Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dankosik/go-service-template-rest --skill go-idiomaticgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dankosik/go-service-template-restWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-idiomatic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-idiomatic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-idiomatic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-idiomatic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-idiomatic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00299 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
go-idiomatic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Go Idiomatic
Go correctness follows semantic ownership: who owns error identity, work lifetime, mutable backing storage, release, and the admissible zero state.
For a delegated Decision or Review, or when the active artifact requires its result interface, load the shared specialist contract. For every changed boundary, build one ownership story from producer through caller-visible observation. Name who may inspect the error, cancel the work, mutate aliased state, release the resource, construct a non-zero value, and reach each method through the stored type.
Configured linters prove mechanical shape, not that %w exposes the right
cause, Close occurs in the owning scope, a clone has sufficient depth, or a
typed nil is absent to its caller. A Decision assigns each obligation to one
owner and observable contract. A Review tries the plausible wrong default at
the actual caller boundary.
Complete when every changed semantic boundary has one owner, preserved caller-visible behavior, and focused proof or a named gap. Load the reference selector only when its stated pressure is observable in changed symbols or callers.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · +2 lines 4953ef03d386
- 11d ago First seen · 30 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A f8292d33a187
go-idiomatic is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dankosik/go-service-template-rest (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 299 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…
gemtracker
Analyze Ruby gem dependencies, vulnerabilities, outdated packages, maintenance health, and insecure gem sources with the gemtracker CLI. Use when asked to audit Ruby gems, check Gemfile.lock security, review dependency health, or run gemtracker.
go-code-review
Use when reviewing Go code or checking code against community style standards. Also use proactively before submitting a Go PR or when reviewing any Go code changes, even if the user doesn't explicitly request a style review. Does not cover language-specific syntax — delegates to specialized skills.
code-review-go
Deep Go-specific code review covering goroutine lifecycle, data races, error wrapping, domain modeling, and interface design. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when Go code is detected. Invoked when reviewing Go PRs, Go code changes, or performing Go-specific quality checks.
code-reviewer-go
Auto-route to this skill if project contains.