Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add danygiguere/audit-skills --skill audit-fix-authzgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danygiguere/audit-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-fix-authz)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-fix-authz"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-fix-authz/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-fix-authz"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-fix-authz.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00093 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00037 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
audit-fix-authz scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read ../audit/references/remediation/authz-patterns.md and apply its patterns to fix the
confirmed findings the user referenced. Make the smallest change that restores
the invariant, and keep style consistent with the surrounding code.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +1 lines f64b38bcffce
- 2mo ago First seen · 9 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 76c1e14c5915
audit-fix-authz is a skill published in the GitHub repository danygiguere/audit-skills (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 93 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Rigorous review of OWASP Cheat Sheet Series pull requests across security correctness, practicality, link and source verification, duplication, and language. Use for any pull request that touches cheatsheets/ or cheatsheetsdraft/, or that adds or changes external links or citations.
pr-review
AUTHOR SKILL (internal to microsoft/aspire-skills). Reviews pull requests into this repo for problems only — bugs, regressions, missing eval coverage, frontmatter or routing damage, plugin-manifest drift, hook safety, and other concrete issues. Drives a six-step workflow: identify the PR, ensure the branch is…
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now…
oak-adversarial-review
Use for every final review of a diff - an independent pass that assumes the change is wrong, accounts for every changed file, attacks it along fixed dimensions, fact-checks its own findings and ends in an explicit verdict. Use also when the user asks for a red-team or devil's-advocate review.
habit-hooks-review
Spawn a reviewer sub-agent to assess a change set against habit-hooks's coding principles. Use AFTER habit-hooks reports clean — habit-hooks catches structural smells; this catches what it cannot (correctness, tests, design, missed edge cases).
release-habit-hooks
Cut a new release of the habit-hooks packages. Use when asked to release, publish, or bump the version. Reviews what lands, enforces the in-sync versioning rule, validates the changelog, and drives the tag-triggered PyPI publish.