Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill cwicr-data-validatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-data-validator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-data-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-data-validator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-data-validator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-data-validator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.03115 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01558 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00623 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00312 |
Grade A, and why
cwicr-data-validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- cwicr-data-validator — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 438 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CWICR Data Validator
Business Case
Problem Statement
Data quality issues cause:
- Incorrect estimates
- Budget overruns
- Delayed projects
- Rework costs
Solution
Systematic validation of CWICR data and estimate inputs to catch errors, outliers, and inconsistencies before they impact projects.
Business Value
- Error prevention - Catch issues early
- Data quality - Ensure reliable estimates
- Consistency - Standard validation rules
- Audit trail - Document data issues
Technical Implementation
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional, Tuple
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from datetime import datetime
class ValidationSeverity(Enum):
"""Validation issue severity."""
ERROR = "error" # Must fix
WARNING = "warning" # Should review
INFO = "info" # For awareness
class ValidationCategory(Enum):
"""Validation categories."""
MISSING_DATA = "missing_data"
INVALID_VALUE = "invalid_value"
OUTLIER = "outlier"
DUPLICATE = "duplicate"
INCONSISTENT = "inconsistent"
FORMAT = "format"
@dataclass
class ValidationIssue:
"""Single validation issue."""
field: str
record_id: str
category: ValidationCategory
severity: ValidationSeverity
message: str
current_value: Any
expected: str
@dataclass
class ValidationResult:
"""Complete validation result."""
total_records: int
valid_records: int
issues: List[ValidationIssue]
error_count: int
warning_count: int
info_count: int
validation_date: datetime
passed: bool
class CWICRDataValidator:
"""Validate CWICR data and estimates."""
# Standard validation rules
REQUIRED_FIELDS = ['work_item_code', 'description', 'unit']
NUMERIC_FIELDS = ['labor_cost', 'material_cost', 'equipment_cost', 'labor_norm']
POSITIVE_FIELDS = ['labor_cost', 'material_cost', 'equipment_cost', 'quantity']
# Outlier detection thresholds (IQR multiplier)
OUTLIER_THRESHOLD = 3.0
def __init__(self, cwicr_reference: pd.DataFrame = None):
self.reference = cwicr_reference
if cwicr_reference is not None:
self._build_reference_stats()
def _build_reference_stats(self):
"""Build reference statistics for outlier detection."""
self._stats = {}
for col in self.NUMERIC_FIELDS:
if col in self.reference.columns:
values = pd.to_numeric(self.reference[col], errors='coerce').dropna()
if len(values) > 0:
self._stats[col] = {
'mean': values.mean(),
'std': values.std(),
'q1': values.quantile(0.25),
'q3': values.quantile(0.75),
'iqr': values.quantile(0.75) - values.quantile(0.25)
}
def validate_dataframe(self, df: pd.DataFrame) -> ValidationResult:
"""Validate entire dataframe."""
issues = []
valid_count = 0
for idx, row in df.iterrows():
row_issues = self._validate_row(row, str(idx))
issues.extend(row_issues)
if not any(i.severity == ValidationSeverity.ERROR for i in row_issues):
valid_count += 1
# Check for duplicates
if 'work_item_code' in df.columns:
duplicates = df[df.duplicated(subset=['work_item_code'], keep=False)]
for idx, row in duplicates.iterrows():
issues.append(ValidationIssue(
field='work_item_code',
record_id=str(idx),
category=ValidationCategory.DUPLICATE,
severity=ValidationSeverity.WARNING,
message=f"Duplicate work item code: {row['work_item_code']}",
current_value=row['work_item_code'],
expected="Unique codes"
))
error_count = sum(1 for i in issues if i.severity == ValidationSeverity.ERROR)
warning_count = sum(1 for i in issues if i.severity == ValidationSeverity.WARNING)
info_count = sum(1 for i in issues if i.severity == ValidationSeverity.INFO)
return ValidationResult(
total_records=len(df),
valid_records=valid_count,
issues=issues,
error_count=error_count,
warning_count=warning_count,
info_count=info_count,
validation_date=datetime.now(),
passed=error_count == 0
)
def _validate_row(self, row: pd.Series, record_id: str) -> List[ValidationIssue]:
"""Validate single row."""
