Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills --skill drafting-proposal-sectionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/drafting-proposal-sections)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/drafting-proposal-sections"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/drafting-proposal-sections/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/drafting-proposal-sections"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/drafting-proposal-sections.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.01534 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00767 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
drafting-proposal-sections scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Drafting Proposal Sections
Draft proposal section narrative from approved storyboards — narrative that is compliant, responsive, and built to be scored. Federal proposal writing has a specific job: not to describe the offeror, but to make it easy for a tired evaluator to find the requirement, see it answered, recognize the strength, and write down a good rating. This skill drafts to that job.
When to use this skill
Use this skill after outlining-proposals has produced the annotated outline
and storyboards, to draft the substantive narrative sections of the technical,
management, and similar volumes.
It does not draft the executive summary (writing-executive-summaries), past
performance (writing-past-performance), key personnel
(developing-key-personnel), or the cost narrative (narrating-cost-volumes) —
those have their own conventions and skills. Use this skill for the solution and
approach narrative.
Inputs
Required:
11-proposal-outline.md: the annotated outline and the storyboard for the section being drafted.10-compliance-matrix.md: the requirements the section must satisfy.
Preferred:
05-win-strategy.md: the win themes and proof points.- The solicitation Sections L, M, and C/SOW/PWS — the source of truth.
- Source material in
source/— past performance, technical facts, resumes.
Without a storyboard, do not free-draft. Run outlining-proposals for the
section first, or build at least a minimal storyboard with the user. Drafting
without a plan is the failure mode this package exists to prevent.
Read ../../shared/glossary.md and ../../shared/pursuit-workspace.md if not
already read this session.
Intake
Ask these as a numbered list, then confirm before drafting.
- Which section(s). Which outline section(s) is this drafting pass for?
- Storyboard status. Has the storyboard been reviewed and approved? If not, draft the storyboard or get it approved first.
- Source material. What factual source material is available for the proof points — past performance data, technical details, named personnel, metrics? What proof points have no source yet?
- Evaluation approach. Is this a best-value tradeoff or LPTA evaluation? (Tradeoff sections sell value; LPTA sections demonstrate clean acceptability without gold-plating.)
- Page allocation. What is the section's page budget?
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 134 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A acf6255588f6
drafting-proposal-sections is a skill published in the GitHub repository danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 1,534 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-competitors
Produces a Black Hat competitive assessment for a US Federal opportunity as a wiki of competitor entities. Use when the user needs competitive analysis, a Black Hat review or session, competitor profiling, an incumbent assessment, or to understand the competitive field for a federal bid. Creates and enriches one…
qualifying-opportunities
Runs a structured bid/no-bid gate review for a US Federal opportunity and bootstraps the pursuit's knowledge wiki. Use when deciding whether to pursue or bid a federal solicitation, RFP, RFQ, RFI, sources-sought notice, or IDIQ task order — for a bid/no-bid decision, pursuit decision, gate review, opportunity…
govcon-growth-workflow
Trigger for: finding federal opportunities; capture and bid screening; competitor or incumbent intelligence; recompete pipelines; teaming partner research; agency, customer, or market intelligence; federal labor-rate or pricing context; or refreshing prior GovCon research. Always begin with the local SAM.gov…
igce-builder-ffp
Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA…
market-research-workflow
Trigger for: federal acquisition market research; FAR Part 10 reports; refreshing an existing market research report; analyzing commerciality, competition, small-business availability, contract type, consolidation, prior awards, vendors, or market conditions; or preparing supported findings for a Pre-Award Agent. A…
ot-cost-analysis
Trigger for: Other Transaction or OT should-cost, cost estimate, cost-share analysis, milestone pricing, funding profile, proposed-price comparison, prototype price analysis, research OT budget, production follow-on OT estimate, or OT price-reasonableness support under 10 U.S.C. 4021 or 4022. Build auditable…