Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill cwicr-overhead-markupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-overhead-markup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-overhead-markup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-overhead-markup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-overhead-markup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-overhead-markup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.03013 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.01205 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00603 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00301 |
Grade A, and why
cwicr-overhead-markup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- cwicr-overhead-markup — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 412 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CWICR Overhead & Markup Calculator
Business Case
Problem Statement
Direct costs need additional markups:
- General overhead (office, insurance)
- Project overhead (site costs)
- Profit margins
- Bonds and insurance
Solution
Systematic markup application to CWICR direct costs with configurable rates for overhead, profit, bonds, and other indirect costs.
Business Value
- Complete pricing - From cost to selling price
- Configurable rates - By project/client type
- Transparency - Clear markup breakdown
- Consistency - Standard markup application
Technical Implementation
import pandas as pd
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
class MarkupType(Enum):
"""Types of markup."""
OVERHEAD = "overhead"
PROFIT = "profit"
BOND = "bond"
INSURANCE = "insurance"
CONTINGENCY = "contingency"
TAX = "tax"
ESCALATION = "escalation"
CUSTOM = "custom"
class MarkupMethod(Enum):
"""Markup calculation methods."""
ON_COST = "on_cost" # Markup on direct cost
ON_COST_PLUS = "on_cost_plus" # Markup on cost + previous markups
FIXED = "fixed" # Fixed amount
@dataclass
class MarkupItem:
"""Single markup item."""
name: str
markup_type: MarkupType
rate: float
method: MarkupMethod
base_amount: float
markup_amount: float
@dataclass
class MarkupSchedule:
"""Complete markup schedule."""
name: str
markups: List[MarkupItem]
def get_total_rate(self) -> float:
"""Get combined markup rate."""
return sum(m.rate for m in self.markups)
@dataclass
class PricingResult:
"""Complete pricing with all markups."""
direct_cost: float
labor_cost: float
material_cost: float
equipment_cost: float
subcontractor_cost: float
markups: List[MarkupItem]
total_markup: float
total_price: float
markup_percentage: float
# Standard markup templates
MARKUP_TEMPLATES = {
'residential': {
'overhead': 0.10,
'profit': 0.10,
'contingency': 0.05
},
'commercial': {
'overhead': 0.12,
'profit': 0.08,
'bond': 0.015,
'insurance': 0.02,
'contingency': 0.05
},
'industrial': {
'overhead': 0.15,
'profit': 0.08,
'bond': 0.02,
'insurance': 0.025,
'contingency': 0.08
},
'government': {
'overhead': 0.12,
'profit': 0.06,
'bond': 0.025,
'contingency': 0.05
},
'subcontractor': {
'overhead': 0.08,
'profit': 0.10
}
}
class CWICROverheadMarkup:
"""Apply overhead and markup to CWICR estimates."""
def __init__(self, cwicr_data: pd.DataFrame = None):
self.cost_data = cwicr_data
if cwicr_data is not None:
self._index_data()
def _index_data(self):
"""Index cost data."""
if 'work_item_code' in self.cost_data.columns:
self._code_index = self.cost_data.set_index('work_item_code')
else:
self._code_index = None
def get_template(self, template_name: str) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""Get markup template."""
return MARKUP_TEMPLATES.get(template_name, MARKUP_TEMPLATES['commercial'])
def create_markup_schedule(self,
name: str,
markups: Dict[str, float],
method: MarkupMethod = MarkupMethod.ON_COST) -> MarkupSchedule:
"""Create markup schedule from rates."""
items = []
for markup_name, rate in markups.items():
markup_type = MarkupType.CUSTOM
for mt in MarkupType:
if mt.value in markup_name.lower():
markup_type = mt
break
items.append(MarkupItem(
name=markup_name,
markup_type=markup_type,
rate=rate,
method=method,
base_amount=0,
markup_amount=0
))
return MarkupSchedule(name=name, markups=items)
def apply_markups(self,
direct_cost: float,
schedule: MarkupSchedule,
cost_breakdown: Dict[str, float] = None) -> PricingResult:
"""Apply markup schedule to direct cost."""
if cost_breakdown is None:
cost_breakdown = {
'labor': direct_cost * 0.40,
'material': direct_cost * 0.45,
'equipment': direct_cost * 0.10,
'subcontractor': direct_cost * 0.05
}
markup_items = []
running_total = direct_cost
for markup in schedule.markups:
if markup.method == MarkupMethod.ON_COST:
base = direct_cost
elif markup.method == MarkupMethod.ON_COST_PLUS:
base = running_total
else: # FIXED
base = 1
amount = base * markup.rate
markup_items.append(MarkupItem(
name=markup.name,
markup_type=markup.markup_type,
rate=markup.rate,
method=markup.method,
base_amount=round(base, 2),
markup_amount=round(amount, 2)
))
running_total += amount
total_markup = running_total - direct_cost
markup_pct = (total_markup / direct_cost * 100) if direct_cost > 0 else 0
return PricingResult(
direct_cost=round(direct_cost, 2),
labor_cost=round(cost_breakdown.get('labor', 0), 2),
material_cost=round(cost_breakdown.get('material', 0), 2),
equipment_cost=round(cost_breakdown.get('equipment', 0), 2),
subcontractor_cost=round(cost_breakdown.get('subcontractor', 0), 2),
markups=markup_items,
total_markup=round(total_markup, 2),
total_price=round(running_total, 2),
markup_percentage=round(markup_pct, 1)
)
def price_estimate(self,
items: List[Dict[str, Any]],
template: str = 'commercial') -> PricingResult:
"""Price complete estimate with markups."""