issues = []
# Check required fields
for field in self.REQUIRED_FIELDS:
if field in row.index:
value = row[field]
if pd.isna(value) or str(value).strip() == '':
issues.append(ValidationIssue(
field=field,
record_id=record_id,
category=ValidationCategory.MISSING_DATA,
severity=ValidationSeverity.ERROR,
message=f"Required field '{field}' is missing",
current_value=value,
expected="Non-empty value"
))
# Check numeric fields
for field in self.NUMERIC_FIELDS:
if field in row.index:
value = row[field]
if pd.notna(value):
try:
num_val = float(value)
# Check for negative where positive expected
if field in self.POSITIVE_FIELDS and num_val < 0:
issues.append(ValidationIssue(
field=field,
record_id=record_id,
category=ValidationCategory.INVALID_VALUE,
severity=ValidationSeverity.ERROR,
message=f"Negative value in '{field}'",
current_value=value,
expected="Positive number"
))
# Check for outliers
if self._stats and field in self._stats:
stats = self._stats[field]
lower = stats['q1'] - self.OUTLIER_THRESHOLD * stats['iqr']
upper = stats['q3'] + self.OUTLIER_THRESHOLD * stats['iqr']
if num_val < lower or num_val > upper:
issues.append(ValidationIssue(
field=field,
record_id=record_id,
category=ValidationCategory.OUTLIER,
severity=ValidationSeverity.WARNING,
message=f"Outlier value in '{field}'",
current_value=value,
expected=f"Between {lower:.2f} and {upper:.2f}"
))
except (ValueError, TypeError):
issues.append(ValidationIssue(
field=field,
record_id=record_id,
category=ValidationCategory.INVALID_VALUE,
severity=ValidationSeverity.ERROR,
message=f"Non-numeric value in '{field}'",
current_value=value,
expected="Numeric value"
))
# Check work item code format
if 'work_item_code' in row.index:
code = row['work_item_code']
if pd.notna(code) and not self._valid_code_format(str(code)):
issues.append(ValidationIssue(
field='work_item_code',
record_id=record_id,
category=ValidationCategory.FORMAT,
severity=ValidationSeverity.INFO,
message="Non-standard code format",
current_value=code,
expected="CATEGORY-NUMBER format"
))
return issues
def _valid_code_format(self, code: str) -> bool:
"""Check if code follows expected format."""
# Expect format like "CONC-001" or "EXCV-DEEP-002"
parts = code.split('-')
return len(parts) >= 2 and parts[0].isalpha()
def validate_estimate(self,
items: List[Dict[str, Any]],
check_against_cwicr: bool = True) -> ValidationResult:
"""Validate estimate items."""
