Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill data-evolution-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-evolution-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-evolution-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-evolution-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-evolution-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datadrivenconstruction/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-evolution-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.05240 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.02096 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00524 |
Grade A, and why
data-evolution-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- data-evolution-analysis — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 699 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Evolution Analysis
Overview
Based on DDC methodology (Chapter 1.1), this skill analyzes data evolution patterns in construction organizations, assessing digital maturity levels from paper-based workflows to fully data-driven operations.
Book Reference: "Эволюция использования данных в строительной отрасли" / "Evolution of Data Usage in Construction"
Quick Start
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from typing import List, Dict, Optional
from datetime import datetime
import json
class MaturityLevel(Enum):
"""Digital maturity levels based on DDC methodology"""
LEVEL_0_PAPER = 0 # Paper-based, no digital tools
LEVEL_1_BASIC = 1 # Basic digital (spreadsheets, email)
LEVEL_2_STRUCTURED = 2 # Structured databases, some integration
LEVEL_3_INTEGRATED = 3 # ERP/BIM integration, workflows
LEVEL_4_AUTOMATED = 4 # Automated processes, ML/AI
LEVEL_5_PREDICTIVE = 5 # Predictive analytics, digital twins
class DataCategory(Enum):
"""Categories of construction data"""
DESIGN = "design"
COST = "cost"
SCHEDULE = "schedule"
QUALITY = "quality"
SAFETY = "safety"
PROCUREMENT = "procurement"
DOCUMENT = "document"
COMMUNICATION = "communication"
@dataclass
class DataFlowAssessment:
"""Assessment of data flow in an organization"""
category: DataCategory
source_systems: List[str]
storage_format: str
integration_level: float # 0-1
automation_level: float # 0-1
data_quality_score: float # 0-1
issues: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
@dataclass
class MaturityAssessment:
"""Complete digital maturity assessment"""
organization_name: str
assessment_date: datetime
overall_level: MaturityLevel
category_scores: Dict[DataCategory, float]
data_flows: List[DataFlowAssessment]
strengths: List[str]
weaknesses: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
roadmap: Dict[str, List[str]]
class DataEvolutionAnalyzer:
"""
Analyze data evolution and digital maturity in construction organizations.
Based on DDC methodology Chapter 1.1.
"""
def __init__(self):
self.assessment_criteria = self._load_criteria()
self.evolution_stages = self._define_evolution_stages()
def _load_criteria(self) -> Dict[DataCategory, Dict]:
"""Load assessment criteria for each category"""
return {
DataCategory.DESIGN: {
"tools": ["CAD", "BIM", "Collaboration Platform"],
"metrics": ["model_usage", "clash_detection", "design_reviews"],
"weight": 0.20
},
DataCategory.COST: {
"tools": ["Spreadsheets", "Estimating Software", "ERP"],
"metrics": ["automation_level", "historical_data", "benchmarking"],
"weight": 0.15
},
DataCategory.SCHEDULE: {
"tools": ["Gantt Charts", "CPM Software", "4D BIM"],
"metrics": ["resource_loading", "progress_tracking", "forecasting"],
"weight": 0.15
},
DataCategory.QUALITY: {
"tools": ["Checklists", "QC Software", "Defect Tracking"],
"metrics": ["inspection_digitization", "defect_analytics", "compliance"],
"weight": 0.12
},
DataCategory.SAFETY: {
"tools": ["Incident Reports", "Safety Software", "IoT Sensors"],
"metrics": ["incident_tracking", "predictive_safety", "training"],
"weight": 0.12
},
DataCategory.PROCUREMENT: {
"tools": ["RFQ Manual", "e-Procurement", "Supply Chain"],
"metrics": ["vendor_management", "material_tracking", "integration"],
"weight": 0.10
},
DataCategory.DOCUMENT: {
"tools": ["File Shares", "DMS", "CDE"],
"metrics": ["version_control", "access_control", "searchability"],
"weight": 0.08
},
DataCategory.COMMUNICATION: {
"tools": ["Email", "Collaboration", "Unified Platform"],
"metrics": ["response_time", "transparency", "audit_trail"],
"weight": 0.08
}
}
def _define_evolution_stages(self) -> Dict[MaturityLevel, Dict]:
"""Define characteristics of each evolution stage"""
return {
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_0_PAPER: {
"name": "Paper-Based",
"description": "Manual, paper-based processes",
"characteristics": [
"Physical document storage",
"Manual data entry",
"Limited data sharing",
"No real-time visibility"
],
