Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill cwicr-risk-calculatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-risk-calculator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-risk-calculator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-risk-calculator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-risk-calculator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/cwicr-risk-calculator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.04068 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.02034 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00814 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00407 |
Grade A, and why
cwicr-risk-calculator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- cwicr-risk-calculator — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 470 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CWICR Risk Calculator
Business Case
Problem Statement
Cost estimates have inherent uncertainty:
- What contingency to apply?
- What is the confidence range?
- Which items have highest risk?
- How to quantify uncertainty?
Solution
Risk-adjusted cost calculations using contingency analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, and probability distributions based on CWICR cost data.
Business Value
- Informed decisions - Understand estimate uncertainty
- Appropriate contingency - Data-driven risk allowance
- Confidence intervals - P50, P80, P90 estimates
- Risk prioritization - Focus on high-impact items
Technical Implementation
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional, Tuple
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from datetime import datetime
from enum import Enum
import random
class RiskLevel(Enum):
"""Risk level categories."""
LOW = "low" # Well-defined, standard work
MEDIUM = "medium" # Some uncertainty
HIGH = "high" # Significant uncertainty
VERY_HIGH = "very_high" # Major unknowns
class DistributionType(Enum):
"""Probability distribution types."""
NORMAL = "normal"
TRIANGULAR = "triangular"
UNIFORM = "uniform"
PERT = "pert"
LOGNORMAL = "lognormal"
@dataclass
class RiskParameters:
"""Risk parameters for a work item."""
work_item_code: str
base_cost: float
risk_level: RiskLevel
distribution: DistributionType
min_factor: float # Multiplier for minimum
max_factor: float # Multiplier for maximum
most_likely_factor: float = 1.0
@dataclass
class MonteCarloResult:
"""Results of Monte Carlo simulation."""
iterations: int
mean: float
std_dev: float
p10: float # 10th percentile
p50: float # Median
p80: float # 80th percentile
p90: float # 90th percentile
min_value: float
max_value: float
values: List[float]
@dataclass
class RiskAnalysisResult:
"""Complete risk analysis result."""
base_estimate: float
risk_adjusted_mean: float
contingency_amount: float
contingency_percent: float
p50_estimate: float
p80_estimate: float
p90_estimate: float
high_risk_items: List[Dict[str, Any]]
item_risks: List[RiskParameters]
monte_carlo: Optional[MonteCarloResult] = None
# Default risk parameters by category
DEFAULT_RISK_PARAMS = {
'CONC': {'risk': RiskLevel.LOW, 'min': 0.95, 'max': 1.15},
'EXCV': {'risk': RiskLevel.MEDIUM, 'min': 0.85, 'max': 1.30},
'STRL': {'risk': RiskLevel.LOW, 'min': 0.95, 'max': 1.10},
'MECH': {'risk': RiskLevel.MEDIUM, 'min': 0.90, 'max': 1.25},
'ELEC': {'risk': RiskLevel.MEDIUM, 'min': 0.90, 'max': 1.20},
'FINI': {'risk': RiskLevel.HIGH, 'min': 0.85, 'max': 1.40},
'SITE': {'risk': RiskLevel.HIGH, 'min': 0.80, 'max': 1.50},
'DEFAULT': {'risk': RiskLevel.MEDIUM, 'min': 0.90, 'max': 1.25}
}
class CWICRRiskCalculator:
"""Calculate risk-adjusted estimates using CWICR data."""
def __init__(self, cwicr_data: pd.DataFrame):
self.work_items = cwicr_data
self._index_data()
def _index_data(self):
"""Index work items."""
if 'work_item_code' in self.work_items.columns:
self._code_index = self.work_items.set_index('work_item_code')
else:
self._code_index = None
def _get_risk_params(self, code: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Get default risk parameters for work item code."""
prefix = code.split('-')[0] if '-' in code else code[:4]
return DEFAULT_RISK_PARAMS.get(prefix, DEFAULT_RISK_PARAMS['DEFAULT'])
def define_item_risk(self,
code: str,
base_cost: float,
risk_level: RiskLevel = None,
distribution: DistributionType = DistributionType.TRIANGULAR,
min_factor: float = None,
max_factor: float = None) -> RiskParameters:
"""Define risk parameters for a work item."""
default_params = self._get_risk_params(code)
if risk_level is None:
risk_level = default_params['risk']
if min_factor is None:
min_factor = default_params['min']
if max_factor is None:
max_factor = default_params['max']
return RiskParameters(
work_item_code=code,
base_cost=base_cost,
risk_level=risk_level,
distribution=distribution,
min_factor=min_factor,
max_factor=max_factor,
most_likely_factor=1.0
)
def calculate_item_risk(self,
items: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> List[RiskParameters]:
"""Calculate risk parameters for list of work items."""