issues = []
valid_count = 0
for i, item in enumerate(items):
record_id = str(i)
item_issues = []
# Check required fields
code = item.get('work_item_code', item.get('code'))
if not code:
item_issues.append(ValidationIssue(
field='work_item_code',
record_id=record_id,
category=ValidationCategory.MISSING_DATA,
severity=ValidationSeverity.ERROR,
message="Missing work item code",
current_value=None,
expected="Valid work item code"
))
# Check quantity
qty = item.get('quantity', 0)
if qty <= 0:
item_issues.append(ValidationIssue(
field='quantity',
record_id=record_id,
category=ValidationCategory.INVALID_VALUE,
severity=ValidationSeverity.ERROR,
message="Invalid quantity",
current_value=qty,
expected="Positive number"
))
# Check against CWICR reference
if check_against_cwicr and self.reference is not None and code:
if 'work_item_code' in self.reference.columns:
if code not in self.reference['work_item_code'].values:
item_issues.append(ValidationIssue(
field='work_item_code',
record_id=record_id,
category=ValidationCategory.INVALID_VALUE,
severity=ValidationSeverity.WARNING,
message=f"Work item code not found in CWICR: {code}",
current_value=code,
expected="Valid CWICR code"
))
issues.extend(item_issues)
if not any(i.severity == ValidationSeverity.ERROR for i in item_issues):
valid_count += 1
return ValidationResult(
total_records=len(items),
valid_records=valid_count,
issues=issues,
error_count=sum(1 for i in issues if i.severity == ValidationSeverity.ERROR),
warning_count=sum(1 for i in issues if i.severity == ValidationSeverity.WARNING),
info_count=sum(1 for i in issues if i.severity == ValidationSeverity.INFO),
validation_date=datetime.now(),
passed=all(i.severity != ValidationSeverity.ERROR for i in issues)
)
def get_data_quality_score(self, result: ValidationResult) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Calculate data quality score."""
if result.total_records == 0:
return {'score': 0, 'grade': 'N/A'}
# Weighted scoring
error_weight = 10
warning_weight = 3
info_weight = 1
total_deductions = (
result.error_count * error_weight +
result.warning_count * warning_weight +
result.info_count * info_weight
)
max_deductions = result.total_records * error_weight
score = max(0, 100 - (total_deductions / max_deductions * 100)) if max_deductions > 0 else 100
# Assign grade
if score >= 95:
grade = 'A'
elif score >= 85:
grade = 'B'
elif score >= 75:
grade = 'C'
elif score >= 60:
grade = 'D'
else:
grade = 'F'
return {
'score': round(score, 1),
'grade': grade,
'total_records': result.total_records,
'valid_records': result.valid_records,
'error_count': result.error_count,
'warning_count': result.warning_count
}
def export_validation_report(self,
result: ValidationResult,
output_path: str) -> str:
"""Export validation report to Excel."""
with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
# Summary
quality = self.get_data_quality_score(result)
summary_df = pd.DataFrame([{
'Total Records': result.total_records,
'Valid Records': result.valid_records,
'Errors': result.error_count,
'Warnings': result.warning_count,
'Info': result.info_count,
'Quality Score': quality['score'],
'Grade': quality['grade'],
'Validation Date': result.validation_date,
'Passed': result.passed
}])
summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)
# Issues
if result.issues:
issues_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Record': i.record_id,
'Field': i.field,
'Category': i.category.value,
'Severity': i.severity.value,
'Message': i.message,
'Current Value': str(i.current_value),
'Expected': i.expected
}
for i in result.issues
])
issues_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Issues', index=False)
return output_path
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 438 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 3a32f618a943
cwicr-data-validator is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (308 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 3,115 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-builder
Automatically detect source types and build AI skills using Skill Seekers. Use when the user wants to create skills from documentation, repos, PDFs, videos, or other knowledge sources.
session-deep-dive
Deep qualitative analysis of high-signal sessions. Spawns subagents with v2 template, synthesizes patterns, compares against known findings. Use after /session-scan.
brainstorm
Brainstorm Elixir/Phoenix features — explore ideas, compare approaches, gather requirements. Use when vague idea, not sure how to approach, or want to discuss before plan.
ecto-patterns
Ecto patterns — schemas, changesets, queries, migrations, Multi, associations, preloads, upserts. Use when editing Repo calls, Ecto.Query, or schema fields. Skip for Ash.
document
Generate @moduledoc/@doc for tested Elixir features; may update their README section or ADR. Not for docs lookup, documentation audits/reviews, or capturing standalone decisions.
phx-research
Research Elixir/Phoenix/Ecto topics or evaluate Hex libraries (--library). Use when learning about libraries, patterns, or comparing approaches. Searches HexDocs, ElixirForum, GitHub.