"typical_tools": ["Paper forms", "Physical filing"]
},
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_1_BASIC: {
"name": "Basic Digital",
"description": "Basic digitization with standalone tools",
"characteristics": [
"Spreadsheets for calculations",
"Email for communication",
"File shares for storage",
"Manual data transfer between systems"
],
"typical_tools": ["Excel", "Word", "Email", "File shares"]
},
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_2_STRUCTURED: {
"name": "Structured Data",
"description": "Structured databases and specialized software",
"characteristics": [
"Department-specific software",
"Structured databases",
"Basic reporting",
"Some standardization"
],
"typical_tools": ["CAD", "Estimating software", "Project software"]
},
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_3_INTEGRATED: {
"name": "Integrated Systems",
"description": "Connected systems with data flow",
"characteristics": [
"ERP integration",
"BIM adoption",
"Automated workflows",
"Cross-department data sharing"
],
"typical_tools": ["BIM", "ERP", "CDE", "BI dashboards"]
},
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_4_AUTOMATED: {
"name": "Automated & Analytics",
"description": "Automation and advanced analytics",
"characteristics": [
"Automated data collection",
"Machine learning models",
"Predictive analytics",
"Real-time dashboards"
],
"typical_tools": ["ML platforms", "IoT", "Advanced analytics"]
},
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_5_PREDICTIVE: {
"name": "Predictive & Autonomous",
"description": "AI-driven, predictive operations",
"characteristics": [
"Digital twins",
"Autonomous decision support",
"Continuous optimization",
"Predictive maintenance"
],
"typical_tools": ["Digital twins", "AI/ML", "Autonomous systems"]
}
}
def assess_organization(
self,
organization_name: str,
survey_responses: Dict[str, any],
system_inventory: List[Dict],
process_documentation: Optional[Dict] = None
) -> MaturityAssessment:
"""
Perform comprehensive digital maturity assessment.
Args:
organization_name: Name of the organization
survey_responses: Responses from maturity survey
system_inventory: List of systems/tools in use
process_documentation: Optional process documentation
Returns:
Complete maturity assessment
"""
# Analyze data flows
data_flows = self._analyze_data_flows(system_inventory, survey_responses)
# Calculate category scores
category_scores = self._calculate_category_scores(
data_flows, survey_responses
)
# Determine overall maturity level
overall_score = sum(
score * self.assessment_criteria[cat]["weight"]
for cat, score in category_scores.items()
)
overall_level = self._score_to_level(overall_score)
# Identify strengths and weaknesses
strengths, weaknesses = self._identify_gaps(category_scores)
# Generate recommendations
recommendations = self._generate_recommendations(
overall_level, weaknesses, data_flows
)
# Create roadmap
roadmap = self._create_roadmap(overall_level, recommendations)
return MaturityAssessment(
organization_name=organization_name,
assessment_date=datetime.now(),
overall_level=overall_level,
category_scores=category_scores,
data_flows=data_flows,
strengths=strengths,
weaknesses=weaknesses,
recommendations=recommendations,
roadmap=roadmap
)
def _analyze_data_flows(
self,
system_inventory: List[Dict],
survey_responses: Dict
) -> List[DataFlowAssessment]:
"""Analyze data flows between systems"""
flows = []
for category in DataCategory:
# Find systems for this category
category_systems = [
s for s in system_inventory
if s.get("category") == category.value
]
if not category_systems:
flows.append(DataFlowAssessment(
category=category,
source_systems=[],
storage_format="none",
integration_level=0.0,
automation_level=0.0,
data_quality_score=0.0,
issues=["No systems identified for this category"]
))
continue
# Analyze integration and automation
integration = self._calculate_integration_score(category_systems)
automation = self._calculate_automation_score(
category_systems, survey_responses
)
quality = survey_responses.get(
f"{category.value}_data_quality", 0.5
)
# Identify issues
issues = self._identify_flow_issues(
category_systems, integration, automation
)
flows.append(DataFlowAssessment(
category=category,
source_systems=[s["name"] for s in category_systems],
storage_format=category_systems[0].get("format", "unknown"),
integration_level=integration,
automation_level=automation,
data_quality_score=quality,
issues=issues
))
return flows
def _calculate_integration_score(
self, systems: List[Dict]
) -> float:
"""Calculate integration score for systems"""
if not systems:
return 0.0
total_integrations = sum(
len(s.get("integrations", [])) for s in systems
)
max_integrations = len(systems) * 3 # Assume max 3 integrations per system
return min(1.0, total_integrations / max_integrations)
def _calculate_automation_score(
