review-plan

review-plan is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from DasDigitaleMomentum/opencode-processing-skills. It costs 37 tokens per session (1,471 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A quality check for a project plan, performed by an independent reviewer. It checks whether the plan matches the requirements, stays within scope, and includes enough detail to carry out.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after creating a plan when you want severity-rated findings about its completeness, scope, requirements coverage, and testing approach.
Why use it?
It helps catch missing work, unnecessary tasks, unclear steps, and weak testing plans before implementation begins.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/dasdigitalemomentum/opencode-processing-skills/review-plan
Any agent
npx skills add DasDigitaleMomentum/opencode-processing-skills --skill review-plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DasDigitaleMomentum/opencode-processing-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-plan

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dasdigitalemomentum/opencode-processing-skills/review-plan.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dasdigitalemomentum/opencode-processing-skills/review-plan)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dasdigitalemomentum/opencode-processing-skills/review-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dasdigitalemomentum/opencode-processing-skills/review-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,471 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00037 $0.01471
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00736
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00294
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00147

Measured 5d ago against content hash 842ca064a74d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/review-plan/SKILL.md · 148 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Skill: Review Plan

This skill provides an independent quality gate for plans created via create-plan.

A fresh reviewer (with no authoring context) evaluates the plan against structured criteria. The review is persisted as a plan artifact for traceability.


When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • A plan has been created via create-plan and you want to validate it before proceeding.
  • You want a second opinion on plan quality (scope clarity, DoD, testing strategy, etc.).
  • The user explicitly requests a plan review.

Do not use this skill to:

  • Review implementation plans (use review-implementation-plan).
  • Review completed implementations (use review-implementation).
  • Fix or rewrite the plan (the reviewer only reports findings; the primary decides how to act).

Review Focus

The default priority is the smallest complete scope: confirm that requested outcomes are covered and that no phase or material deliverable is unauthorized, unnecessary, or needlessly separate. Inspect the relevant plan elements, but record only evidence-backed exceptions. The primary may add a focus via {{focus}}.

Review posture

Detect existing gold-plating without becoming an adversarial reviewer. A scope-reduction finding must identify a concrete planned item and show missing authorization, missing present necessity, or a smaller path that remains complete: the requested behavior must still work, affected real paths must still integrate, and applicable existing invariants must be preserved. Scope discipline is not permission to omit necessary work. Do not invent requirements, ideal architectures, hardening, infrastructure, or findings. Zero findings remains valid.

DoD wording, testing, references, documentation, and other formal criteria are not checklist obligations. Report them only when a concrete defect would block or misdirect execution.


Execution Model

Roles

  • Primary (maintainer)
    • Invokes the review skill.
    • Delegates the review to delegate-strong (default) or general (for same-model perspective).
    • Receives the review summary and decides on follow-up actions.
    • Updates the plan via update-plan if findings require changes.

Read the full file on GitHub · 148 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 148 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 842ca064a74d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository DasDigitaleMomentum/opencode-processing-skills (58 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,471 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens

chronicle

Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…

microsoft/vscode · 72 tokens