Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DanielChicot/octopus-mcp --skill octopus-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DanielChicot/octopus-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielchicot/octopus-mcp/octopus-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielchicot/octopus-mcp/octopus-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielchicot/octopus-mcp/octopus-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielchicot/octopus-mcp/octopus-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielchicot/octopus-mcp/octopus-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00505 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
octopus-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Octopus account analysis
When the user asks about their Octopus Energy account, use the MCP tools — never invent figures.
Quick playbook
| User asks | Tool to call first |
|---|---|
| "How much did I spend last month?" | bill_summary with period.kind = "last_month" |
| "What did I use last week?" | usage_breakdown with period.kind = "last_7_days", group_by = "day" |
| "When am I using the most electricity?" | peak_hours with period.kind = "last_quarter", top_n = 10 |
| "Should I switch to Tracker / Agile / Cosy / Go?" | compare_tariff with the relevant target_product_code |
| "How am I doing on saving sessions?" | saving_session_history |
| "What tariff am I on?" | current_tariff |
Conventions
- Always state the period analysed and the units (pence inc-VAT, kWh) so the user can sanity-check.
- When a tool returns
caveats, show them — they prevent the user being misled by simplified projections. - For tariff comparisons, lead with the
pounds_summaryheadline and put the detail underneath. - For peak analysis, convert UTC timestamps to Europe/London (BST when applicable) before presenting.
- If the user mentions a tariff name without a code (e.g. "Tracker"), call
list_productsand pick a sensible matchingcode. If multiple match, ask the user which. - Never speculate about Saving Sessions earnings — only report what
saving_session_historyreturns.
Things not to do
- Don't claim the user "would have saved" anything beyond the
delta_pencereturned — the model is a pure tariff swap, not a behavioural projection. - Don't recommend Intelligent Octopus; the comparator can't model dispatches and the tool returns an error guiding to alternatives.
- Don't write to the user's Octopus account; the MCP is read-only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 0ef03bffbe6c
octopus-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository DanielChicot/octopus-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 505 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
octopus-analysis compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| octopus-analysisDanielChicot/octopus-mcp | Skill | 0 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| sector-rotationHKUDS/Vibe-Trading | Skill | 38k | today | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code, Codex |
| strategy-pivot-designertradermonty/claude-trading-skills | Skill | 3.7k | today | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code, Codex |
| twitter-readerhimself65/finance-skills | Skill | 3.5k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 110 | Claude Code |
| energy-procurementhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins | Skill | 1.5k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 93 | Claude Code, Codex |
| airdrop-hunting-guidenirholas/three.ws | Skill | 271 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| alpaca-broker-reconciliation-idempotencyalpacahq/alpaca-skills | Skill | 166 | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 83 | Claude Code, Codex |