Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dankosik/go-service-template-rest --skill go-structural-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dankosik/go-service-template-restWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-structural-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-structural-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-structural-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-structural-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/go-structural-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00276 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
go-structural-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Go Structural Quality
Judge whole-diff structure with a deletion test and one realistic change simulation.
For a delegated Decision or Review, or when the active artifact requires its result interface, load the shared specialist contract. For every added abstraction, layer, file, compatibility shim, or parallel path, record its present responsibility, where its complexity returns if deleted, and which owners and files the next realistic change would touch with and without it.
An interface with one adapter is not justified merely by hiding the adapter; it must reduce current complexity or protect a real dependency direction. A one-use helper survives when it uniquely carries a protocol or ownership constraint. Split responsibility, stale surfaces, and parallel execution paths remain collapse candidates.
A Decision selects the least structure that owns the current responsibility. A Review tries to delete or collapse each candidate and rejects it only when the simulation exposes higher locality or deletion cost.
Complete when every added structure passes both tests, each responsibility has one owner, and no superseded execution path remains.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · +2 lines 9401e7099bf1
- 10d ago First seen · 32 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 656af0016187
go-structural-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dankosik/go-service-template-rest (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 276 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…
gemtracker
Analyze Ruby gem dependencies, vulnerabilities, outdated packages, maintenance health, and insecure gem sources with the gemtracker CLI. Use when asked to audit Ruby gems, check Gemfile.lock security, review dependency health, or run gemtracker.
go-code-review
Use when reviewing Go code or checking code against community style standards. Also use proactively before submitting a Go PR or when reviewing any Go code changes, even if the user doesn't explicitly request a style review. Does not cover language-specific syntax — delegates to specialized skills.
code-review-go
Deep Go-specific code review covering goroutine lifecycle, data races, error wrapping, domain modeling, and interface design. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when Go code is detected. Invoked when reviewing Go PRs, Go code changes, or performing Go-specific quality checks.
code-reviewer-go
Auto-route to this skill if project contains.