risk_params = []
for item in items:
code = item.get('work_item_code', item.get('code'))
qty = item.get('quantity', 0)
# Get base cost
base_cost = 0
if self._code_index is not None and code in self._code_index.index:
wi = self._code_index.loc[code]
labor = float(wi.get('labor_cost', 0) or 0)
material = float(wi.get('material_cost', 0) or 0)
equipment = float(wi.get('equipment_cost', 0) or 0)
base_cost = (labor + material + equipment) * qty
# Get risk level from item or default
risk_level = item.get('risk_level')
if risk_level and isinstance(risk_level, str):
risk_level = RiskLevel[risk_level.upper()]
params = self.define_item_risk(
code=code,
base_cost=base_cost,
risk_level=risk_level,
min_factor=item.get('min_factor'),
max_factor=item.get('max_factor')
)
risk_params.append(params)
return risk_params
def _sample_distribution(self, params: RiskParameters) -> float:
"""Sample from probability distribution."""
min_cost = params.base_cost * params.min_factor
max_cost = params.base_cost * params.max_factor
mode_cost = params.base_cost * params.most_likely_factor
if params.distribution == DistributionType.TRIANGULAR:
return np.random.triangular(min_cost, mode_cost, max_cost)
elif params.distribution == DistributionType.UNIFORM:
return np.random.uniform(min_cost, max_cost)
elif params.distribution == DistributionType.NORMAL:
mean = params.base_cost
std = (max_cost - min_cost) / 6 # 99.7% within range
return max(min_cost, min(max_cost, np.random.normal(mean, std)))
elif params.distribution == DistributionType.PERT:
# PERT/Beta distribution
mean = (min_cost + 4 * mode_cost + max_cost) / 6
std = (max_cost - min_cost) / 6
return max(min_cost, min(max_cost, np.random.normal(mean, std)))
elif params.distribution == DistributionType.LOGNORMAL:
# Lognormal for skewed risks
log_mean = np.log(params.base_cost)
log_std = 0.1 * (params.max_factor - params.min_factor)
return np.random.lognormal(log_mean, log_std)
return params.base_cost
def run_monte_carlo(self,
risk_params: List[RiskParameters],
iterations: int = 10000) -> MonteCarloResult:
"""Run Monte Carlo simulation."""
total_costs = []
for _ in range(iterations):
iteration_total = sum(
self._sample_distribution(params)
for params in risk_params
)
total_costs.append(iteration_total)
total_costs = np.array(total_costs)
return MonteCarloResult(
iterations=iterations,
mean=round(float(np.mean(total_costs)), 2),
std_dev=round(float(np.std(total_costs)), 2),
p10=round(float(np.percentile(total_costs, 10)), 2),
p50=round(float(np.percentile(total_costs, 50)), 2),
p80=round(float(np.percentile(total_costs, 80)), 2),
p90=round(float(np.percentile(total_costs, 90)), 2),
min_value=round(float(np.min(total_costs)), 2),
max_value=round(float(np.max(total_costs)), 2),
values=list(total_costs)
)
def analyze_risk(self,
items: List[Dict[str, Any]],
run_simulation: bool = True,
iterations: int = 10000) -> RiskAnalysisResult:
"""Complete risk analysis of estimate."""
risk_params = self.calculate_item_risk(items)
# Base estimate
base_estimate = sum(p.base_cost for p in risk_params)
# Run Monte Carlo if requested
monte_carlo = None
if run_simulation:
monte_carlo = self.run_monte_carlo(risk_params, iterations)
risk_adjusted_mean = monte_carlo.mean
p50 = monte_carlo.p50
p80 = monte_carlo.p80
p90 = monte_carlo.p90
else:
# Deterministic calculation
risk_adjusted_mean = sum(
p.base_cost * (p.min_factor + 4 * p.most_likely_factor + p.max_factor) / 6
for p in risk_params
)
p50 = risk_adjusted_mean
p80 = sum(
p.base_cost * (p.min_factor + p.max_factor * 3) / 4
for p in risk_params
)
p90 = sum(p.base_cost * p.max_factor * 0.9 for p in risk_params)
contingency = p80 - base_estimate
contingency_pct = (contingency / base_estimate * 100) if base_estimate > 0 else 0
# Identify high risk items
high_risk_items = [
{
'code': p.work_item_code,
'base_cost': p.base_cost,
'risk_level': p.risk_level.value,
'range': f"{p.min_factor:.0%} - {p.max_factor:.0%}",
'risk_exposure': p.base_cost * (p.max_factor - 1)
}
for p in risk_params
if p.risk_level in [RiskLevel.HIGH, RiskLevel.VERY_HIGH]
]
return RiskAnalysisResult(
base_estimate=round(base_estimate, 2),
risk_adjusted_mean=round(risk_adjusted_mean, 2),
contingency_amount=round(contingency, 2),
contingency_percent=round(contingency_pct, 1),
p50_estimate=round(p50, 2),
p80_estimate=round(p80, 2),
p90_estimate=round(p90, 2),
high_risk_items=sorted(high_risk_items, key=lambda x: x['risk_exposure'], reverse=True),
item_risks=risk_params,
monte_carlo=monte_carlo
)
def calculate_contingency(self,
base_estimate: float,
project_phase: str = 'detailed',
complexity: str = 'medium') -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Calculate recommended contingency based on project phase."""
