Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner/sdd-implementnpx skills add danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner --skill sdd-implementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-plannerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner/sdd-implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner/sdd-implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner/sdd-implement.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00062 | $0.03896 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01948 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00779 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00390 |
Grade A, and why
sdd-implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Walk the Plan Graph
Resources
Before opening shared/..., follow symlinks in this loaded file's path, then derive <plugin-root> from <plugin-root>/skills/<name>/SKILL.md; fallback search roots are repository/user .agents/ (including $HOME/.agents/plugins/*/), Codex ${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/plugins/cache/*/*/*/, and runtime-configured skill roots. Accept only a root containing this skill, shared/agent-runtime.md, and the matching plugin manifest; never use the working directory. Then read <plugin-root>/shared/agent-runtime.md, <plugin-root>/shared/path-resolution.md, <plugin-root>/shared/vcs-detection.md, <plugin-root>/shared/autonomy.md, <plugin-root>/shared/completion-evidence.md, and <plugin-root>/shared/language-verification.md with the matching <plugin-root>/shared/language-specs/ reference file.
Resource boundary: Read the plugin, all SKILL.md files, and shared/ resources in place. Never copy or symlink them into the working directory, target repository, or planning root. Only generated SDD outputs may be materialized from bundled resources.
Routing: Graph Plans vs v1 Plans
Route by graph presence:
Plans/<Name>/<Name>-Graph.jsonexists → the walk loop below. States derive from observations; completion is sync-only; thesddbinary refuses everything a narrated protocol used to let drift.- No graph → the plan is a v1 markdown plan and keeps the v1 protocol (§ v1 Plans below) until converted with
sdd graph convert.
The Walk Loop
The loop is claim → red → green → sync → merge, repeated until the frontier is empty. Every arrow is a CLI call whose refusal text names the fix. You never assert an outcome — you show the tool a report and it records what the report says.
- Preconditions. Plan README
statusisapprovedoractive(flipapproved→activewhen starting).sdd graph status --plan <Name>for the derived picture: state counts, closure, claims. - Claim.
sdd next Plans/<Name> --claim --by <identity>claims the heaviest claimable frontier node, records a lease, and allocates an isolated workspace (git targets: a worktree on its own branch). The printed payload carries contract, cited requirement text, named tests, hazard triage, and workspace path — don't re-read plan documents for what it already states. When nothing is claimable, react to the refusal's actual reason (capacity, BLOCKED/RED nodes, or a genuinely finished walk). - Red — prove the tests can fail. Write the node's named tests first (runner-visible ids must match the payload exactly), run them in the workspace against the unimplemented or broken state, and sync the failing report:
sdd graph sync --plan <Name> --node <id> --by <identity> --report red.xml. A red run is a successful sync — it stampsred_seq, which arms red-before-green: a hazard-discharging test never observed failing will refuse the later green. - Green — implement, commit, sync the pass. Implement inside the workspace until the named tests pass. Commit the complete slice in the workspace first — sync refuses a passing report from a dirty worktree, because the revision anchor must name the tested bytes. Then sync the passing report. A clean pass by the claim holder merges atomically: observation recorded, claim cleared, workspace released. A shared-dirty pass records provisionally instead (STALE, never GREEN) until a clean re-verify. There is no assert path.
- Integrate the slice into the mainline. The merging sync completes the claim; the VCS integration is a separate deliberate act because it can conflict, and conflicts are judgment. On git targets the workspace branch survives the release (
git branch --list 'graph/<id>-*') — merge it into the mainline checkout now. Until the bytes land on the mainline the node honestly derives STALE from the shared tree; integration self-heals it to GREEN. Integrate after every merge, before the next claim of dependent work. - Between rounds.
sdd graph statusbetween claims;sdd graph pathwhen choosing what to unblock. Command gates: run the gate's command andsdd graph sync --node <id> --command-exit <N> --command-log out.txt. Review gates: run the four-lane review flow (sdd review scaffold→ fill lanes →sdd review resolve), thensdd graph review --plan <Name> --node <gate> --artifact <frozen review path>. The artifact must beresolved+frozen: true+ verdictAligned(all three — a reopened review is not evidence), must review a document of this plan, and greens exactly one gate. Findings that name scope nodes demote them to RED in the same write — the finding doing its job, not an error to route around. Record gates after the scope's work is integrated into the mainline.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +43 lines · +23 tokens per session 87e5ecb7019d
- 4d ago First seen · 118 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A cf8536d13a46
sdd-implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository danweinerdev/claude-sdd-planner (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 3,896 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
hns-lsel-curator
Local Self-Evolution Loop (LSEL) curator — the CLUSTER + drain engine for the GOOS-local PROPOSE→APPLY seam closure (SPEC-LSEL-LOCAL-EVOLUTION-001). Companion-offset drain of .moai/lessons-inbox.jsonl with a drain-side severity filter that drops the 65% Bash-timeout/sandbox noise, eventkey clustering with a frequency…
hns-workflow-ci-loop
Unified CI watch + auto-fix loop skill. Polls gh pr checks after /moai sync PR creation, classifies required vs auxiliary failures, attempts safe automated patches (max 3 iterations), and escalates semantic failures to the user. Use for CI loop workflow — NOT for general loop iteration patterns (see…
moai-kanban-foreman
One unattended kanban foreman iteration: watch the backlog queue, dispatch the next operator-picked card to an isolated worker, collect completion evidence on read (not on claims), and report. This is the body the project's loop.md driver invokes each iteration of a bare /loop; it can also be invoked directly to test…
hns-moaiadk-patterns
Skill "hns-moaiadk-patterns" from modu-ai/moai-adk, covering moai-adk-go domain patterns, architecture quick reference, key source paths, pipeline specialist delegation map and template-first build cycle.
moai-harness-learner
Harness learning subsystem coordinator. Produces Tier 4 auto-update proposal payloads consumed by the orchestrator (which surfaces them via AskUserQuestion) and orchestrates Apply/Rollback flows. Triggers when harness learning proposals are pending or learning lifecycle management is needed.
hns-oss-docs-readme-sync
README 4-file synchronization procedure for the oss-docs harness: Korean README.ko.md as primary source, en/ja/zh derivation, the shared language-switcher header contract, section-order parity checklist, and the manual verification recipe (no linter exists for READMEs). Loaded by the content-author and…