Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill cwicr-productivity-trackergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-productivity-tracker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-productivity-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-productivity-tracker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-productivity-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-productivity-tracker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.03440 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01720 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00688 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00344 |
Grade A, and why
cwicr-productivity-tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- cwicr-productivity-tracker — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 422 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CWICR Productivity Tracker
Business Case
Problem Statement
Project performance tracking requires:
- Comparing actual vs planned productivity
- Identifying underperforming activities
- Forecasting completion dates
- Learning from historical data
Solution
Track productivity by comparing actual hours/quantities against CWICR norms, generating variance analysis and forecasts.
Business Value
- Performance visibility - Real-time productivity metrics
- Early warning - Identify issues before escalation
- Continuous improvement - Learn from variances
- Accurate forecasting - Data-driven predictions
Technical Implementation
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional, Tuple
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from enum import Enum
from collections import defaultdict
class PerformanceStatus(Enum):
"""Performance status categories."""
EXCELLENT = "excellent" # >110% productivity
ON_TARGET = "on_target" # 90-110%
BELOW_TARGET = "below_target" # 70-90%
CRITICAL = "critical" # <70%
@dataclass
class ProductivityRecord:
"""Single productivity record."""
work_item_code: str
description: str
date: datetime
planned_hours: float
actual_hours: float
planned_quantity: float
actual_quantity: float
productivity_rate: float # Percentage
status: PerformanceStatus
variance_hours: float
labor_cost_variance: float
@dataclass
class ProductivitySummary:
"""Productivity summary for period/project."""
period_start: datetime
period_end: datetime
total_planned_hours: float
total_actual_hours: float
overall_productivity: float
hours_variance: float
cost_variance: float
records: List[ProductivityRecord]
by_status: Dict[str, int]
by_category: Dict[str, float]
trend: List[float] # Daily/weekly productivity trend
class CWICRProductivityTracker:
"""Track productivity against CWICR norms."""
def __init__(self, cwicr_data: pd.DataFrame,
labor_rate: float = 35.0):
self.work_items = cwicr_data
self.labor_rate = labor_rate
self._index_data()
def _index_data(self):
"""Index work items for fast lookup."""
if 'work_item_code' in self.work_items.columns:
self._work_index = self.work_items.set_index('work_item_code')
else:
self._work_index = None
def _get_status(self, productivity_rate: float) -> PerformanceStatus:
"""Determine performance status from productivity rate."""
if productivity_rate >= 110:
return PerformanceStatus.EXCELLENT
elif productivity_rate >= 90:
return PerformanceStatus.ON_TARGET
elif productivity_rate >= 70:
return PerformanceStatus.BELOW_TARGET
else:
return PerformanceStatus.CRITICAL
def calculate_productivity(self,
work_item_code: str,
actual_hours: float,
actual_quantity: float,
date: datetime = None) -> ProductivityRecord:
"""Calculate productivity for single work item."""
if date is None:
date = datetime.now()
if self._work_index is not None and work_item_code in self._work_index.index:
work_item = self._work_index.loc[work_item_code]
labor_norm = float(work_item.get('labor_norm', 0) or 0)
planned_hours = labor_norm * actual_quantity
# Productivity rate (planned/actual * 100)
productivity_rate = (planned_hours / actual_hours * 100) if actual_hours > 0 else 0
# Variances
hours_variance = planned_hours - actual_hours
cost_variance = hours_variance * self.labor_rate
return ProductivityRecord(
work_item_code=work_item_code,
description=str(work_item.get('description', '')),
date=date,
planned_hours=round(planned_hours, 2),
actual_hours=actual_hours,
planned_quantity=actual_quantity, # Using actual as target
actual_quantity=actual_quantity,
productivity_rate=round(productivity_rate, 1),
status=self._get_status(productivity_rate),
variance_hours=round(hours_variance, 2),
labor_cost_variance=round(cost_variance, 2)
)
else:
return ProductivityRecord(
work_item_code=work_item_code,
description="NOT FOUND",
date=date,
planned_hours=0,
actual_hours=actual_hours,
planned_quantity=actual_quantity,
actual_quantity=actual_quantity,
productivity_rate=0,
status=PerformanceStatus.CRITICAL,
variance_hours=0,
labor_cost_variance=0
)
def track_daily_production(self,
records: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> ProductivitySummary:
"""Track daily production from multiple records."""
