Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DataLab-atom/EvoAny --skill evolvegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DataLab-atom/EvoAnyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datalab-atom/evoany/evolve)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datalab-atom/evoany/evolve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datalab-atom/evoany/evolve/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datalab-atom/evoany/evolve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datalab-atom/evoany/evolve.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00934 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00374 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
evolve scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/evolve — Start Evolution
User provides: repo path, benchmark command, objectives (list of {name, direction} specs), and optionally max evaluations.
Step 1 — Deterministic setup
lobster (
@openclaw/lobster) is bundled as a dependency and installed automatically with this package. If available, setup and teardown run as atomic lobster pipelines. If for some reasonlobsteris missing from$PATH, the same steps run as individualexeccalls — no functionality is lost, lobster only adds atomicity and better error reporting.
With lobster
Run all pre-evolution setup as a single deterministic lobster workflow. This is atomic: if any step fails, the exact failure step is reported and nothing proceeds.
lobster action:run pipeline:"./plugin/workflows/evo-setup.lobster" args:{
"repo": "<repo_path>",
"benchmark": "<benchmark_cmd>",
"objectives": "[{\"name\": \"score\", \"direction\": \"max\"}]"
}
The workflow handles:
- Validate repo is clean (
git status --porcelain) - Run baseline benchmark, capture seed fitness
git tag seed-baseline- Create
memory/directory structure - Initialize
~/clawd/canvas/for dashboard
Parse the baseline fitness from run_baseline.stdout (last line — whitespace-separated
numbers for "numbers" format, or JSON dict for "json" format).
Then call the MCP tools to record it:
evo_initwith user's config (repo, benchmark, objectives, max_evals)evo_report_seedwith the baseline fitness values aslist[float]
Without lobster
Fall back to running each step with individual exec calls (same operations, not atomic).
Step 2 — Code analysis (MapAgent)
Spawn MapAgent to identify optimization targets:
sessions_spawn agentId:map_agent
MapAgent reads the benchmark entry file, traces the call chain (using /oracle if available),
and calls evo_register_targets.
Step 3 — Approval gate: confirm targets before committing budget
After MapAgent completes, present identified targets to the user and ask for confirmation before spending evaluation budget:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 118 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A d66fecbfdd72
evolve is a skill published in the GitHub repository DataLab-atom/EvoAny (37 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 934 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
evolve compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| evolveDataLab-atom/EvoAny | Skill | 37 | 6mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 10 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |