Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add databar-ai/databar-mcp-server --skill databar-enrichmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/databar-ai/databar-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/databar-ai/databar-mcp-server/databar-enrichment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/databar-ai/databar-mcp-server/databar-enrichment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/databar-ai/databar-mcp-server/databar-enrichment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/databar-ai/databar-mcp-server/databar-enrichment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/databar-ai/databar-mcp-server/databar-enrichment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01416 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00566 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00283 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
databar-enrichment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Databar Single Enrichment
Run a data enrichment on Databar.ai to look up information about a person, company, email, phone number, or any other entity using 100+ data providers.
Workflow
-
Extract the intent. Identify what the user wants to look up and what entity type it is (person, company, email, phone, domain, etc.).
-
Search for the right enrichment. Call
search_enrichmentswith a descriptive query.- For people: try queries like "linkedin profile", "person lookup", "contact info"
- For companies: "company data", "domain lookup", "technographics"
- For emails: "email finder", "email verification"
- For phones: "phone lookup", "mobile number"
- Use the
categoryfilter when helpful:people,company,email,phone,social,financial,verification
-
Inspect the enrichment before running. Call
get_enrichment_detailswith theenrichment_idfrom step 2. Check:- Required parameters — make sure you have all of them from the user's input
- Price — note the credit cost
- If you're missing a required parameter, ask the user for it
- For each param, check
type_fieldandchoices:type_field: "select"— the param expects one value from a fixed listtype_field: "mselect"— the param expects an array of values from a fixed list
-
Resolve choices for select/mselect params. If a param has a
choicesobject, you must pass a validid(not the display name).choices.mode = "inline"— valid options are inchoices.items[].id. Pick from there directly.choices.mode = "remote"— callget_param_choices({ enrichment_id, param_name })to fetch valid options. Useqto search if the list is large (e.g. countries, industries). Always pass theidfield, not thename.
-
Confirm cost with the user. Tell the user: "This will cost {price} credits using {enrichment_name}. Proceed?" If the user has not confirmed willingness to spend credits, always ask first.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 48f9ba26f51c
databar-enrichment is a skill published in the GitHub repository databar-ai/databar-mcp-server (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,416 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
databar-enrichment compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| databar-enrichmentdatabar-ai/databar-mcp-server | Skill | 5 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 59 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | today | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 314k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |