Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills --skill auditing-commitmentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/auditing-commitments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/auditing-commitments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/auditing-commitments.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.02132 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01066 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00426 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00213 |
Grade A, and why
auditing-commitments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auditing Commitments
A proposal is a binding offer. Every "we will", "we shall", "we guarantee" and "we ensure" is a candidate obligation, and if it survives into the contract the offeror performs it at its own cost for the life of the award — sometimes with the proposal incorporated wholesale by reference. Overcommitting is not a writing problem, it is a margin problem that surfaces in month three of performance.
This skill inventories every promise in a draft, maps each one to the requirement that justifies it, and prices the difference where the promise is stronger than the requirement.
When to use this skill
Use this skill after drafting and before the Red Team, on any volume that makes performance commitments. Run it again on any section rewritten during review recovery.
Run it always on AI-generated or AI-assisted draft content. Generated proposal prose overcommits substantially more than human prose, and it does so in one direction: fluent future-tense verbs read as confidence, so a model optimising for confident prose accumulates obligations. The draft sounds strong and the delta is invisible until award.
Distinguish it from adjacent skills:
checking-submission-complianceasks whether the proposal will be accepted. This skill asks what the proposal obligates you to do.reviewing-color-teamsasks whether the proposal is persuasive and scoreable. This skill is indifferent to persuasion; a beautifully written unbounded guarantee is exactly what it exists to catch.shredding-solicitationsestablishes what was required. This skill depends on that output and does not re-derive it.
Inputs
Required:
- The draft under audit — one volume, one section, or the full package.
10-compliance-matrix.md, for the authoritative list of requirements.
Preferred upstream artifacts:
08-solution-design.md: to test whether each promise is actually staffed and funded as written.16-cost-narrative.md: to test cost-technical consistency on any promise with a price consequence.05-win-strategy.md: to distinguish a deliberate, funded differentiator from an accident.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 181 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A a44bdba6cbcb
auditing-commitments is a skill published in the GitHub repository danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 2,132 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-competitors
Produces a Black Hat competitive assessment for a US Federal opportunity as a wiki of competitor entities. Use when the user needs competitive analysis, a Black Hat review or session, competitor profiling, an incumbent assessment, or to understand the competitive field for a federal bid. Creates and enriches one…
qualifying-opportunities
Runs a structured bid/no-bid gate review for a US Federal opportunity and bootstraps the pursuit's knowledge wiki. Use when deciding whether to pursue or bid a federal solicitation, RFP, RFQ, RFI, sources-sought notice, or IDIQ task order — for a bid/no-bid decision, pursuit decision, gate review, opportunity…
igce-builder-ffp
Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA…
market-research-workflow
Trigger for: federal acquisition market research; FAR Part 10 reports; refreshing an existing market research report; analyzing commerciality, competition, small-business availability, contract type, consolidation, prior awards, vendors, or market conditions; or preparing supported findings for a Pre-Award Agent. A…
acquisition-policy-workflow
Trigger for: explaining current FAR, DFARS, or agency-supplement text; determining documented acquisition-policy status for an agency and FAR part; comparing codified text, RFO model text, and agency deviations; tracing acquisition rulemaking; finding procurement comment periods; analyzing public comments; refreshing…
govcon-growth-workflow
Trigger for: finding federal opportunities; capture and bid screening; competitor or incumbent intelligence; recompete pipelines; teaming partner research; agency, customer, or market intelligence; federal labor-rate or pricing context; or refreshing prior GovCon research. Always begin with the local SAM.gov…