Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add daeryundf2-prog/LAZYANTIGRAVITY --skill remove-ai-slopsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/daeryundf2-prog/LAZYANTIGRAVITYWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/remove-ai-slops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/remove-ai-slops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/remove-ai-slops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/remove-ai-slops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/daeryundf2-prog/lazyantigravity/remove-ai-slops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.05009 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.02004 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01002 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00501 |
Grade A, and why
remove-ai-slops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 329 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Antigravity Harness Tool Compatibility
In Google Antigravity, use native subagents and tools (invoke_subagent with Tier-Routing, file editing tools):
| Task | Antigravity tool |
|---|---|
| Parallel slop cleanup lane | invoke_subagent with Model: "flash" (TypeName: "self") |
| Gate review / adversarial check | invoke_subagent with Model: "pro" |
| Direct file operations | view_file, replace_file_content, write_to_file |
| Direct command & test execution | run_command |
Remove AI Slops Skill
Inputs
- Default scope: branch diff vs
merge-base main(no arguments needed) - Optional scope: explicit file list passed by the caller (e.g., a Ralph workflow's changed-files set)
What this skill does
Cleans AI-generated slop from a bounded set of changed files while strictly preserving behavior. Locks behavior with regression tests first, then runs a categorized multi-pass cleanup, then verifies with quality gates and a critical review. Reverts and direct-edits when verification fails.
The core safety invariant: behavior is locked by green tests before a single line is removed. A checklist alone is not safety; a passing regression test is.
Categories (what counts as slop)
The agent looks for these ten categories. The first three are stylistic, the next four are structural, the next two are about hidden cost, and the last is about behavior coverage.
Stylistic
-
Obvious comments — comments restating code, trivial docstrings, section dividers, commented-out code, vague TODOs/Notes.
- KEEP: comments explaining WHY (business logic, edge cases, workarounds), ticket links, regex/algorithm explanations.
- KEEP: BDD markers (
# given,# when,# then,# when/then).
-
Over-defensive code — null checks for guaranteed values, try/except around code that cannot raise, isinstance checks for statically typed params, default values for required params, backward-compat shims, redundant validation duplicated at multiple layers, broad exception catching (
except Exception/except BaseExceptionin Python, emptycatch {}orcatch (e) { console.error(e) }without narrowing in TypeScript/JavaScript).- KEEP: validation at system boundaries (user input, external APIs), I/O error handling, nullable DB fields. Top-level boundary catch-all (CLI
main(), HTTP handler) with explicit logging + re-raise is acceptable. - REFACTOR:
except Exception→ catch the specific exception you expect. Emptycatch {}→ addinstanceofnarrowing or re-throw.catch (e) { log(e) }→ narrow withinstanceof, handle known cases, re-throw unknown. - PROOF REQUIRED: before deleting any validation or error handling at a trust boundary, Phase 2 must include an adversarial regression (malformed or hostile input) that fails if the guard is removed. No adversarial test → the guard stays. Redundant defense to remove is a duplicate of a check that already runs inside the boundary; a guard with no proof of redundancy is load-bearing.
- KEEP: validation at system boundaries (user input, external APIs), I/O error handling, nullable DB fields. Top-level boundary catch-all (CLI
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago First seen · 329 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 614cf51af95f
remove-ai-slops is a skill published in the GitHub repository daeryundf2-prog/LAZYANTIGRAVITY (14 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 5,009 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
Unit Test Scaffold (TypeScript)
Generate TypeScript unit test skeletons (Jest/Vitest) from specifications.
vitest
Vitest fast unit testing framework powered by Vite with Jest-compatible API. Use when writing tests, mocking, configuring coverage, or working with test filtering and fixtures.
github-copilot-upgrader
Use this to update the Github Copilot CLI/SDK.
code-review
Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues.
test-review
You are an expert DataHub test reviewer. Your role is to evaluate pytest smoke tests against established testing standards, identify issues, and provide actionable feedback.
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general improvement suggestions.