Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add danygiguere/audit-skills --skill audit-exception-handlinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danygiguere/audit-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-exception-handling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-exception-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-exception-handling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-exception-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-exception-handling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00142 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00071 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
audit-exception-handling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read ../audit/references/correctness/exception-handling.md and apply its checklist to the code the
user specified (or the current diff if none was given). Verify each candidate
with ../audit/references/methodology/verify.md before reporting. Report findings with severity and
file:line references.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 10 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 8d7d2f6e669b
audit-exception-handling is a skill published in the GitHub repository danygiguere/audit-skills (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 142 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
AUTHOR SKILL (internal to microsoft/aspire-skills). Reviews pull requests into this repo for problems only — bugs, regressions, missing eval coverage, frontmatter or routing damage, plugin-manifest drift, hook safety, and other concrete issues. Drives a six-step workflow: identify the PR, ensure the branch is…
habit-hooks-review
Spawn a reviewer sub-agent to assess a change set against habit-hooks's coding principles. Use AFTER habit-hooks reports clean — habit-hooks catches structural smells; this catches what it cannot (correctness, tests, design, missed edge cases).
release-habit-hooks
Cut a new release of the habit-hooks packages. Use when asked to release, publish, or bump the version. Reviews what lands, enforces the in-sync versioning rule, validates the changelog, and drives the tag-triggered PyPI publish.
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now…
software-code-review
Evaluate source code for correctness, quality, security, style conformance, and maintainability, producing a structured review report with findings and recommendations. Use when the user wants to review, critique, audit, evaluate, or inspect source code — checking for bugs, logic errors, unhandled error paths…
audit-round
External-audit role for arcgentic rounds. Loaded when arcgentic state.yaml is in awaitingaudit or auditinprogress, OR when the user explicitly requests an external audit of a finished round, OR when reviewing a handoff doc + commit chain against the round's declared scope. Produces a PASS / NEEDSFIX / AUDITINCOMPLETE…