qualifying-opportunities

qualifying-opportunities is a skill for Claude Code from danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills. It costs 104 tokens per session (1,923 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A decision review for a US government contract opportunity. It examines a solicitation, such as an RFP (request for proposals), RFQ (request for quotes), or RFI (request for information), and recommends whether to bid.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess new federal leads, review draft or final solicitations, and make bid/no-bid or pursuit decisions at pipeline checkpoints.
Why use it?
It helps avoid spending proposal time and money on opportunities the team is unlikely to win. The recommendation is based on evidence and a consistent review standard.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the federal-proposal-skills plugin — 22 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess new federal leads, review draft or final solicitations, and make bid/no-bid or pursuit decisions at pipeline checkpoints.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/qualifying-opportunities
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills --skill qualifying-opportunities
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install federal-proposal-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 22 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for qualifying-opportunities

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/qualifying-opportunities/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/qualifying-opportunities)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/qualifying-opportunities"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/qualifying-opportunities/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for qualifying-opportunities

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/qualifying-opportunities"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills/qualifying-opportunities.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 104 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,923 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00104 $0.01923
Opus 5 $0.00052 $0.00962
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00385
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00192

Measured 11d ago against content hash 999f32cb9f7c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

qualifying-opportunities scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/qualifying-opportunities/SKILL.md · 146 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Qualifying Opportunities

Run a disciplined bid/no-bid gate review on a US Federal opportunity and produce a defensible recommendation. The expensive mistake in federal BD is not losing a bid — it is spending bid-and-proposal money on bids that were never winnable. This skill exists to make that decision deliberately, on evidence, against a consistent standard.

When to use this skill

Use this skill when a user needs to decide whether to pursue or bid a federal opportunity, at any gate:

  • A new lead or sources-sought notice has appeared and the question is whether to invest capture resources.
  • A draft RFP or RFP has released and the question is whether to bid.
  • An opportunity already in the pipeline is reaching a gate review.

Do not use this skill to build the win plan — that is planning-capture and developing-win-strategy. This skill decides whether there should be a win plan at all. If the decision is already made and the user wants positioning work, route to those skills instead.

Inputs

Preferred upstream artifacts (from the pursuit workspace, if present):

  • 03-competitive-assessment.md: sharpens the competitive-position scoring.
  • 04-price-to-win.md: sharpens the financial and competitiveness scoring.

Without them, the skill still runs: it scores competitive position from what the user knows and records the lower confidence. A bid/no-bid decision is often made before deep competitive and price analysis exists; that is expected.

Read ../../shared/glossary.md, ../../shared/proposal-lifecycle.md, and ../../shared/pursuit-workspace.md if you have not already this session.

Intake

Before scoring anything, establish the facts. Ask the user these questions as a numbered list. Skip any already answered by a solicitation document or an existing 00-opportunity-profile.md in the workspace. Do not guess answers — unknown is a valid and important answer that lowers confidence and often the score.

  1. The opportunity. What is it — agency/office, scope of work, contract type, estimated value, period of performance, set-aside status, and solicitation/notice number? Is there a document (RFI, sources-sought, draft RFP, RFP) available to read?
  2. The gate. Which decision is this — an early pursuit decision (invest capture resources?) or a bid decision/bid validation (commit to proposing?)? How long until the proposal would be due?
  3. Customer relationship. What is the prior relationship with this customer and office? Has the team shaped this requirement, engaged the customer, or responded to an RFI/draft RFP? Is there an incumbent, and is it the user's organization?
  4. Capability and past performance. Can the organization actually perform this work? Is there recent, relevant, similarly sized past performance? Are required clearances, certifications, facility approvals, or NAICS size standards met?
  5. Competition and price. Who is likely to bid, and what is the realistic read on competitiveness? Is funding confirmed? Is there a known or estimated budget?
  6. Strategic fit and constraints. Does this fit the organization's strategy and growth direction? Are there blockers — OCI, a teaming dependency, a missing vehicle, capacity limits, or unacceptable contract terms?

Read the full file on GitHub · 146 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 146 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 999f32cb9f7c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

qualifying-opportunities is a skill published in the GitHub repository danielkinneyspears/federal-proposal-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 1,923 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

analyzing-competitors

Produces a Black Hat competitive assessment for a US Federal opportunity as a wiki of competitor entities. Use when the user needs competitive analysis, a Black Hat review or session, competitor profiling, an incumbent assessment, or to understand the competitive field for a federal bid. Creates and enriches one…

danielkinneyspears/govcon-pursuit-brain · 108 tokens

qualifying-opportunities

Runs a structured bid/no-bid gate review for a US Federal opportunity and bootstraps the pursuit's knowledge wiki. Use when deciding whether to pursue or bid a federal solicitation, RFP, RFQ, RFI, sources-sought notice, or IDIQ task order — for a bid/no-bid decision, pursuit decision, gate review, opportunity…

danielkinneyspears/govcon-pursuit-brain · 115 tokens

igce-builder-ffp

Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA…

1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills · 188 tokens

market-research-workflow

Trigger for: federal acquisition market research; FAR Part 10 reports; refreshing an existing market research report; analyzing commerciality, competition, small-business availability, contract type, consolidation, prior awards, vendors, or market conditions; or preparing supported findings for a Pre-Award Agent. A…

1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills · 159 tokens

acquisition-policy-workflow

Trigger for: explaining current FAR, DFARS, or agency-supplement text; determining documented acquisition-policy status for an agency and FAR part; comparing codified text, RFO model text, and agency deviations; tracing acquisition rulemaking; finding procurement comment periods; analyzing public comments; refreshing…

1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills · 115 tokens

govcon-growth-workflow

Trigger for: finding federal opportunities; capture and bid screening; competitor or incumbent intelligence; recompete pipelines; teaming partner research; agency, customer, or market intelligence; federal labor-rate or pricing context; or refreshing prior GovCon research. Always begin with the local SAM.gov…

1102tools-dev/federal-contracting-skills · 115 tokens