Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add danygiguere/audit-skills --skill audit-nplus1git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danygiguere/audit-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-nplus1)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-nplus1"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-nplus1/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-nplus1"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/danygiguere/audit-skills/audit-nplus1.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00111 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00022 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
audit-nplus1 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read ../audit/references/operability/nplus1.md and apply its checklist to the code the
user specified (or the current diff if none was given). Verify each candidate
with ../audit/references/methodology/verify.md before reporting. Report findings with severity and
file:line references.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 10 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 3435d546b6c0
audit-nplus1 is a skill published in the GitHub repository danygiguere/audit-skills (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 111 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
query-review
Review an authorized codebase for ORM misuse, N+1 query patterns, authorization-after-fetch bugs, raw SQL risks, cache key collisions, and missing tenant scopes. Use for data-access layers and security-adjacent performance pitfalls.
triage-contributor-pr
Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/prisma and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version…
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
no-bare-casts
Writing as in TypeScript or TSX production code, modifying a file that contains a bare as cast, silencing a type error with a cast, encountering as unknown as, or reviewing a cast site.
review-prs
Review a GitHub pull request in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo against the team's reviewer checklist: PR title/description conventions, linked issue, logic errors and unhandled edge cases, breaking changes, test coverage, docs updates, security (input handling), and new dependencies. Use whenever a maintainer asks…
migration-review
Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.