# Calculate direct costs
labor = 0
material = 0
equipment = 0
subcontractor = 0
for item in items:
code = item.get('work_item_code', item.get('code'))
qty = item.get('quantity', 0)
if self._code_index is not None and code in self._code_index.index:
wi = self._code_index.loc[code]
labor += float(wi.get('labor_cost', 0) or 0) * qty
material += float(wi.get('material_cost', 0) or 0) * qty
equipment += float(wi.get('equipment_cost', 0) or 0) * qty
subcontractor += item.get('subcontractor_cost', 0)
direct_cost = labor + material + equipment + subcontractor
cost_breakdown = {
'labor': labor,
'material': material,
'equipment': equipment,
'subcontractor': subcontractor
}
# Get template and create schedule
rates = self.get_template(template)
schedule = self.create_markup_schedule(template, rates)
return self.apply_markups(direct_cost, schedule, cost_breakdown)
def calculate_bid_price(self,
direct_cost: float,
overhead_rate: float = 0.12,
profit_rate: float = 0.08,
bond_rate: float = 0.015,
contingency_rate: float = 0.05) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Calculate bid price with standard markups."""
overhead = direct_cost * overhead_rate
subtotal1 = direct_cost + overhead
profit = subtotal1 * profit_rate
subtotal2 = subtotal1 + profit
bond = subtotal2 * bond_rate
subtotal3 = subtotal2 + bond
contingency = direct_cost * contingency_rate
total = subtotal3 + contingency
return {
'direct_cost': round(direct_cost, 2),
'overhead': round(overhead, 2),
'overhead_rate': f"{overhead_rate:.1%}",
'profit': round(profit, 2),
'profit_rate': f"{profit_rate:.1%}",
'bond': round(bond, 2),
'bond_rate': f"{bond_rate:.1%}",
'contingency': round(contingency, 2),
'contingency_rate': f"{contingency_rate:.1%}",
'bid_price': round(total, 2),
'total_markup': round(total - direct_cost, 2),
'total_markup_pct': round((total - direct_cost) / direct_cost * 100, 1)
}
def compare_markup_scenarios(self,
direct_cost: float,
scenarios: Dict[str, Dict[str, float]]) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Compare different markup scenarios."""
results = []
for name, rates in scenarios.items():
schedule = self.create_markup_schedule(name, rates)
pricing = self.apply_markups(direct_cost, schedule)
results.append({
'Scenario': name,
'Direct Cost': pricing.direct_cost,
'Total Markup': pricing.total_markup,
'Markup %': pricing.markup_percentage,
'Total Price': pricing.total_price
})
return pd.DataFrame(results)
def export_pricing(self,
result: PricingResult,
output_path: str) -> str:
"""Export pricing breakdown to Excel."""
with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
# Summary
summary_df = pd.DataFrame([{
'Direct Cost': result.direct_cost,
'Labor': result.labor_cost,
'Material': result.material_cost,
'Equipment': result.equipment_cost,
'Subcontractor': result.subcontractor_cost,
'Total Markup': result.total_markup,
'Markup %': result.markup_percentage,
'Total Price': result.total_price
}])
summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)
# Markup Details
markup_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Markup': m.name,
'Type': m.markup_type.value,
'Rate': f"{m.rate:.1%}",
'Base': m.base_amount,
'Amount': m.markup_amount
}
for m in result.markups
])
markup_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Markups', index=False)
return output_path
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 412 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A d3f287c39d1c
cwicr-overhead-markup is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (374 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 3,013 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-era-pricing
Redesign seat-based pricing for the agent era — when one human runs ten agents, per-seat models collapse. Use when agents are eroding seat counts, when asked to migrate to usage- or outcome-based pricing, to price an agent/API tier, or to defend revenue as customers automate their own usage. Produces a pricing…
invest-backup
Back up / restore openInvest's local state — memory/ (holdings, strategy, user profile, committee records, dream logs) + db/ (trade ledger, job run history, market-data cache) + .env (SMTP/API credentials) + userprofile.json. All of this data is .gitignore'd with no historical versions in git, so a single accidental…
job-profitability-analyzer
Find out which clients and jobs actually make money -- allocate real costs (labor hours, materials, subs, overhead) against what each job billed, and rank every client by true margin. Most service businesses discover their biggest client is their least profitable.
peer-bench
Peer benchmarking, multi-ticker financial comparison, growth value matrix, composite z-score ranking, industry peer comparison, competitive benchmarking, sector relative performance, peer group analysis, industry leader comparison, financial ratio benchmarking.
fda-catalyst-vaccines
Vaccine catalyst analysis across the two-gate path: CBER BLA review and the ACIP recommendation gate that turns FDA approval into commercial availability. Lot release, procurement milestones, pediatric bridging, and healthy-population efficacy context — dated, verified, and sized per event.
trading-as-business
Trading as a business, performance review process, trade journaling, capital allocation discipline, business infrastructure for traders, KPI tracking for trading operations.