Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dark-Alex-17/coyote --skill security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dark-Alex-17/coyoteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dark-alex-17/coyote/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dark-alex-17/coyote/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dark-alex-17/coyote/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dark-alex-17/coyote/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dark-alex-17/coyote/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.02081 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.01040 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00416 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00208 |
Grade C, and why
security-review scanned grade C with 3 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reaches for credential filesmediumPrivilege escalation
SSH keys, cloud credentials, git-credentials, .npmrc, /etc/shadow: reading these is how a config file becomes a credential leak.
Every finding MUST cite file:line and name the concrete attack path or hazard. "This might be insecure" is noise; `🟠 Path traversal — export.rs:88 — 'name' from the HTTP body is joined into the output path with no canon Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Downloads and executes remote codemediumSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
7. **Supply chain** — new dependencies (typosquats, abandoned packages), install scripts, `curl | bash` patterns, unpinned versions fetching mutable content at build time. Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
7. **Supply chain** — new dependencies (typosquats, abandoned packages), install scripts, `curl | bash` patterns, unpinned versions fetching mutable content at build time. The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 104 lines · 100 tokens per session scan C 426bc3a6922c
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dark-Alex-17/coyote (57 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 2,081 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 3 findings (reaches for credential files, downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.