Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/danielpodolsky/ownyourcode/backendnpx skills add DanielPodolsky/ownyourcode --skill backendgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DanielPodolsky/ownyourcodeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01065 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00532 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
backend-fundamentals scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Backend Fundamentals Review
"APIs are contracts. Break them, and you break trust."
When to Apply
Activate this skill when reviewing:
- API route handlers
- Express/Fastify/Hono middleware
- Database queries and models
- Authentication/authorization logic
- Server-side business logic
Review Checklist
API Design
- RESTful: Do routes follow REST conventions? (GET for read, POST for create, etc.)
- Naming: Are endpoints nouns, not verbs? (
/usersnot/getUsers) - Versioning: Is API versioned for future changes? (
/api/v1/) - Status Codes: Are correct HTTP status codes returned?
Separation of Concerns
- Routes: Do routes only handle HTTP concerns (req/res)?
- Controllers: Is business logic in controllers/services, not routes?
- Services: Is data access abstracted from business logic?
- Models: Are models responsible only for data shape/validation?
Error Handling
- Try/Catch: Are async operations wrapped properly?
- Error Responses: Are errors returned with proper status codes?
- Logging: Are errors logged with context?
- No Leaks: Are internal errors hidden from clients?
Security
- Input Validation: Is ALL input validated before use?
- Authentication: Are protected routes actually protected?
- Authorization: Can users only access their own data?
- Rate Limiting: Are endpoints protected from abuse?
Common Mistakes (Anti-Patterns)
1. Fat Routes
❌ app.post('/users', async (req, res) => {
// 100 lines of validation, business logic, DB queries
});
✅ app.post('/users', validateUser, userController.create);
2. No Input Validation
❌ const { email } = req.body;
await db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${email}'`);
✅ const { email } = validateBody(req.body, userSchema);
await User.findByEmail(email); // parameterized
3. Wrong Status Codes
❌ res.status(200).json({ error: 'Not found' });
✅ res.status(404).json({ error: 'User not found' });
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 148 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 9a3fe6169b44
backend-fundamentals is a skill published in the GitHub repository DanielPodolsky/ownyourcode (276 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,065 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-release-swarm
Agent skill for release-swarm - invoke with $agent-release-swarm.
agent-code-analyzer
Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer.
agui-dotnet-streaming-chat
Get started with the AG-UI .NET SDK: bootstrap and run your first streaming-chat app (client + server) with the AG-UI .NET NuGet packages (AGUI.Client, AGUI.Server, AGUI.Formatting, AGUI.Abstractions). USE FOR: which packages to install and how to wire them; constructing an AGUIChatClient against an endpoint and…
agui-dotnet-sample-step
Add a GettingStarted sample Step (a Server/Client pair) to the AG-UI .NET SDK that demonstrates one protocol feature the way we want users to write it. USE FOR: adding a new samples/GettingStarted/StepNN Server+Client pair, wiring it into AGUI.slnx and the integration-test project, giving it a deterministic…
agui-dotnet-protobuf
Use the protobuf wire transport (instead of the default Server-Sent Events) for an AG-UI connection with the AG-UI .NET SDK — a compact binary event stream negotiated via the Accept header. USE FOR: making an AGUIChatClient prefer protobuf by wiring an AGUIEventStreamHandler with ProtobufEventStreamFormatter (then…
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…