Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill cwicr-comparison-toolgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-comparison-tool)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-comparison-tool"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-comparison-tool/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-comparison-tool"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-comparison-tool.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.03608 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01443 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00722 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00361 |
Grade A, and why
cwicr-comparison-tool scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- cwicr-comparison-tool — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 488 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CWICR Comparison Tool
Business Case
Problem Statement
Project stakeholders need to compare:
- Alternative design options
- Estimate versions over time
- Projects against benchmarks
- Actual vs estimated costs
Solution
Structured comparison of CWICR-based estimates with variance analysis, benchmarking, and visual reporting.
Business Value
- Decision support - Compare alternatives objectively
- Version control - Track estimate evolution
- Benchmarking - Compare against standards
- Audit - Document estimate changes
Technical Implementation
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional, Tuple
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from datetime import datetime
from enum import Enum
class ComparisonType(Enum):
"""Types of comparisons."""
VERSION = "version" # Same project, different versions
ALTERNATIVE = "alternative" # Same project, design alternatives
BENCHMARK = "benchmark" # Project vs standard/benchmark
ACTUAL = "actual" # Estimate vs actual costs
PROJECT = "project" # Different projects
class VarianceSignificance(Enum):
"""Significance level of variance."""
CRITICAL = "critical" # >20% variance
HIGH = "high" # 10-20%
MEDIUM = "medium" # 5-10%
LOW = "low" # <5%
NONE = "none" # No variance
@dataclass
class ComparisonItem:
"""Single item comparison."""
work_item_code: str
description: str
base_quantity: float
base_cost: float
compare_quantity: float
compare_cost: float
quantity_variance: float
quantity_variance_pct: float
cost_variance: float
cost_variance_pct: float
significance: VarianceSignificance
@dataclass
class ComparisonResult:
"""Complete comparison result."""
comparison_type: ComparisonType
base_name: str
compare_name: str
base_total: float
compare_total: float
total_variance: float
total_variance_pct: float
items: List[ComparisonItem]
summary_by_category: Dict[str, Dict[str, float]]
created_at: datetime
class CWICRComparisonTool:
"""Compare CWICR-based estimates."""
SIGNIFICANCE_THRESHOLDS = {
VarianceSignificance.CRITICAL: 0.20,
VarianceSignificance.HIGH: 0.10,
VarianceSignificance.MEDIUM: 0.05,
VarianceSignificance.LOW: 0.01
}
def __init__(self):
pass
def _get_significance(self, variance_pct: float) -> VarianceSignificance:
"""Determine variance significance."""
abs_var = abs(variance_pct) / 100
if abs_var >= self.SIGNIFICANCE_THRESHOLDS[VarianceSignificance.CRITICAL]:
return VarianceSignificance.CRITICAL
elif abs_var >= self.SIGNIFICANCE_THRESHOLDS[VarianceSignificance.HIGH]:
return VarianceSignificance.HIGH
elif abs_var >= self.SIGNIFICANCE_THRESHOLDS[VarianceSignificance.MEDIUM]:
return VarianceSignificance.MEDIUM
elif abs_var >= self.SIGNIFICANCE_THRESHOLDS[VarianceSignificance.LOW]:
return VarianceSignificance.LOW
else:
return VarianceSignificance.NONE
def compare_estimates(self,
base_df: pd.DataFrame,
compare_df: pd.DataFrame,
base_name: str = "Base",
compare_name: str = "Compare",
comparison_type: ComparisonType = ComparisonType.VERSION,
code_column: str = 'work_item_code',
quantity_column: str = 'quantity',
cost_column: str = 'total_cost') -> ComparisonResult:
"""Compare two estimates."""
