Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dailybothq/deepworkplan-skill/open-prnpx skills add DailybotHQ/deepworkplan-skill --skill open-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DailybotHQ/deepworkplan-skillWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00207 | $0.09921 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00103 | $0.04960 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01984 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00992 |
Grade D, and why
ai-diff-reviewer-open-pr scanned grade D with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Hidden instructionshighPrompt injection
Directives inside HTML comments, invisible characters or bidirectional overrides are read by the model and not by the person reviewing the file.
| `<!-- HTML comment instructions -->` | *(no equivalent)* | Stripped from the final body. Instructions are for the author, not the reviewer. | Strips warnings and disclaimersmediumAnti-refusal
Omitting safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.
- Run `docs-site build`; confirm the new page renders without warnings How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 926 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Diff Reviewer — Open PR (sub-skill)
Companion to the ai-diff-reviewer skill. Where the parent
reviews the current branch's diff locally, this sub-skill takes the
next logical step: authors a well-documented pull request from the
same diff — title, body, and (on request) a draft opener.
The design philosophy is unopinionated where it can be, opinionated where it needs to be:
- Unopinionated: the section shape adapts to your
.github/pull_request_template.mdwhen one exists. If your team already writes PRs with## Rollout planand a## Security reviewcheckbox, those survive intact. - Opinionated: every PR gets a Summary that leads with the outcome, a Test plan a reviewer can actually run, and — when the diff signals it — a Screenshots prompt for UI changes and a Breaking changes callout for API changes. These are the sections whose absence reviewers complain about; the skill won't let them slip.
Nothing gets pushed. Nothing gets merged. The skill only ever writes the
PR title + body on the remote via gh, always after a single-yes
preview.
When it fires
Create a fresh PR — triggers:
- "Open the PR", "open a pull request for this branch"
- "Create the PR", "create a pull request"
- "Draft the PR title and description"
- "I'm ready to push this for review — write the PR"
- "Make a draft PR" (adds
--draft)
Refresh / fix an existing PR — triggers:
- "Update the PR description"
- "The PR body is a one-liner — rewrite it in the proper format"
- "Fix the PR title, it doesn't match the diff anymore"
- "Refresh the PR body — I pushed new commits"
Fall through to a sibling skill when the developer:
- Wants a local review before pushing → parent
ai-diff-reviewerskill (default review flow). This sub-skill is the natural next step after that review. - Wants to install the CI action →
setup. - Wants to customize the review →
generate-extension. - Wants a git commit message (not a PR body) → defer; this skill writes PRs, not individual commits.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 926 lines · 207 tokens per session scan D 5094ff9d9d5c
ai-diff-reviewer-open-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository DailybotHQ/deepworkplan-skill (20 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 207 tokens to every session and 9,921 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it D with 2 findings (hidden instructions, strips warnings and disclaimers). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…