Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack --skill ai-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack/ai-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack/ai-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack/ai-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack/ai-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack/ai-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00329 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00132 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
ai-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 49daff11de43
ai-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 329 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
gh-issues
Fetch GitHub issues, spawn sub-agents to implement fixes and open PRs, then monitor and address PR review comments. Usage: /gh-issues [owner/repo] [--label bug] [--limit 5] [--milestone v1.0] [--assignee @me] [--fork user/repo] [--watch] [--interval 5] [--reviews-only] [--cron] [--dry-run] [--model glm-5]…
openclaw-pr-maintainer
Maintainer workflow for reviewing, triaging, preparing, closing, or landing OpenClaw pull requests and related issues. Use when Codex needs to validate bug-fix claims, search for related issues or PRs, apply or recommend close/reason labels, prepare GitHub comments safely, check review-thread follow-up, or perform…
swift-review
Reviews Swift/Xcode codebases, pull requests, local changes, or individual files against Swift best practices including Google's Swift Style Guide, Apple's API Design Guidelines, build performance, memory management, and testing standards. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review Swift code, audit a Swift PR…
code-reviewer
A code-reviewing role that checks code for bugs, security weaknesses, readability problems, design issues, and performance concerns.
oracle
Use the @steipete/oracle CLI to bundle a prompt plus the right files and get a second-model review (API or browser) for debugging, refactors, design checks, or cross-validation.
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high…