# Merge on code
merged = base_df.merge(
compare_df,
on=code_column,
how='outer',
suffixes=('_base', '_compare')
)
items = []
for _, row in merged.iterrows():
base_qty = float(row.get(f'{quantity_column}_base', 0) or 0)
base_cost = float(row.get(f'{cost_column}_base', 0) or 0)
compare_qty = float(row.get(f'{quantity_column}_compare', 0) or 0)
compare_cost = float(row.get(f'{cost_column}_compare', 0) or 0)
qty_variance = compare_qty - base_qty
qty_variance_pct = (qty_variance / base_qty * 100) if base_qty > 0 else (100 if compare_qty > 0 else 0)
cost_variance = compare_cost - base_cost
cost_variance_pct = (cost_variance / base_cost * 100) if base_cost > 0 else (100 if compare_cost > 0 else 0)
items.append(ComparisonItem(
work_item_code=str(row.get(code_column, '')),
description=str(row.get('description_base', row.get('description_compare', ''))),
base_quantity=base_qty,
base_cost=base_cost,
compare_quantity=compare_qty,
compare_cost=compare_cost,
quantity_variance=round(qty_variance, 2),
quantity_variance_pct=round(qty_variance_pct, 1),
cost_variance=round(cost_variance, 2),
cost_variance_pct=round(cost_variance_pct, 1),
significance=self._get_significance(cost_variance_pct)
))
# Totals
base_total = sum(i.base_cost for i in items)
compare_total = sum(i.compare_cost for i in items)
total_variance = compare_total - base_total
total_variance_pct = (total_variance / base_total * 100) if base_total > 0 else 0
# Summary by category
summary_by_category = self._summarize_by_category(items, merged)
return ComparisonResult(
comparison_type=comparison_type,
base_name=base_name,
compare_name=compare_name,
base_total=round(base_total, 2),
compare_total=round(compare_total, 2),
total_variance=round(total_variance, 2),
total_variance_pct=round(total_variance_pct, 1),
items=items,
summary_by_category=summary_by_category,
created_at=datetime.now()
)
def _summarize_by_category(self,
items: List[ComparisonItem],
merged_df: pd.DataFrame) -> Dict[str, Dict[str, float]]:
"""Summarize comparison by category."""
summary = {}
# Try to extract category from work item code prefix
for item in items:
code = item.work_item_code
category = code.split('-')[0] if '-' in code else 'Other'
if category not in summary:
summary[category] = {
'base_cost': 0,
'compare_cost': 0,
'variance': 0,
'variance_pct': 0,
'item_count': 0
}
summary[category]['base_cost'] += item.base_cost
summary[category]['compare_cost'] += item.compare_cost
summary[category]['variance'] += item.cost_variance
summary[category]['item_count'] += 1
# Calculate percentages
for category in summary:
base = summary[category]['base_cost']
if base > 0:
summary[category]['variance_pct'] = round(
summary[category]['variance'] / base * 100, 1
)
return summary
def get_significant_variances(self,
result: ComparisonResult,
min_significance: VarianceSignificance = VarianceSignificance.MEDIUM) -> List[ComparisonItem]:
"""Get items with significant variances."""
significance_order = [
VarianceSignificance.CRITICAL,
VarianceSignificance.HIGH,
VarianceSignificance.MEDIUM,
VarianceSignificance.LOW,
VarianceSignificance.NONE
]
min_index = significance_order.index(min_significance)
significant = [
item for item in result.items
if significance_order.index(item.significance) <= min_index
]
return sorted(significant, key=lambda x: abs(x.cost_variance), reverse=True)
def compare_multiple(self,
estimates: List[Tuple[str, pd.DataFrame]],
base_index: int = 0) -> Dict[str, ComparisonResult]:
"""Compare multiple estimates against base."""
base_name, base_df = estimates[base_index]
results = {}
for i, (name, df) in enumerate(estimates):
if i == base_index:
continue
result = self.compare_estimates(
base_df=base_df,
compare_df=df,
base_name=base_name,
compare_name=name,
comparison_type=ComparisonType.ALTERNATIVE
)
results[name] = result
return results
def benchmark_comparison(self,
project_df: pd.DataFrame,
benchmark_df: pd.DataFrame,
project_name: str,
benchmark_name: str = "Industry Benchmark") -> ComparisonResult:
"""Compare project against benchmark."""
return self.compare_estimates(
base_df=benchmark_df,
compare_df=project_df,
base_name=benchmark_name,
compare_name=project_name,
comparison_type=ComparisonType.BENCHMARK
)
def version_comparison(self,
versions: List[Tuple[str, pd.DataFrame]]) -> List[ComparisonResult]:
"""Compare sequential versions."""
results = []
for i in range(1, len(versions)):
prev_name, prev_df = versions[i-1]
curr_name, curr_df = versions[i]
result = self.compare_estimates(
base_df=prev_df,
compare_df=curr_df,
base_name=prev_name,
compare_name=curr_name,
comparison_type=ComparisonType.VERSION
)
results.append(result)
return results
def export_comparison(self,
result: ComparisonResult,
output_path: str) -> str:
"""Export comparison to Excel."""
