Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill compliance-reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadog-labs/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadog-labs/agent-skills/compliance-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadog-labs/agent-skills/compliance-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadog-labs/agent-skills/compliance-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadog-labs/agent-skills/compliance-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadog-labs/agent-skills/compliance-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01683 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00842 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00337 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
dd-audit-compliance-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- dd-audit-compliance-report — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit Trail: Compliance Evidence Report
Generate auditor-ready evidence from Datadog Audit Trail for SOC 2 and PCI DSS control requirements.
Prerequisites
pup auth login # OAuth2 (recommended)
# or set DD_API_KEY + DD_APP_KEY with audit_logs_read scope
Read First
See references/control-mapping.md for the full control → query mapping table and retention requirements by framework.
Retention Check (Run First)
PCI requires 12 months. Datadog default retention is 90 days. Check whether archive is configured:
pup audit-logs search --query "@evt.name:\"Audit Trail\" @action:modified" --from 90d -o json \
| jq '[.data[] | {
timestamp: .attributes.timestamp,
user: .attributes.attributes.usr.email,
action: .attributes.attributes.action,
resource: .attributes.attributes.asset.type
}]'
If the requested time window exceeds 90 days and no archive is confirmed, surface this gap in the report header.
Workflow
- Confirm: framework (SOC 2 / PCI DSS), time window, org scope
- Run retention check
- Run each relevant control query
- Format output using the Evidence Report template
SOC 2 Queries
CC6.2 — User Provisioning / Deprovisioning
pup audit-logs search \
--query "@evt.name:\"Access Management\" @asset.type:user @action:(created OR deleted OR modified)" \
--from PERIOD_START --to PERIOD_END --limit 500 -o json \
| jq '[.data[] | {
timestamp: .attributes.timestamp,
actor: .attributes.attributes.usr.email,
action: .attributes.attributes.action,
affected_user: .attributes.attributes.asset.id
}]'
CC6.3 — Role and Permission Changes
pup audit-logs search \
--query "@evt.name:\"Access Management\" @asset.type:role" \
--from PERIOD_START --to PERIOD_END --limit 500 -o json \
| jq '[.data[] | {
timestamp: .attributes.timestamp,
actor: .attributes.attributes.usr.email,
action: .attributes.attributes.action,
role_id: .attributes.attributes.asset.id
}]'
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 226 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 71bcd96f0d71
dd-audit-compliance-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadog-labs/agent-skills (168 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,683 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…