productivity_records = []
for record in records:
prod = self.calculate_productivity(
work_item_code=record.get('work_item_code', record.get('code')),
actual_hours=record.get('actual_hours', 0),
actual_quantity=record.get('actual_quantity', 0),
date=record.get('date', datetime.now())
)
productivity_records.append(prod)
# Aggregate
total_planned = sum(r.planned_hours for r in productivity_records)
total_actual = sum(r.actual_hours for r in productivity_records)
overall_productivity = (total_planned / total_actual * 100) if total_actual > 0 else 0
# By status
by_status = defaultdict(int)
for r in productivity_records:
by_status[r.status.value] += 1
# Get date range
dates = [r.date for r in productivity_records if r.date]
period_start = min(dates) if dates else datetime.now()
period_end = max(dates) if dates else datetime.now()
return ProductivitySummary(
period_start=period_start,
period_end=period_end,
total_planned_hours=round(total_planned, 2),
total_actual_hours=round(total_actual, 2),
overall_productivity=round(overall_productivity, 1),
hours_variance=round(total_planned - total_actual, 2),
cost_variance=round((total_planned - total_actual) * self.labor_rate, 2),
records=productivity_records,
by_status=dict(by_status),
by_category={},
trend=[]
)
def forecast_completion(self,
remaining_work: List[Dict[str, Any]],
current_productivity: float,
available_hours_per_day: float = 80) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Forecast completion based on current productivity."""
# Calculate remaining planned hours
total_planned = 0
for item in remaining_work:
code = item.get('work_item_code', item.get('code'))
qty = item.get('quantity', 0)
if self._work_index is not None and code in self._work_index.index:
work_item = self._work_index.loc[code]
labor_norm = float(work_item.get('labor_norm', 0) or 0)
total_planned += labor_norm * qty
# Adjust for productivity
if current_productivity > 0:
actual_hours_needed = total_planned / (current_productivity / 100)
else:
actual_hours_needed = total_planned
# Days to complete
days_to_complete = actual_hours_needed / available_hours_per_day if available_hours_per_day > 0 else 0
return {
'remaining_planned_hours': round(total_planned, 1),
'estimated_actual_hours': round(actual_hours_needed, 1),
'current_productivity': current_productivity,
'days_to_complete': int(np.ceil(days_to_complete)),
'forecasted_completion': datetime.now() + timedelta(days=int(np.ceil(days_to_complete))),
'productivity_impact': round(actual_hours_needed - total_planned, 1)
}
def analyze_variance(self,
summary: ProductivitySummary) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Analyze productivity variances in detail."""
# Get critical items
critical = [r for r in summary.records if r.status == PerformanceStatus.CRITICAL]
below_target = [r for r in summary.records if r.status == PerformanceStatus.BELOW_TARGET]
# Top impact items (by cost variance)
sorted_by_impact = sorted(summary.records, key=lambda x: x.labor_cost_variance)
top_negative = [r for r in sorted_by_impact[:5] if r.labor_cost_variance < 0]
top_positive = [r for r in sorted_by_impact[-5:] if r.labor_cost_variance > 0]
return {
'overall_productivity': summary.overall_productivity,
'total_hours_variance': summary.hours_variance,
'total_cost_variance': summary.cost_variance,
'critical_items_count': len(critical),
'below_target_count': len(below_target),
'critical_items': [
{'code': r.work_item_code, 'productivity': r.productivity_rate, 'variance': r.labor_cost_variance}
for r in critical
],
'top_negative_impact': [
{'code': r.work_item_code, 'variance': r.labor_cost_variance}
for r in top_negative
],
'top_positive_impact': [
{'code': r.work_item_code, 'variance': r.labor_cost_variance}
for r in top_positive
],
'recommendations': self._generate_recommendations(critical, below_target)
}
def _generate_recommendations(self,
critical: List[ProductivityRecord],
below_target: List[ProductivityRecord]) -> List[str]:
"""Generate improvement recommendations."""
