Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add darrencroton/ai-agent-coder --skill scoped-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/darrencroton/ai-agent-coderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/darrencroton/ai-agent-coder/scoped-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/darrencroton/ai-agent-coder/scoped-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/darrencroton/ai-agent-coder/scoped-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/darrencroton/ai-agent-coder/scoped-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/darrencroton/ai-agent-coder/scoped-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00852 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00341 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
scoped-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scoped Implementation
Use this skill when a plan already exists and the job is to implement one narrow slice without redrawing the lane.
Preconditions
Before coding, identify the frozen contract:
- intended slice
- acceptance criteria
- allowed files/functions/components
- tests allowed or expected to change
- explicit non-goals
- risky surfaces and approval status
- validation plan
- rollback path
If the contract is missing or too vague, stop after drafting a candidate contract and ask the user to approve it. Do not implement a non-trivial change without an auditable slice.
When the style-guide skill is available in this session, load its applicable standard here, before writing code — see its write mode: the project's own drafted guide if one exists, or its baseline otherwise. This is the point where style guidance is worth the most and costs the least: it shapes code as it is written instead of flagging it afterward. No separate skill invocation is required; reading the relevant portions is cheap enough to fold into this step. When style-guide is not available in this session, this step is skipped — scoped-implementation remains fully self-contained and follows the project's own documented conventions and dominant local pattern, as it already does for every other aspect of the code it writes.
Workflow
- Confirm contract - restate the authorized surface and non-goals briefly.
- Check starting state - inspect
git statusand relevant files. Do not overwrite unrelated user changes. - Implement only the slice - keep edits inside the authorized files/functions. Do not perform opportunistic cleanup.
- Validate - run the targeted checks from the contract. Add or update tests when the contract requires it. Then run the
lintskill differentially against the slice's starting commit (check --base <ref>) and account for every new finding: fix it inside the authorized surface, or record why it stands. If a fix needs an unauthorized file, stop and report rather than widening the surface. Report an uncovered language as a gap, never as a pass. - Prepare drift audit input - collect the frozen contract, changed files, diff summary, and validation results for the user's next explicit call to the drift-audit skill.
- Report receipt - finish with the implementation receipt below. Do not run the drift-audit skill as part of this skill unless the user explicitly calls both skills in the same request.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 8076ed7ec367
- 2mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A c536146ee2db
scoped-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository darrencroton/ai-agent-coder (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 852 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…