with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
# Summary
summary_df = pd.DataFrame([{
'Comparison Type': result.comparison_type.value,
'Base': result.base_name,
'Compare': result.compare_name,
'Base Total': result.base_total,
'Compare Total': result.compare_total,
'Variance': result.total_variance,
'Variance %': result.total_variance_pct,
'Generated': result.created_at.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M')
}])
summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)
# Details
details_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Work Item': i.work_item_code,
'Description': i.description,
f'{result.base_name} Qty': i.base_quantity,
f'{result.base_name} Cost': i.base_cost,
f'{result.compare_name} Qty': i.compare_quantity,
f'{result.compare_name} Cost': i.compare_cost,
'Qty Variance': i.quantity_variance,
'Qty Variance %': i.quantity_variance_pct,
'Cost Variance': i.cost_variance,
'Cost Variance %': i.cost_variance_pct,
'Significance': i.significance.value
}
for i in result.items
])
details_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Details', index=False)
# By Category
cat_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Category': cat,
'Base Cost': data['base_cost'],
'Compare Cost': data['compare_cost'],
'Variance': data['variance'],
'Variance %': data['variance_pct'],
'Items': data['item_count']
}
for cat, data in result.summary_by_category.items()
])
cat_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='By Category', index=False)
# Significant Variances
significant = self.get_significant_variances(result)
sig_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Work Item': i.work_item_code,
'Description': i.description,
'Cost Variance': i.cost_variance,
'Variance %': i.cost_variance_pct,
'Significance': i.significance.value
}
for i in significant
])
sig_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Significant', index=False)
return output_path
class ComparisonAnalytics:
"""Analytics for comparison results."""
def __init__(self, comparison_tool: CWICRComparisonTool):
self.tool = comparison_tool
def variance_distribution(self, result: ComparisonResult) -> Dict[str, int]:
"""Get distribution of variance significance."""
distribution = {s.value: 0 for s in VarianceSignificance}
for item in result.items:
distribution[item.significance.value] += 1
return distribution
def top_variances(self,
result: ComparisonResult,
n: int = 10,
positive: bool = True) -> List[ComparisonItem]:
"""Get top N variances (positive or negative)."""
if positive:
sorted_items = sorted(result.items, key=lambda x: x.cost_variance, reverse=True)
else:
sorted_items = sorted(result.items, key=lambda x: x.cost_variance)
return sorted_items[:n]
def category_impact(self, result: ComparisonResult) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Analyze which categories contribute most to variance."""
data = []
for cat, values in result.summary_by_category.items():
contribution_pct = (values['variance'] / result.total_variance * 100) if result.total_variance != 0 else 0
data.append({
'Category': cat,
'Variance': values['variance'],
'Contribution %': round(contribution_pct, 1)
})
return pd.DataFrame(data).sort_values('Contribution %', ascending=False)
def trend_analysis(self,
version_results: List[ComparisonResult]) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Analyze cost trend across versions."""
data = []
cumulative = 0
for result in version_results:
cumulative += result.total_variance
data.append({
'From': result.base_name,
'To': result.compare_name,
'Variance': result.total_variance,
'Variance %': result.total_variance_pct,
'Cumulative Variance': cumulative
})
return pd.DataFrame(data)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 488 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 91faa2d8227a
cwicr-comparison-tool is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (373 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 3,608 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
process-mapper
Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being…
design-handoff-brief
Transform feature briefs into structured design briefs that give designers the context they need before opening Figma. Use when asked to write a design brief, create a design handoff, brief a designer on a new feature, or translate a PRD into design requirements. Produces a brief with user goal, emotional context…
estimating-and-contingency
Produces a cost or effort estimate someone can defend — decomposing the work, choosing between analogous, parametric and bottom-up methods, documenting the basis and its assumptions, expressing confidence as a range, and sizing contingency and management reserve separately. Use this to build an estimate, challenge one…
scenario-team-admin
Use when administering a Scenario team from an agent through MCP: restricting which models a team or project can run (model access control, allowlist, blocklist), inviting or removing team and project members, changing roles, capping a member's Creative Unit spend, creating or deleting projects, auditing API keys and…
rice-impact-matrix
Califica iniciativas usando tanto RICE como alineación estratégica para una priorización matizada. Úsalo cuando te pidan priorizar características, construir una matriz de prioridades, combinar puntuación cuantitativa con ajuste estratégico, o decidir qué construir después con múltiples iniciativas en competencia.…
requirement-forge-refiner
Facilitate a structured conversation to define requirement standards for a project — epic and feature definitions, scenario structure, AC format, priority notation, status workflow, and naming conventions. Produces a formal requirement-standards.md that the requirement-quality atom reads via config resolution…