recommendations = []
if len(critical) > 0:
recommendations.append(
f"Immediate attention needed for {len(critical)} critical items"
)
if len(below_target) > 3:
recommendations.append(
"Consider crew training or method review for underperforming activities"
)
# Check for patterns
critical_codes = [r.work_item_code for r in critical]
if any('CONC' in code for code in critical_codes):
recommendations.append("Review concrete work methods and crew composition")
if any('EXCV' in code for code in critical_codes):
recommendations.append("Check equipment availability and operator skills for excavation")
return recommendations
def export_report(self,
summary: ProductivitySummary,
output_path: str) -> str:
"""Export productivity report to Excel."""
with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
# Details
details_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Work Item': r.work_item_code,
'Description': r.description,
'Date': r.date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d'),
'Planned Hours': r.planned_hours,
'Actual Hours': r.actual_hours,
'Productivity %': r.productivity_rate,
'Status': r.status.value,
'Hours Variance': r.variance_hours,
'Cost Variance': r.labor_cost_variance
}
for r in summary.records
])
details_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Details', index=False)
# Summary
summary_df = pd.DataFrame([{
'Period Start': summary.period_start.strftime('%Y-%m-%d'),
'Period End': summary.period_end.strftime('%Y-%m-%d'),
'Total Planned Hours': summary.total_planned_hours,
'Total Actual Hours': summary.total_actual_hours,
'Overall Productivity %': summary.overall_productivity,
'Hours Variance': summary.hours_variance,
'Cost Variance': summary.cost_variance
}])
summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)
# By Status
status_df = pd.DataFrame([
{'Status': status, 'Count': count}
for status, count in summary.by_status.items()
])
status_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='By Status', index=False)
return output_path
class ProductivityDashboard:
"""Generate productivity dashboard data."""
def __init__(self, tracker: CWICRProductivityTracker):
self.tracker = tracker
def get_kpis(self, summary: ProductivitySummary) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Get key performance indicators."""
return {
'overall_productivity': summary.overall_productivity,
'productivity_status': 'Good' if summary.overall_productivity >= 90 else 'Needs Attention',
'hours_saved': max(0, summary.hours_variance),
'hours_over': abs(min(0, summary.hours_variance)),
'cost_impact': summary.cost_variance,
'items_on_target': summary.by_status.get('on_target', 0) + summary.by_status.get('excellent', 0),
'items_below_target': summary.by_status.get('below_target', 0) + summary.by_status.get('critical', 0)
}
def get_trend_data(self,
historical_summaries: List[ProductivitySummary]) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Get productivity trend data for charting."""
data = []
for s in historical_summaries:
data.append({
'date': s.period_end.strftime('%Y-%m-%d'),
'productivity': s.overall_productivity,
'planned_hours': s.total_planned_hours,
'actual_hours': s.total_actual_hours
})
return pd.DataFrame(data)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 422 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 212512c789fe
cwicr-productivity-tracker is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (310 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 3,440 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-builder
Automatically detect source types and build AI skills using Skill Seekers. Use when the user wants to create skills from documentation, repos, PDFs, videos, or other knowledge sources.
session-deep-dive
Deep qualitative analysis of high-signal sessions. Spawns subagents with v2 template, synthesizes patterns, compares against known findings. Use after /session-scan.
brainstorm
Brainstorm Elixir/Phoenix features — explore ideas, compare approaches, gather requirements. Use when vague idea, not sure how to approach, or want to discuss before plan.
ecto-patterns
Ecto patterns — schemas, changesets, queries, migrations, Multi, associations, preloads, upserts. Use when editing Repo calls, Ecto.Query, or schema fields. Skip for Ash.
phx-research
Research Elixir/Phoenix/Ecto topics or evaluate Hex libraries (--library). Use when learning about libraries, patterns, or comparing approaches. Searches HexDocs, ElixirForum, GitHub.
document
Generate @moduledoc/@doc for tested Elixir features; may update their README section or ADR. Not for docs lookup, documentation audits/reviews, or capturing standalone decisions.