Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dankosik/go-service-template-rest --skill thermo-nuclear-code-quality-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dankosik/go-service-template-restWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dankosik/go-service-template-rest/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00532 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00266 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Thermo-Nuclear Code Quality Review
Review one fixed candidate read-only. Be ambitious only where repository evidence supports deleting or collapsing structure without changing accepted behavior; do not edit the candidate.
Resolve the requested diff from repository context, then read its full changed sources, direct callers, canonical owners, and accepted proof boundary. Do not blend materially different candidates. Apply the shared Review contract.
Load only the matching method:
- added abstractions, layers, files, shims, or parallel paths:
go-structural-quality - opaque control flow, helpers, predicates, or deduplication:
go-language-simplifier - package, source, dependency, or proof-placement ambiguity:
go-implementation-ownership - an independent Go contract, lifecycle, security, data, or performance pressure: the corresponding Go skill
For every affected responsibility and added structure, record its anchor, current owner, deletion or collapse attempt, observables that must survive, next realistic change cost, available proof, and disposition. A code-judo finding survives only with a concrete smaller replacement and an accounted behavior boundary. Preserve error identity, status, nil/empty meaning, mutation authority, cleanup and side-effect order, and dependency direction when they apply.
Treat file length, branch count, duplication, and sequential execution as search signals, not findings. Do not prescribe extraction, a new abstraction, parallelism, or atomicity without evidence that it reduces present ownership or reader cost while preserving behavior.
Return findings first, ordered by outcome impact. Each finding names its anchor, impact, classification and verdict, smallest repair owner, evidence boundary, and compact replacement. Omit cosmetic nits. If no material finding survives, say so explicitly.
Complete when every affected responsibility and added structure has a disposition, then return one Review Result V1 for the fixed candidate.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 48 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A d4b54baa3936
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dankosik/go-service-template-rest (7 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 532 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-creator
Create, edit, improve, or audit AgentSkills. Use when creating a new skill from scratch or when asked to improve, review, audit, tidy up, or clean up an existing skill or SKILL.md file. Also use when editing or restructuring a skill directory.
code-reviewer
Analyze project source code and generate optimization suggestions. Use when user wants code review, performance optimization advice, security hardening recommendations, or architecture improvement suggestions.
code-guidelines-go
Go 1.24–1.27 coding guidelines for the dimetron/pi-go AI agent runtime. Use this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or refactoring ANY Go code in pi-go. This covers idiomatic style, error handling, concurrency, project layout, testing (table-driven, fuzz, benchmarks, synctest), new stdlib usage, golangci-lint v2…
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.
vhs-e2e-gif
Record a test run, a TUI session, or any terminal command as a GIF with VHS and attach it to a GitHub PR as a release-hosted asset, never a repo commit. Use when asked to record an e2e run, demo a fix on a PR, attach a GIF or screen recording to a pull request, show a test passing visually, or produce a terminal…
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…