self,
systems: List[Dict],
survey: Dict
) -> float:
"""Calculate automation score"""
scores = []
for system in systems:
system_score = 0.0
if system.get("has_api"):
system_score += 0.3
if system.get("automated_imports"):
system_score += 0.3
if system.get("automated_exports"):
system_score += 0.2
if system.get("workflow_automation"):
system_score += 0.2
scores.append(system_score)
return sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0.0
def _calculate_category_scores(
self,
data_flows: List[DataFlowAssessment],
survey: Dict
) -> Dict[DataCategory, float]:
"""Calculate maturity score for each category"""
scores = {}
for flow in data_flows:
# Combine different aspects
tool_score = survey.get(f"{flow.category.value}_tool_maturity", 0.5)
process_score = survey.get(f"{flow.category.value}_process_maturity", 0.5)
category_score = (
tool_score * 0.3 +
process_score * 0.2 +
flow.integration_level * 0.2 +
flow.automation_level * 0.2 +
flow.data_quality_score * 0.1
)
scores[flow.category] = category_score
return scores
def _score_to_level(self, score: float) -> MaturityLevel:
"""Convert numeric score to maturity level"""
if score < 0.1:
return MaturityLevel.LEVEL_0_PAPER
elif score < 0.25:
return MaturityLevel.LEVEL_1_BASIC
elif score < 0.45:
return MaturityLevel.LEVEL_2_STRUCTURED
elif score < 0.65:
return MaturityLevel.LEVEL_3_INTEGRATED
elif score < 0.85:
return MaturityLevel.LEVEL_4_AUTOMATED
else:
return MaturityLevel.LEVEL_5_PREDICTIVE
def _identify_gaps(
self,
scores: Dict[DataCategory, float]
) -> tuple[List[str], List[str]]:
"""Identify strengths and weaknesses"""
avg_score = sum(scores.values()) / len(scores)
strengths = [
f"{cat.value}: {score:.0%}"
for cat, score in scores.items()
if score > avg_score + 0.1
]
weaknesses = [
f"{cat.value}: {score:.0%}"
for cat, score in scores.items()
if score < avg_score - 0.1
]
return strengths, weaknesses
def _identify_flow_issues(
self,
systems: List[Dict],
integration: float,
automation: float
) -> List[str]:
"""Identify issues in data flow"""
issues = []
if integration < 0.3:
issues.append("Low system integration - data silos likely")
if automation < 0.3:
issues.append("Manual data transfer required")
if len(systems) > 3:
issues.append("Multiple overlapping systems")
return issues
def _generate_recommendations(
self,
level: MaturityLevel,
weaknesses: List[str],
flows: List[DataFlowAssessment]
) -> List[str]:
"""Generate improvement recommendations"""
recommendations = []
# Level-specific recommendations
level_recs = {
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_0_PAPER: [
"Implement basic digital tools (spreadsheets, file sharing)",
"Digitize critical paper-based processes",
"Train staff on basic digital skills"
],
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_1_BASIC: [
"Adopt specialized construction software",
"Implement structured data storage",
"Standardize data formats and naming conventions"
],
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_2_STRUCTURED: [
"Integrate key systems (ERP, PM, BIM)",
"Implement Common Data Environment (CDE)",
"Develop automated workflows"
],
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_3_INTEGRATED: [
"Implement advanced analytics and dashboards",
"Explore IoT for automated data collection",
"Develop machine learning models for prediction"
],
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_4_AUTOMATED: [
"Implement digital twin technology",
"Deploy AI-driven decision support",
"Enable predictive maintenance and operations"
],
MaturityLevel.LEVEL_5_PREDICTIVE: [
"Continuous optimization of AI models",
"Expand autonomous decision-making",
"Industry leadership and knowledge sharing"
]
}
recommendations.extend(level_recs.get(level, []))
# Address specific weaknesses
for flow in flows:
if flow.integration_level < 0.3:
recommendations.append(
f"Improve {flow.category.value} system integrations"
)
if flow.data_quality_score < 0.5:
recommendations.append(
f"Implement data quality controls for {flow.category.value}"
)
return recommendations[:10] # Top 10 recommendations
def _create_roadmap(
self,
current_level: MaturityLevel,
recommendations: List[str]
) -> Dict[str, List[str]]:
"""Create phased improvement roadmap"""
return {
"Phase 1 (0-6 months)": recommendations[:3],
"Phase 2 (6-12 months)": recommendations[3:6],
"Phase 3 (12-24 months)": recommendations[6:],
"Target Level": [
f"Move from {current_level.name} to "
f"{MaturityLevel(min(current_level.value + 1, 5)).name}"
]
}
def compare_assessments(
self,
assessments: List[MaturityAssessment]
) -> Dict:
"""Compare multiple assessments over time or across organizations"""
comparison = {
"assessments": len(assessments),
"levels": [a.overall_level.name for a in assessments],
"trends": {},
"best_practices": []
}
# Track category trends
for category in DataCategory:
scores = [a.category_scores[category] for a in assessments]
comparison["trends"][category.value] = {
"scores": scores,
"improvement": scores[-1] - scores[0] if len(scores) > 1 else 0
}
return comparison
def generate_report(
self,
assessment: MaturityAssessment
) -> str:
"""Generate executive summary report"""
stage_info = self.evolution_stages[assessment.overall_level]
report = f"""
# Digital Maturity Assessment Report
## {assessment.organization_name}
**Assessment Date:** {assessment.assessment_date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}
**Overall Maturity Level:** {assessment.overall_level.name} - {stage_info['name']}
### Executive Summary
{stage_info['description']}
### Category Scores
"""
for cat, score in assessment.category_scores.items():
bar = "█" * int(score * 10) + "░" * (10 - int(score * 10))
report += f"- {cat.value.title()}: {bar} {score:.0%}\n"
report += "\n### Strengths\n"
for strength in assessment.strengths:
report += f"- {strength}\n"
report += "\n### Areas for Improvement\n"
for weakness in assessment.weaknesses:
report += f"- {weakness}\n"
report += "\n### Recommendations\n"
for i, rec in enumerate(assessment.recommendations, 1):
report += f"{i}. {rec}\n"
report += "\n### Roadmap\n"
for phase, items in assessment.roadmap.items():
report += f"\n**{phase}**\n"
for item in items:
report += f"- {item}\n"
return report
class DataEvolutionTracker:
"""Track data evolution over time"""
def __init__(self, organization_name: str):
self.organization = organization_name
self.history: List[MaturityAssessment] = []
self.milestones: List[Dict] = []
def add_assessment(self, assessment: MaturityAssessment):
"""Add new assessment to history"""
self.history.append(assessment)
self._check_milestones(assessment)
def _check_milestones(self, assessment: MaturityAssessment):
"""Check if any milestones were reached"""
if len(self.history) > 1:
prev = self.history[-2]
# Level improvement
if assessment.overall_level.value > prev.overall_level.value:
self.milestones.append({
"date": assessment.assessment_date,
"type": "level_up",
"description": f"Advanced from {prev.overall_level.name} "
f"to {assessment.overall_level.name}"
})
# Category improvements
for cat in DataCategory:
if assessment.category_scores[cat] - prev.category_scores[cat] > 0.2:
self.milestones.append({
"date": assessment.assessment_date,
"type": "category_improvement",
"description": f"Significant improvement in {cat.value}"
})
def get_evolution_summary(self) -> Dict:
"""Get summary of evolution over time"""
if not self.history:
return {"error": "No assessments recorded"}
return {
"organization": self.organization,
"first_assessment": self.history[0].assessment_date,
"latest_assessment": self.history[-1].assessment_date,
"starting_level": self.history[0].overall_level.name,
"current_level": self.history[-1].overall_level.name,
"total_assessments": len(self.history),
"milestones": self.milestones,
"level_progression": [a.overall_level.value for a in self.history]
}
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 699 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 9982ed83e7c3
data-evolution-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (372 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 5,240 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
process-mapper
Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being…
estimating-and-contingency
Produces a cost or effort estimate someone can defend — decomposing the work, choosing between analogous, parametric and bottom-up methods, documenting the basis and its assumptions, expressing confidence as a range, and sizing contingency and management reserve separately. Use this to build an estimate, challenge one…
scenario-team-admin
Use when administering a Scenario team from an agent through MCP: restricting which models a team or project can run (model access control, allowlist, blocklist), inviting or removing team and project members, changing roles, capping a member's Creative Unit spend, creating or deleting projects, auditing API keys and…
multi-agent-client-onboarding
Uses Agent SDK to deploy 3 parallel agents for client onboarding -- workflow auditor, tech stack mapper, and strategy drafter. Real consulting workflow that produces a complete client assessment.
requirement-forge-refiner
Facilitate a structured conversation to define requirement standards for a project — epic and feature definitions, scenario structure, AC format, priority notation, status workflow, and naming conventions. Produces a formal requirement-standards.md that the requirement-quality atom reads via config resolution…
board-memo
Draft a board or executive summary of an engagement using outcomes, risks and investment decisions. Use when the sponsor needs to brief senior leadership.