Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Daisybastioned440/lite-research-agents --skill research-proposalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Daisybastioned440/lite-research-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/daisybastioned440/lite-research-agents/research-proposal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/daisybastioned440/lite-research-agents/research-proposal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/daisybastioned440/lite-research-agents/research-proposal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/daisybastioned440/lite-research-agents/research-proposal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/daisybastioned440/lite-research-agents/research-proposal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00397 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
research-proposal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to research-proposal — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Research Proposal
A research proposal is a structured 2-page document. Every section must be present. Be concrete — vague claims are not acceptable.
Sections
1. Problem Statement and Task Definition
What does the system do? What is its input and output? What real-world problem does it solve? Scope must be neither too narrow nor too broad.
2. Input / Output Behavior
Concrete examples of inputs and outputs. Describe what the input and output variables look like and how they interact. Reference the actual data being used — do not describe hypothetical data.
3. Evaluation Metric
How will success be measured? Why is this metric the right one for this problem? A reasonably sized dataset of example input-output pairs must be identified — either from an existing source or collected from scratch.
4. Related Works
What existing research and projects are relevant? How does the proposed work differ? Reference specific papers and systems, not general fields.
5. Baseline and Oracle
- Baseline: a simple, easy-to-implement approach that gives a lower bound on expected performance
- Oracle: an upper bound — what would near-perfect performance look like?
- Neither needs to be implemented for the proposal, but both must be clearly described. If the gap between baseline and oracle is too small, the task is probably not well-chosen.
6. Methodology and Challenges
How will the problem be approached? Why does this method fit? What are the key challenges? What algorithms or models are appropriate, and what are the tradeoffs between accuracy and efficiency?
Requirements
- 2 pages maximum
- Every section must be present — do not skip or merge sections
- Concrete over vague in every section
- Related works must cite specific papers, not just name fields
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 43 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 11f73e883032
research-proposal is a skill published in the GitHub repository Daisybastioned440/lite-research-agents (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 397 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to research-proposal, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ant
Structured, enterprise-focused design system emphasizing clarity, consistency, and efficiency for data-dense web applications.
basic
Print-inspired visual language for books, magazines, and reports with editorial grids and expressive typography.
bento
Modular grid layout with card-like blocks, clear hierarchy, soft spacing, and subtle visual contrast for organized, scannable interfaces.
fiction
A playful, energetic, cartoonesque interface inspired by friendly children's-book illustrations — warm cream backgrounds, big bold custom display typography, saturated brand color blocks, thick black outlines, generously rounded shapes.
lingo
Playful, minimal design with bright colors, rounded shapes, tactile 3D borders, and friendly illustrations for approachable interfaces.
stitch
Clean, high-contrast enterprise design for data-driven workflows with intuitive drag-and-drop patterns and structured layouts.