# Standard contingency ranges by phase
contingency_ranges = {
'concept': {'low': 0.25, 'medium': 0.35, 'high': 0.50},
'schematic': {'low': 0.15, 'medium': 0.25, 'high': 0.35},
'detailed': {'low': 0.08, 'medium': 0.12, 'high': 0.18},
'construction': {'low': 0.03, 'medium': 0.05, 'high': 0.08}
}
phase_range = contingency_ranges.get(project_phase, contingency_ranges['detailed'])
rate = phase_range.get(complexity, phase_range['medium'])
return {
'base_estimate': base_estimate,
'contingency_rate': f"{rate:.0%}",
'contingency_amount': round(base_estimate * rate, 2),
'total_with_contingency': round(base_estimate * (1 + rate), 2),
'project_phase': project_phase,
'complexity': complexity
}
def sensitivity_analysis(self,
risk_params: List[RiskParameters],
base_result: MonteCarloResult) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Analyze sensitivity of total cost to each item."""
sensitivities = []
for param in risk_params:
# Calculate contribution to variance
item_variance = (param.base_cost * (param.max_factor - param.min_factor) / 6) ** 2
total_variance = base_result.std_dev ** 2
contribution_pct = (item_variance / total_variance * 100) if total_variance > 0 else 0
sensitivities.append({
'work_item_code': param.work_item_code,
'base_cost': param.base_cost,
'risk_level': param.risk_level.value,
'variance_contribution_pct': round(contribution_pct, 1),
'cost_range_low': round(param.base_cost * param.min_factor, 2),
'cost_range_high': round(param.base_cost * param.max_factor, 2)
})
return pd.DataFrame(sensitivities).sort_values('variance_contribution_pct', ascending=False)
def export_analysis(self,
result: RiskAnalysisResult,
output_path: str) -> str:
"""Export risk analysis to Excel."""
with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
# Summary
summary_df = pd.DataFrame([{
'Base Estimate': result.base_estimate,
'Risk Adjusted Mean': result.risk_adjusted_mean,
'Contingency Amount': result.contingency_amount,
'Contingency %': result.contingency_percent,
'P50 Estimate': result.p50_estimate,
'P80 Estimate': result.p80_estimate,
'P90 Estimate': result.p90_estimate
}])
summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)
# Item Risks
items_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Work Item': p.work_item_code,
'Base Cost': p.base_cost,
'Risk Level': p.risk_level.value,
'Min Factor': p.min_factor,
'Max Factor': p.max_factor,
'Distribution': p.distribution.value
}
for p in result.item_risks
])
items_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Item Risks', index=False)
# High Risk Items
if result.high_risk_items:
high_risk_df = pd.DataFrame(result.high_risk_items)
high_risk_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='High Risk', index=False)
# Monte Carlo distribution (sample)
if result.monte_carlo and result.monte_carlo.values:
mc_df = pd.DataFrame({
'Iteration': range(1, min(1001, len(result.monte_carlo.values) + 1)),
'Total Cost': result.monte_carlo.values[:1000]
})
mc_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Monte Carlo', index=False)
return output_path
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 470 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 9dc19183dc9c
cwicr-risk-calculator is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (310 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 4,068 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
stripe-payments
Add Stripe payments to a web app — Checkout Sessions, Payment Intents, subscriptions, webhooks, customer portal, and pricing pages. Covers the decision of which Stripe API to use, produces working integration code, and handles webhook verification. No MCP server needed — uses Stripe npm package directly. Triggers…
"biz-management-accounting"
"Management accounting toolkit for internal decision support: ABC costing, variance analysis, transfer pricing, and responsibility accounting. Use for product profitability disputes, budget variance diagnosis, inter-division pricing design, and business-unit manager performance evaluation. Triggers…
actuarial-modeling
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..
asset-lifecycle
Analyzes asset lifecycle planning systems for capital expenditure forecasting, replacement scheduling, total cost of ownership modeling, depreciation tracking, and facility condition assessments using IFMA standards and Facility Condition Index scoring..
commodity-pricing
Analyze commodity pricing and trading systems including forward curves, option models, position management, risk metrics, and regulatory reporting. Triggers: 'review pricing models', 'audit trading system', 'evaluate VaR implementation', 'check commodity risk management'.
fraud-detection
Analyze fraud detection systems including rule engines, ML scoring models, real-time transaction monitoring, alert triage workflows, false positive management, SAR/CTR regulatory reporting, adversarial robustness testing, and adaptive retraining pipelines for payment fraud, account takeover, identity theft, and AML…