OpenAgents Control is a framework that adds plan-first, approval-based coding workflows to OpenCode, an AI coding framework. Developers and teams use it to make agents follow shared coding patterns, work across several programming languages, and validate changes through testing and review. The catalogue includes its agents, skills, commands, plugin, and hook.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/darrenhinde/openagentscontrol/verification-before-completionnpx skills add darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl --skill verification-before-completiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/darrenhinde/openagentscontrol/verification-before-completion)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/darrenhinde/openagentscontrol/verification-before-completion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/darrenhinde/openagentscontrol/verification-before-completion.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00745 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00373 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
verification-before-completion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to verification-before-completion — 30 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verification Before Completion
Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
The Iron Law
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
The Gate Function
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
Red Flags — STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- ANY wording implying success without having run verification
Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 113 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 3eb50937baed
verification-before-completion is a skill published in the GitHub repository darrenhinde/OpenAgentsControl (4,820 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 745 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to verification-before-completion, differing in 30 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
azure-openai-to-responses
Migrate Python apps from Azure OpenAI Chat Completions to the Responses API. Covers AzureOpenAI/AsyncAzureOpenAI client migration to the v1 endpoint, streaming, tools, structured output, multi-turn, EntraID auth, and model compatibility checks. Python-focused, Azure OpenAI-specific. USE FOR: migrate to responses API…
knowledge-base
Create and maintain a Markdown knowledge base that any AI agent can read, search, and update. Use when the user wants to start a knowledge base, add or update notes, organize docs/notes for an agent or LLM to consume, build an index of notes, or run a cleanup/maintenance pass on an existing MD knowledge base. Triggers…
build-teaql-app
Build or change a TeaQL application in Java, Rust, Go, Swift, Python, C#/.NET, or TypeScript, including Kotlin/JVM applications that consume Java-generated libraries. Mandatory order: first draft and save a complete KSML model, then verify the client and evaluate that saved model, repair it through repeated evaluation…
dd-code-generation
Use pup CLI for immediate Datadog operations or generate code for integration into applications.
taiyi-ui-design
TaiyiForge 第 4 阶段 — UI/UX 契约，产出 UI-DESIGN.md。四端通用。.
taiyi-evolve
TaiyiForge 辅助 — 实现后架构与文档同步（architecture-sync）。OpenCode / Claude / Codex / Cursor 通用。.