Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner --skill sdd-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-plannerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner/sdd-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner/sdd-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner/sdd-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner/sdd-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner/sdd-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01348 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00539 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
sdd-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implementation Code Review
Resources
Before opening shared/..., follow symlinks in this loaded file's path, derive
<plugin-root> from <plugin-root>/skills/<name>/SKILL.md, and read
shared/agent-runtime.md, shared/path-resolution.md, shared/vcs-detection.md,
shared/completion-evidence.md, and shared/review-lanes.md in place. Never
copy or symlink plugin material into a working directory, target repository, or
planning root.
Review Lanes
Use four independent lenses. When fresh non-inheriting contexts are available,
dispatch all four in parallel; otherwise run affected lanes serially and record
the accurate mixed or single-agent review mode. Do not claim independent
corroboration for serial lanes.
| Lens | Dispatch identifier | Inputs | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plan drift | review_plan_drift |
Diff, plan, phase, prior debriefs | Missing work, scope creep, approach drift |
| Quality | review_quality |
Diff and code only | Correctness, safety, maintainability, tests, needless complexity |
| Spec compliance | review_spec_compliance |
Diff, specs, designs | Requirements coverage and contract violations |
| Blind spots | review_blind_spots |
Diff and changed-code context only | Adversarial edge cases, production failures, security, concurrency |
Do not pass plan, spec, or design material to the quality or blind-spot lanes. Use exactly these runtime-neutral identifiers when the runtime exposes a task name or description field; do not request an agent or model.
Synthesis Rules
- Only independently run lanes can corroborate findings; serial lanes do not corroborate, including in mixed or single-agent review mode.
- Surface lane disagreements with their evidence rather than silently resolving them in synthesis.
- Label a finding raised only by the blind-spots lane as
blind-spot-only. - Do not manufacture primary-agent findings in synthesis; consolidate only findings actually reported by a lane.
Process
- Identify the active plan, phase, target repository, and concrete diff range.
A phase-completion gate requires a frozen durable native SCM revision/range;
dirty or no-SCM work is not eligible.
If synthesis or resolution relies on a decision, run
sdd decide current --plan <Name>for the plan's standing decisions. Do not pass that context to any of the four intent-isolated lanes. A resolution that binds work beyond this artifact followsshared/decision-log.md: show the exact statement, then runsdd decide add --plan <Name> --statement "..."once approved. - Check completion evidence. Missing, pending, vague, failing, or source-identity-mismatched evidence is a plan-drift finding, not proof.
- Render and run all four lanes, preserving their input isolation. Consolidate
only actual findings and give
Aligned,Needs changes,Blocked, orNo reviewable diffwith actual verification results. For a graph plan'sreview-role node, every finding leftopencarriesaction: revise(withnodesand arevise:block) oraction: extend(with anode:fragment), and the verdict isAlignedonly when every finding is terminal, elseAmend— the frozen findings reportsdd graph amendapplies (shared/review-artifacts.md). - Persist the review using
shared/templates/review.md. A phase gate is driven through the binary: `sdd review scaffold --frozen - Validate the persisted gate with
sdd validate --scope Plans/<PlanName> --format jsonbefore handing the result back tosdd-implement, and cite the gate from phase evidence as- Final aligned review: <artifact path>; frozen: <exact rev>. The Git target adapter uses a full immutable<base>..<endpoint>range whose endpoint is the clean phase checkpoint. The planning Git adapter loads phase and plan content atreviewed_planning_revision; only lifecycle-only changes may follow review. Write the review in-flow. At phase close, it belongs unchanged at planningHEADin the planning-root atomic commit with the debrief, evidence/status, and plan phase-array update. Record every affected plan decisions file in that same planning-root boundary commit (shared/autonomy.md§ SCM boundary cadence). In Git, commit only in commit-capable workflows where commits are authorized. Unsupported planning or target SCM adapters keep the phase non-complete. - Material findings create new planned tasks. Implement each as a complete, reviewed native revision, then freeze and rerun all four lanes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 824a27f0d078
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines ad87b873c6b1
- 2mo ago Changed 62eeb34c5b38
- 2mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 9ef17e25339f
sdd-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,348 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
sdd-code-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sdd-code-reviewdanweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner | Skill | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code |
| moai-ref-cross-model-auditmodu-ai/moai-adk | Skill | 1.3k | 4d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 96 | Claude Code |
| moai-foundation-qualitymodu-ai/moai-adk | Skill | 1.3k | 4d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 58 | Claude Code |
| moai-reviewmodu-ai/moai-adk | Skill | 1.3k | 4d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweralirezarezvani/claude-code-tresor | Skill | 782 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| fresh-eyesadamlinscott/claude-skills | Skill | 4 | 8d ago | MIT | A | 123 | Claude Code |
| amby-convergeambystechcom/AmbyKit | Skill | 2 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code, Codex |