synergy line items | Ask user or deck |
| Profile synergy haircut / track record | Use default base-rate table; cite source |
| Purchase price / hurdle for bar test | INPUT NEEDED — no fabricated IRR |
Provisional mode
Default haircuts tagged [unverified — industry pattern] unless profile has org track record.
Trust spine
- Analytical Rigor (mandatory): Per-line tier, haircut arithmetic, double-count scan.
- Per trust-conventions; GATE before board finals.
Base-rate anchor
| Type | Typical realization |
|---|---|
| Cost strong evidence | ~70–90% |
| Cost weak | ~40–60% |
| Revenue any tier | ~20–40% |
Use profile overrides when configured.
Workflow
- Separate every line: cost vs revenue.
- Grade evidence per line; state tier, haircut %, adjusted value. Connector-sourced figures (
~~bi analytics,~~crm,~~spreadsheet) require[sourced: <connector>, <asset>, <as-of>]on each load-bearing number; otherwise useINPUT NEEDED. - Revenue mechanism check — missing mechanism → Weak.
- Double-counting scan.
- Recompute totals; bar test at adjusted number.
Output format
CONFIDENCE: [...]
COST SYNERGIES: [table]
REVENUE SYNERGIES: [table]
DOUBLE-COUNTING FLAGS: [...]
TOTALS: [...]
DEAL BAR TEST: [...]
RECOMMENDATION: [...]
Worked example
Input: $30M cost synergy (generic 10% G&A) + $50M revenue cross-sell (no mechanism).
Excerpt: Cost weak → ~50% haircut; revenue Weak → ~80% haircut; only works at optimistic number — material finding.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 8bae0e23465d
synergy-stress-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository daddia/claude-for-strategy (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 845 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
synergy-stress-test compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| synergy-stress-testdaddia/claude-for-strategy | Skill | 2 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code |
| reviewhelderberto/agent-skills | Skill | 20 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| tddhelderberto/agent-skills | Skill | 20 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code |
| visual-reviewhelderberto/agent-skills | Skill | 20 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| to-prhelderberto/agent-skills | Skill | 20 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code |
| to-ticketshelderberto/agent-skills | Skill | 20 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| debatehelderberto/agent-skills | Skill | 20 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code |