Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill bid-analysis-comparatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/bid-analysis-comparator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/bid-analysis-comparator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/bid-analysis-comparator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/bid-analysis-comparator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/bid-analysis-comparator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01447 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00579 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00289 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
bid-analysis-comparator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- bid-analysis-comparator — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bid Analysis Comparator
Business Case
Bid evaluation requires systematic comparison across multiple criteria. This skill provides structured bid analysis and scoring.
Technical Implementation
import pandas as pd
from datetime import date
from typing import Dict, Any, List
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
class BidStatus(Enum):
RECEIVED = "received"
UNDER_REVIEW = "under_review"
SHORTLISTED = "shortlisted"
AWARDED = "awarded"
REJECTED = "rejected"
@dataclass
class EvaluationCriteria:
name: str
weight: float # 0-1
max_score: int = 10
@dataclass
class BidScore:
criteria: str
score: int
notes: str = ""
@dataclass
class Bid:
bid_id: str
bidder_name: str
bid_package: str
submitted_date: date
base_bid: float
alternates: Dict[str, float]
status: BidStatus
scores: List[BidScore] = field(default_factory=list)
qualifications: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
exclusions: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
@property
def total_weighted_score(self) -> float:
return sum(s.score for s in self.scores)
class BidAnalysisComparator:
def __init__(self, project_name: str, bid_package: str):
self.project_name = project_name
self.bid_package = bid_package
self.bids: Dict[str, Bid] = {}
self.criteria: List[EvaluationCriteria] = []
self._setup_default_criteria()
self._counter = 0
def _setup_default_criteria(self):
self.criteria = [
EvaluationCriteria("Price", 0.35),
EvaluationCriteria("Experience", 0.20),
EvaluationCriteria("Schedule", 0.15),
EvaluationCriteria("Safety Record", 0.10),
EvaluationCriteria("References", 0.10),
EvaluationCriteria("Capacity", 0.10)
]
def add_bid(self, bidder_name: str, base_bid: float,
submitted_date: date = None,
alternates: Dict[str, float] = None) -> Bid:
self._counter += 1
bid_id = f"BID-{self._counter:03d}"
bid = Bid(
bid_id=bid_id,
bidder_name=bidder_name,
bid_package=self.bid_package,
submitted_date=submitted_date or date.today(),
base_bid=base_bid,
alternates=alternates or {},
status=BidStatus.RECEIVED
)
self.bids[bid_id] = bid
return bid
def score_bid(self, bid_id: str, scores: Dict[str, int]):
"""Score bid on criteria. scores = {'Price': 8, 'Experience': 7, ...}"""
if bid_id not in self.bids:
return
bid = self.bids[bid_id]
bid.scores = []
for criteria, score in scores.items():
bid.scores.append(BidScore(criteria, score))
bid.status = BidStatus.UNDER_REVIEW
def calculate_weighted_scores(self) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Calculate weighted scores for all bids."""
results = []
criteria_weights = {c.name: c.weight for c in self.criteria}
for bid in self.bids.values():
row = {
'Bidder': bid.bidder_name,
'Base Bid': bid.base_bid,
'Status': bid.status.value
}
total = 0
for score in bid.scores:
weight = criteria_weights.get(score.criteria, 0)
weighted = score.score * weight * 10
row[score.criteria] = score.score
row[f'{score.criteria} (W)'] = round(weighted, 1)
total += weighted
row['Total Score'] = round(total, 1)
results.append(row)
return pd.DataFrame(results).sort_values('Total Score', ascending=False)
def get_recommendation(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Get bid recommendation."""
df = self.calculate_weighted_scores()
if df.empty:
return {'recommendation': 'No bids to evaluate'}
top = df.iloc[0]
lowest = df.sort_values('Base Bid').iloc[0]
return {
'highest_score': {
'bidder': top['Bidder'],
'score': top['Total Score'],
'bid': top['Base Bid']
},
'lowest_price': {
'bidder': lowest['Bidder'],
'bid': lowest['Base Bid']
},
'total_bids': len(self.bids),
'recommendation': top['Bidder']
}
def export_analysis(self, output_path: str):
df = self.calculate_weighted_scores()
with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Comparison', index=False)
# Bid details
details = [{
'Bidder': b.bidder_name,
'Bid': b.base_bid,
'Exclusions': '; '.join(b.exclusions),
'Qualifications': '; '.join(b.qualifications)
} for b in self.bids.values()]
pd.DataFrame(details).to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Details', index=False)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 190 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A dcf683a140dd
bid-analysis-comparator is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (373 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,447 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
process-mapper
Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being…
design-handoff-brief
Transform feature briefs into structured design briefs that give designers the context they need before opening Figma. Use when asked to write a design brief, create a design handoff, brief a designer on a new feature, or translate a PRD into design requirements. Produces a brief with user goal, emotional context…
estimating-and-contingency
Produces a cost or effort estimate someone can defend — decomposing the work, choosing between analogous, parametric and bottom-up methods, documenting the basis and its assumptions, expressing confidence as a range, and sizing contingency and management reserve separately. Use this to build an estimate, challenge one…
scenario-team-admin
Use when administering a Scenario team from an agent through MCP: restricting which models a team or project can run (model access control, allowlist, blocklist), inviting or removing team and project members, changing roles, capping a member's Creative Unit spend, creating or deleting projects, auditing API keys and…
rice-impact-matrix
Califica iniciativas usando tanto RICE como alineación estratégica para una priorización matizada. Úsalo cuando te pidan priorizar características, construir una matriz de prioridades, combinar puntuación cuantitativa con ajuste estratégico, o decidir qué construir después con múltiples iniciativas en competencia.…
requirement-forge-refiner
Facilitate a structured conversation to define requirement standards for a project — epic and feature definitions, scenario structure, AC format, priority notation, status workflow, and naming conventions. Produces a formal requirement-standards.md that the requirement-quality atom reads via config resolution…