Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add daringanitch/claude-stock-analyst --skill stock-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/daringanitch/claude-stock-analystWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/daringanitch/claude-stock-analyst/stock-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/daringanitch/claude-stock-analyst/stock-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/daringanitch/claude-stock-analyst/stock-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/daringanitch/claude-stock-analyst/stock-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/daringanitch/claude-stock-analyst/stock-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00201 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00101 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
stock-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Score management across 5 dimensions (1–10 each):
- CAPITAL ALLOCATION — buybacks at good prices? Acquisitions that created value? Dividend discipline?
- OPERATIONAL EXECUTION — do they hit guidance? Consistent margin improvement?
- CANDOR — do they tell you bad news clearly or bury it? Check last 3 earnings calls.
- SKIN IN THE GAME — insider ownership %, recent buys/sells, compensation structure aligned with shareholders?
- LONG-TERM THINKING — R&D investment, willingness to sacrifice short-term EPS for moat-building?
Total score: /50. Anything below 30 requires a significant valuation discount.
Flag any specific incidents: missed guidance, misleading disclosures, related-party transactions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 17 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A d915915a10d8
stock-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository daringanitch/claude-stock-analyst (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 201 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
equity-research
A Chinese-language guide for researching and valuing a publicly traded company's stock. It describes how to produce an institutional-style equity research report covering evidence, valuation, risks, expectations, and possible investment actions.
serenity-chokepoint-investing
Analyze public equities and sectors using the Serenity-style AI supply-chain chokepoint investing framework. Best for AI infrastructure, semiconductors, optical communications, data center power, storage, cooling, robotics, and industrial supply-chain bottleneck research.
grayscale-crypto-sectors
Use when evaluating crypto through a Grayscale-style Crypto Sectors lens: sector taxonomy, FTSE/Grayscale index eligibility, fee/usage fundamentals, sector-share valuation, ETP/trust wrappers, and Zcash-style privacy-as-money theses.
ansem-crypto
Use when evaluating crypto narratives, attention rotation, memecoin cycles, Solana-style ecosystem momentum, social distribution, and reflexive retail flows in an Ansem-style crypto market framework.
livermore
Use when evaluating trend-following trades, pivotal-point breakouts, pyramiding, stop discipline, or whether a liquid market is acting right in a Jesse Livermore style.
a16z-techno-optimist
Use when evaluating startups or tech platforms through an a16z-style lens: technology adoption, market creation, platform power, AI/crypto/software narratives, and bold long-duration tech bets.